- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
The fact that he has made an admission of guilt says everything. Legal or not, the bloke has been an arsehole. Fact.
Fucking lol. You must be on a wind up surely
The fact that he has made an admission of guilt says everything. Legal or not, the bloke has been an arsehole. Fact.
You're talking as if The Mirror has morals.
Yes, but you then add a load of stuff where you think he's not, and come up with something slightly bizarre that you think is "worse", so I respond again. We agree he was stupid. I'm just not making excuses for him afterwards
It is good business to ruin a young man's international career, yes, that's why they do it. It sells paper. I'm not condoning it, but I am a realist. It happens. Life's not all flowers, sunshine and £200k-a-week deals. Simply stating a fact is not defending the tabloid press. We all know what they are, and you're in denial if you don't accept that.
Kids having fun.
Nothing to see here.
Highly paid adults so something to see here.
I shudder to think what a Spurs player could be found guilty of and still be defended by some Spurs fans
We like to rip the piss out of Chelsea fans for defending Terry or Liverpool fans for defending Suarez, but our lot have it in them, too. All fans are the same, you take the rough with the smooth
Drinking to excess is worse - both for the user and those around them, than inhaling laughing gas - in pretty much every respect.
Footballers do that all the time.
I won't get into a debate over it, the fella is paid a lot of money to be a role model and has been outed as an idiot, which he has admitted.
Je ne comprendsI'm talking as if the people who constitute the mirror are required to act well to people outside the mirror, morally if you like. The universe puts that demand on them. So do I. The fact that they abrogate their responsibilities makes no difference to the fact that these are incumbent on them in the first place. It is a nasty rag, I agree, but that's not OK. It's not 'realism' to render their harmful behaviour outside of a context where it needs to stop. It's apologism. It's actually unrealistic because the dimension of compassion and treating people well, love's knowledge, is artificially written out of the account.
There's some irony for ya.
of course, I am not role model
I won't get into a debate over it, the fella is paid a lot of money to be a role model and has been outed as an idiot, which he has admitted.