What's new

Redknapp on his way ?????????

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
No need for that. It was a good post.

Those quotes were all about changing clubs. The rumours circulating presently are nothing to do with Redknapp switching to a different team.

Furthermore, the comments were posted after the NOTW article which addresses supposed irregularities regarding transfers, not any rumoured change of employment.

Also, what purpose is served in digging up that kind of quote? Isn't doing so on par with the worst of the gutter press who do it on an almost daily basis?

And lastly, is posting quotes such as that likely to make the rumour-mongering and sense of mild panic:

a) increase; or
b) decrease?

Now, I'm not accusing the poster of doing so, but there are some who simply take great pleasure in stirring up and adding to trouble and don't care whether their comments are appropriate, timely or even relevent as long as the furore intensifies.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
27,010
45,321
Can't see any point in HMRC investigating the differing stories re the 100k, all they will find out is which perfectly innocent and correct scenario is the right one then what.
It's not like Mr Redknapp has said it was a bonus payment and Manderic has said it was an under the counter bung to evade tax on three continents leading to the subversion of the entire transfer system and collapse of FIFA, would that it was but it wasn't:shrug:.
 

Tricky

Active Member
Dec 19, 2004
331
171
Those quotes were all about changing clubs. The rumours circulating presently are nothing to do with Redknapp switching to a different team.

Furthermore, the comments were posted after the NOTW article which addresses supposed irregularities regarding transfers, not any rumoured change of employment.

Also, what purpose is served in digging up that kind of quote? Isn't doing so on par with the worst of the gutter press who do it on an almost daily basis?

And lastly, is posting quotes such as that likely to make the rumour-mongering and sense of mild panic:

a) increase; or
b) decrease?

Now, I'm not accusing the poster of doing so, but there are some who simply take great pleasure in stirring up and adding to trouble and don't care whether their comments are appropriate, timely or even relevent as long as the furore intensifies.

All he has done is state facts. Unlike yourself. Its not about stirring, more pointing out that his vehement denials have been issued before.
 

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
All he has done is state facts. Unlike yourself. Its not about stirring, more pointing out that his vehement denials have been issued before.

No. He is not stating facts. He is reproducing quotes. And he is doing so out of context. There is a very clear difference between the quotes posted by PaulL and Redknapp's denial a couple of days ago - the primary difference being that his leaving Portsmouth or Southampton or whatever would have been more to do with his wishes, rather than that of the club's. Whereas if he leaves Spurs, it will be more to do with saving the reputation of the club, be it contractually enforced or not, something that he has less control over as it depends on any investigation by the police or the HMRC.

Furthermore, I think I can quite cogently argue that I have stated facts, such as the fact that all of the quotes were to do with moving jobs, not regarding any fraudulent activity. Such as the fact that the quotes were posted after the NOTW article was published, which showed that their relevence to the current 'situation' was tenuous, at best.

And finally, I'd be careful of tarring me with the non-fact brush too heavily, as the final paragraph of my post did quite categorically state that I was not accusing the poster of trying to stir up trouble.
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
http://www.oleole.com/blogs/harryhotspur/posts/redschnapps-bailed
News just in that Spurs Supremo and HMRC doyen Arry Redschnapps was 'questioned by police officers for four hours yesterday and bailed until the 21st of this month.'
This is from the source on Spurs Odyssey that first alerted the footballing firmament of the rejuvinated interest the filth had in our illustrious leader.
My dealings with the cops have been somewhat limited, kidnapping a member of the Royal Family, attempting to get a crossy on the Mayor of London's bicycle; that sort of gig and so I'm not exactly sure what is to be read into him being bailed.
Presumably, it suggests that they aren't done with him yet.




 

Acid

In Limbo
Sep 10, 2005
420
211
I thought you could only be "bailed" if you are formally charged with something?
 

piedpiper

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2008
3,790
6,825
i suspect the whole Harry thing had more to do with the new owners at Pompey than the whole tax thing. too much coincidence in them getting a new billionaire owner Tuesday and the betting on Harry last week.
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Peter Storrie charged over Amdy Faye deal and vows to clear his name

Portsmouth chief executive accused of cheating public revenue
• Peter Storrie confident he will be exonerated


Peter Storrie last night reacted with "astonishment" and vowed to clear his name after he was charged with cheating the public revenue over his alleged involvement in Amdy Faye's transfer from Auxerre to Portsmouth in 2003.

Portsmouth's chief executive, who has been on bail since he was arrested almost two years ago on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud and false accounting, is the first person charged in relation to the investigation into alleged corruption in football, which started in April 2007. Storrie has insisted he will "defend the allegations in the strongest possible terms" and remains confident he will be exonerated.

Earlier in the month Storrie had faced further questioning by City of London police and HM Revenue and Customs officials over Faye's move to Portsmouth, which led to a £560,000 payment being made to the agent Willie McKay. McKay and Faye have been cleared of wrongdoing and Storrie, who claimed last night that he played no part in the conclusion of the deal for the Senegal international, had expected the same outcome.

A statement released to the Guardian said: "Mr Storrie would like to place on record his astonishment at the decision that has been made to charge him with an offence of cheating the public revenue, and bewilderment as to how such a conclusion could be reached concerning the transfer of the player Amdy Faye to Portsmouth Football Club. At the time negotiations to acquire this player were concluded, Mr Storrie was on honeymoon and was not directly concerned in the agreement that was reached regarding Faye's acquisition.

"He was at that time and has continued to be the chief executive of the club and remunerated as such. Mr Storrie did not and could not have gained from any cheating of the public revenue given his role within the club and allowing for the fact that he had no proprietary interest in Portsmouth FC.

"Mr Storrie has fully co-operated with the authorities at every stage of this 31-month investigation in the belief and expectation that after an inquiry as protracted as this, the authorities would understand that there was no wrongdoing in any aspect of the player's transfer.

"Mr Storrie will defend the allegations in the strongest possible terms and is entirely confident that he will be exonerated not only of the allegation of cheating the public revenue, but any suggestion that anything untoward took place concerning any transfer dealings in which he was concerned.

"Mr Storrie now welcomes the opportunity he will have of clearing himself of these allegations to ensure that his unblemished 20-year reputation in football management remains untarnished. He will use all available means to bring these proceedings to their proper conclusion as swiftly as possible."

It is understood that Milan Mandaric, the former Portsmouth chairman, and Harry Redknapp, who was manager at Fratton Park before moving to Tottenham Hotspur, have been cleared of any wrongdoing in relation to the Faye transfer. Both, however, remain on bail as authorities continue to investigate a payment that Mandaric made into an offshore account in Redknapp's name. Mandaric maintains that the transaction was "a private matter" and nothing to do with Portsmouth.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/oct/22/peter-storrie-portsmouth
 

WhiteStripe

Get out of my club you cretin!
Aug 23, 2006
14,215
5,001
:lol: once this all comes out 'Arry might be running things from inside his cell!!
 

KentuckyYid

*Eyes That See*
May 11, 2005
13,013
2,265
I can think of far more sinister ways to cheat the public revenue including MP's expense claims and benefit fraud etc. It seems unfair that he's being picked on when I'm sure he's paid more into the public revenue than most MP's and benefit cheats.
 

Bill_Oddie

Everything in Moderation
Staff
Feb 1, 2005
19,120
6,003
I can think of far more sinister ways to cheat the public revenue including MP's expense claims and benefit fraud etc. It seems unfair that he's being picked on when I'm sure he's paid more into the public revenue than most MP's and benefit cheats.

But using that logic, he must have earned more hence have less reason to defraud the public out of tax monies? :shrug:
 

Chris12345

LADdam Hussein
Jan 15, 2005
11,908
31
Yeah, that's like not charging a doctor with murder, cos he's saved a lot more lives than he's taken... :shrug:
 

KentuckyYid

*Eyes That See*
May 11, 2005
13,013
2,265
Like I said it seems unfair that he's being picked on when others get away with worse. I didn't say it was ok, just unfair.
 

stemark44

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2005
6,598
1,829
Harry has already stated that he has paid more than £6m in tax over the years so why would he try and defraud them of a lousey £10 grand!
 

fozzi44

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2006
1,435
37
quite funny really - if redknapp was still at pompey half of us would be busting for him to get done. fuuny how the tide changes!!!!
 

fieryjack

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2006
3,376
703
Every time this thread gets an airing i get excited that the grumpy fucker might`ve genuinely fucked off. Then we wouldnt be associated with his stupid thoughts in the papers.
We should`ve kept Jol, it would`ve saved us a lot of bother and money probably.
 
Top