What's new

Harry Kane

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
13,998
20,756
He's more than goals and money. He's the identity of the club and connection with the fans. Selling him and signing a couple of (very good) players that RM were willing to give up for him means that Spurs still lose.
 

agrdavidsfan

Ledley's Knee!
Aug 25, 2005
10,918
13,352
Actually dont think I would swap or sell him for anything.

He's priceless to what this club is trying to acheive and as long as Harry is happy to stay who cares money cant buy happiness
 

THFCjosh

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
632
2,229
Is someone offering or do we get to just make up our own swaps?
Would you swap Kane for £50million, a lifetime supply of any biscuit, and one night with the celebrity of your choosing to do what you want?
Yes...Record a sex tape, release sex tape, make money, buy HK back with the money I made from sex tape.

It worked for Kim Kardashian, I don't see why it wouldn't work for me.
 

the yid

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2010
2,559
11,473
Jesus Vallejo, Mateo Kovacic, Isco, Borja Mayoral, Marco Asensio, Gareth Bale and £100m and I MIGHT consider it
 

Dov67

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2005
3,318
10,212
I dont necessarily see him staying his whole career with us, but there's one thing I am certain of........he will not be sold this summer.

Can you imagine, after spending north of half a billion on a new stadium, Levy then throws cold water over the whole club by selling Kane (or Dele for that matter) before we move in......so rather than starting the new season full of optimism and excitement in our shiny new ground, we are all depressed?

Forget it.......any journalist who peddles this BS is either a total moron or just a shit stirrer.
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,344
129,918
Throw in the Bernabeu as a round the year training camp in the sun and I'd still tell them to get fucked. Kane is Tottenham right now. It has clicked. Can't guarantee any other player in the world doing that. As the saying goes a bird who scores goals for fun in the hand is worth 3 players past their prime in the bush.
 

Luka Van der Bale

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
6,041
13,611
BBC Sports reporting at this point is probably the worst it has ever been. All they really do anymore is peddle small rag rumors for clicks.
Sorry but this isn’t true. BBC gossip is exactly as advertised - they sum up the stories in the papers. They aren’t claiming to support or agree with those stories. If something is on the BBC main page it is likely to be extremely legit.
 

ERO

The artist f.k.a Steffen Freund - Mentalist ****
Jun 8, 2003
5,910
5,226
Throw in the Bernabeu as a round the year training camp in the sun and I'd still tell them to get fucked. Kane is Tottenham right now. It has clicked. Can't guarantee any other player in the world doing that. As the saying goes a bird who scores goals for fun in the hand is worth 3 players past their prime in the bush.

dwight-schrute.jpg
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,344
129,918
Sorry but this isn’t true. BBC gossip is exactly as advertised - they sum up the stories in the papers. They aren’t claiming to support or agree with those stories. If something is on the BBC main page it is likely to be extremely legit.
They're not against using it as their own bit of clickbait though, are they?

Screen Shot 2017-10-11 at 11.52.55.png
 

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
13,998
20,756
Sorry but this isn’t true. BBC gossip is exactly as advertised - they sum up the stories in the papers. They aren’t claiming to support or agree with those stories. If something is on the BBC main page it is likely to be extremely legit.
The stories themselves, maybe. The way they promote these stories online is exactly the same as any other clickbait site, and I bet that is how most people find their way to the BBC football pages.

Sure, it's rumours and doesn't claim to be anything more, but they knowingly take false sources and circulate it. They should be better than the average clicks site but instead they help to legitimise and spread rubbish gossip from sites that should be ignored.

People will quote the story and add 'the BBC says...' - which is wrong - but it adds weight to utter nonsense. You'll also see it in the newspapers where they will say 'according to a report in...' and name another paper, which is just as bad when they are repeating something they haven't verified or is so obviously false, like this story. Which leads you to believe it is just for the clicks.
 
Top