What's new

Vincent Janssen

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
There are many options that are an improvement over Jansen that will provide effective cover and not cost the so called millions you are quoting.
I can't name who but there are alternatives that we need to explore
Basically you haven't got a clue. Thank fuck you're not in charge :ROFLMAO:
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
I'm glad to know that you can both read and relay statistics. Then surely, you would also know that this is better than a player who is older, has also played both in the highest and second highest division, and out of all those seasons on various levels still has only made 4-5 months of something close to decent. If I've said to you in December, let's pay 30M for King, you'd call me barking mad. He simply hasn't transformed into this must-have world beater. We've got what we need for striker position in the squad already. Let's see it through.

May I respectfully ask what 'Let's see it through" means ???? just how long are you prepared to give the guy to come up to expectations, start scoring goals regularly and provide adequate cover for Harry ?
 

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
And who should we get?

People keep saying we can get someone in, but for the life of me, I can't think of one player who


a) would be willing to play, lets be honest, not all that often
b) would cost presumably around 30 million but still
c) not want over 100,000 quid a week in wages all the while
d) being proven as a goalscorer in the premier league or other top european league.

Who is this player?!?!
You're wasting your time. All they can come up with is Josh King. And the fact that's all they can come up with sums up the situation perfectly.
 

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
May I respectfully ask what 'Let's see it through" means ???? just how long are you prepared to give the guy to come up to expectations, start scoring goals regularly and provide adequate cover for Harry ?
How does he start scoring goals regularly as cover for Kane?
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
You're wasting your time. All they can come up with is Josh King. And the fact that's all they can come up with sums up the situation perfectly.

All 'they' can come up with ?? I was asked for my choice and gave it....blimey talk about 'generalisation' ?? So according to you the 'situation' is we are stuck with Janssen and there isn't another feasible alternative ??...sad times indeed.
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
How does he start scoring goals regularly as cover for Kane?

You expect Harry to play in every League, Cup and CPL match ??? Janssen will be given opportunities and must take them...just like the first half this morning against PSG.....what happened...zippo.
 

Ben1

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
2,130
8,411
Ideally, you want a player like martial to offer the width and striker role. Not for a minute suggesting martial because money etc, but a similar player. Names....I have no idea, but I'd keep Janssen around for sure.
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
We shall agree to disagree...after all it's all a question of viewpoints and opinions and that's what makes a forum...and in my estimation Vincent Janssen will prove to be one thing...an expensive and costly liability....time will tell. I do wish before people condemn other people's posts on here with cries of 'rubbish' or 'bollocks' they would begin their posting with three golden words...."In My Opinion" ....it would make such a difference and put a more friendlier tone to discussions
 

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
All 'they' can come up with ?? I was asked for my choice and gave it....blimey talk about 'generalisation' ?? So according to you the 'situation' is we are stuck with Janssen and there isn't another feasible alternative ??...sad times indeed.
Sorry but many posters want to see Janssen sold and a replacement brought in who will be happy to sit on the bench. The only name to come up is Josh King. I'm not against that to be honest. He's done well at Bournemouth. But many anti Janssen posters wantt a quality replacement that will bang in goals if Harry gets injured. Unfortunately no one can provide an alternative except for King. And I don't think he's much of an upgrade. Basically there's very little in the way of an alternative.
 

St José Dominguez

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2014
3,592
11,648
All 'they' can come up with ?? I was asked for my choice and gave it....blimey talk about 'generalisation' ?? So according to you the 'situation' is we are stuck with Janssen and there isn't another feasible alternative ??...sad times indeed.

Just the way it is. If it was in attacking mid I'd say there is plenty of options because whoever signs would have three positions to cover, three different players to be backup to. They'd get plenty of game time. If you've got a Harry Kane it's different.

I look at it the same as Lloris. You wouldn't say we need to spend what would be huge money on a backup and why would this backup sign. We could've spent most of our budget on Pickford but he'd be mental to sign for us. It's the same with striker for us.

Personally I'd love to sign an attacking mid who could play up front if came to it. Beyond that I think it's either King level or another youth prospect like Janssen. Think I'd rather just give Janssen another year.
 

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
You expect Harry to play in every League, Cup and CPL match ??? Janssen will be given opportunities and must take them...just like the first half this morning against PSG.....what happened...zippo.
Harry will start EVERY league and Champions League game. No way does he sit out any of those games if fit. You're left with the FA cup and League Cup. About a dozen games if we get to the final in each. But by the time we reach the quarter finals Harry will be picked for them too. Signing for Spurs as a striker means sitting on your arse all season waiting for Harry to get injured.
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
No striker able to score at even half Kane's rate would come, as even half of Kane's output is enough to justify a starting spot and huge salary/ huge fee at a top club (see Morata).

The other noteworthy point is that, to score at a semi decent rate without a run of games is nigh on and impossible in this league. So we'll never know with him until Harry is out for two/ three months and missed ten games in a row, which we don't want.

Thankfully we have a great array of goal scorers from the support positions, with Son, Dele and Eriksen all double figures players, so the main remit for anyone deputising in Harry's absence is to provide a focal point and lead the line. Janssen certainly does this. I'm not sure who out there, at a 'second choice striker' price, would do any better.
 

Khilari

Plumber. Sort of.
Jun 19, 2008
3,461
5,287
Harry will start EVERY league and Champions League game. No way does he sit out any of those games if fit. You're left with the FA cup and League Cup. About a dozen games if we get to the final in each. But by the time we reach the quarter finals Harry will be picked for them too. Signing for Spurs as a striker means sitting on your arse all season waiting for Harry to get injured.
You're right - but statistically speaking, Harry Kane needing to be rested, getting injured or suspended is higher as each season goes by, as he gets older, as we play him more.

So the 'backup striker' will most likely get to play in the league and in enough games of importance, but will have to be ready to pounce, like Kieran Trippier, Harry Winks, Ryan Mason and Heung Min Son did, rather than assume this.
 
Last edited:

goughie1966

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2008
5,150
17,874
You're right - but statistically speaking, Harry Kane needing to be resting, getting injured or suspended is higher as each season goes by, as he gets older, as we play him more.

So the 'backup striker' will most likely get to play in the league and in enough games of importance, but will have to be ready to pounce, like Kieran Trippier, Harry Winks, Ryan Mason and Heung Min Son did, rather than assume this.
You're right of course. But very few posters can provide an alternative. @Krule has provided a good shout in Josh King, but that's all we have from the anti Janssen brigade. I can't think of alternatives either and I just don't think there's any out there
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Ideally, you want a player like martial to offer the width and striker role. Not for a minute suggesting martial because money etc, but a similar player. Names....I have no idea, but I'd keep Janssen around for sure.

Son
 

daveduvet

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2008
5,646
15,358
(I'd be relatively keen on King; it's feasible that he and Janssen could 'gel' too.)
I actually believe Janssen is a lovely footballer and out of respect for his professionalism and our financial investment we have to give him another year at least to bed in. Lamela is a good example of someone who took time to adapt; and Son was man of the match on at least twice last season too following a bitty first season.
Maybe Wembley might be better for Janssen ? He has a lot on his shoulders to be expected to be an on fire striker when working in Kane's shadow.
So far I like what I see of him, but I won't deny my inner child wants to beat at my keyboard demanding more - I've just reasoned, however, that Poch has the expertise to judge what he feels is best for the team/squad etc.
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
You're right of course. But very few posters can provide an alternative. @Krule has provided a good shout in Josh King, but that's all we have from the anti Janssen brigade. I can't think of alternatives either and I just don't think there's any out there
Here is a list of some of the criteria one would have to go by to find somebody "better".
Initial cost: Under 20M
Age: 23 or under
In the contention for his national team: Yes
Proven on a senior level: Yes
Represents a possible attitude problem: No

Janssen is one of the top strikers in the PL in his age bracket. Very few players (eg. Rashford) are as young/younger and better.
 
Top