- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,890
- 130,524
He's not manly enough.BC, its ok to be wrong now and again you know.
That clip is about as conclusive as it gets. Why do you go to such extremes to prove you're not wrong about something all the time?
He's not manly enough.BC, its ok to be wrong now and again you know.
That clip is about as conclusive as it gets. Why do you go to such extremes to prove you're not wrong about something all the time?
BC, its ok to be wrong now and again you know.
That clip is about as conclusive as it gets. Why do you go to such extremes to prove you're not wrong about something all the time?
Not strictly true, especially of the manager isn't happy you will be in the next day for sure! The day after the game is usually a warm down session so I think they would of had warm down session Sunday out on the piss Sunday night and day off Monday.Footballers always have the day after the game, off as a rest day
Yeah good one, see what you did there MrP. Except it isn't conclusive. Rose isn't on the line or in the line of Welbeck's shot as he takes it.
I'm not looking to hang him out to try, as I said in my OP he was one of our better performers on the day, and this season generally he's doing OK. But I just don't think he made the right decision. I hadn't even thought about it until I was watching them analyse shit on MNF.
BC, its ok to be wrong now and again you know.
That clip is about as conclusive as it gets. Why do you go to such extremes to prove you're not wrong about something all the time?
Yeah good one, see what you did there MrP. Except it isn't conclusive. Rose isn't on the line or in the line of Welbeck's shot as he takes it.
I'm not looking to hang him out to try, as I said in my OP he was one of our better performers on the day, and this season generally he's doing OK. But I just don't think he made the right decision. I hadn't even thought about it until I was watching them analyse shit on MNF.
I know you're not trying to hang him out to dry. But most people can see what his intention was, an attempt to get back on the line to help cover that side of the goal. Nobody would of anticipated Welbeck doing what he did. Rose made the right move - its only wrong with hindsight because something so unlikely happened.
Maybe maybe not, I don't see how it can be the right thing if he can't actually physically block Welbeck's shot. It's just one of two viable options and hindsight doesn't change that. I think it's a mistake but an instinctive one.
We can speculate about this all day long, and Rose could've had the best intentions at heart when he abandoned his mark (O-C), but the fact remains Poch's system is partly based on positional discipline and on teammates executing the game-plan in sync (be it man-marking or zone).
Rose is not the only one to blame for the goal, but had he maintained his position & stood his ground, O-C would've had little to no scoring chance at all.
Those are just my onions.
It wasn't all pretty (we could've done a little better at the Hemorrhoids - and it could also have been much worse), but at the end of the day I'm sure we can all agree that the ultimate outcome exceeded our expectations.
Yeah, I'm genuinely not looking to scapegoat Rose, who was one of our better players, under testing circumstances. And it was a split second thing. I just don't really understand the logic, he wasn't in place to block the shot from Welbeck so what was he anticipating ?
Ok, lets call it an instinctive mistake - but that's still with hindsight and it all happens so quickly.
Why are you assuming he couldn't of blocked Welbeck's shot? For all we know he miss kicks it...one of those scruffy finishes that often finds the back of the net, and Rose manages to block it.
You have no way of knowing what would of happened if Welbeck had managed to get a shot off.
You see someone teeing up a shot like that, 99 times out of a 100, they'll strike it. He instinctively reacts to try and prevent a likely goal.
I don't blame him whatsoever.
Because on MNF I froze the frame exactly as Welbeck tries to strike it. Rose is still 3 yards from the goal line. A second before Vertonghen actually points Rose to watch OC as well.
Personally I think it's forgivable but still a mistake.
I think he's fucking outstanding.Says the most stubborn member on SC ever
Let's face it BC, you think you're some sort of God of tactical knowledge, but you are really not that great...
More fool youI think he's fucking outstanding.
Yeah I had froze it to, from having sky plussed the game.
Rose is on his way to the line, well in motion, when Welbeck is attempting to strike it. Vertonghen does point before but that's before the chain of events unfold leading Rose to do what he does.
I don't think its even an issue in terms of forgiving. When things happen that quickly, instinctive reactions can pay off or not in this case. The intention was correct so I wouldn't hold it against him in this case.
Anyway, fuck it, we're splitting severe hairs here.
I disagree with this, look again when Verts turns his back and Welbeck swings for it, hitting it straight or to Lloris's right is almost impossible (probably Verts intention in placing his back in that spot), leaving the side Rose covers the most viable option, though this would take a lot more technique to wrap you foot around to do. I actually think this might be why Welbeck mi-kicks, as I think he is trying to wrap his foot around to get the ball to Lloris's left .I don't agree, Vertonghen in marking Welbeck it's almost impossible for Welbeck to hit it toward the side of the goal Rose tries to cover, if Rose just marks his man there's no goal. And he isn't getting back to line in time to do anything about Welbeck's shot.
I agree it's an instinctive action I just don't think it was the right one.