- Sep 28, 2004
- 45,893
- 68,893
You should write in to LillyWhite House with that.It would be nice if levy could squeeze in enough extra seats to make it 61,882 capacity, referencing the founding year.
You should write in to LillyWhite House with that.It would be nice if levy could squeeze in enough extra seats to make it 61,882 capacity, referencing the founding year.
People who say it’s too small are living in cloud cuckoo land. Firstly with the travel links, and secondly look at this season, any match that isn’t box office and we have a half full Wembley.punkyguy on skyscrapercity: 1. I forget what the actual question was but Levy said "The stadium *will* be ready". Those words with slight emphasis on the "will". No caveats or anything.
2. Someone said the stadium is too small. He was initially to be 56k but is now "around 61 and a half thousand" Exact words. He then said There should be a few more seats in here-and-there before it's finished, which seems astonishing that they are making changes so late. He said that the big issue was transport and intimated that it was really hard to 61k past the council.
punkyguy on skyscrapercity: 1. I forget what the actual question was but Levy said "The stadium *will* be ready". Those words with slight emphasis on the "will". No caveats or anything.
2. Someone said the stadium is too small. He was initially to be 56k but is now "around 61 and a half thousand" Exact words. He then said There should be a few more seats in here-and-there before it's finished, which seems astonishing that they are making changes so late. He said that the big issue was transport and intimated that it was really hard to [get] 61k past the council.
It would be nice if levy could squeeze in enough extra seats to make it 61,882 capacity, referencing the founding year.
Just came up with it, mate. Stroke of genius if you ask me...Missed ths post, I believe I read somewhere that this was the intention at one point. Did you come up with this idea or is it based off something you've read before.
Ah, I did a bit of research and it's in this article http://www.talkingbaws.com/2016/11/...ottenhams-new-stadium-consultation-committee/
but nothing else since
I may be wrong but wasn't it 62k+ against Stoke last week-end? They certainly aren't box office.
I agree. But we are surely going to be paying more to watch games at the new WHL than we are at Wembley this season. The cheaper tickets at Wembley are definitely helping bolster attendances.
Maybe Levi will introduce lower GA prices for these games, like at Wembley, IF we end up with less spectators and the ground looking less than full. All depends on demand and I can't imagine that being low for the first 2 or 3 seasons unless we implode. The new stadium itself will generate tremendous interest so I'm confident we'll be fine.
As long as we keep progressing with the team/squad's achievements I can't see a problem arising.
All IMHO of course.
Good pointI agree. But we are surely going to be paying more to watch games at the new WHL than we are at Wembley this season. The cheaper tickets at Wembley are definitely helping bolster attendances.
This guy is definitely a project manager by profession, so much management speak in there! LOL...Mattilda Collywobs has posted on Glory Glory
"A completion schedule is in place and it is this which informs the degree of confidence. At present, various packages have completed quicker than others but this isn’t necessarily always ideal as there are timing dependencies. A major forthcoming milestone is to achieve full stadium height and it is now anticipated this will be achieved in appromately four weeks time. This is ahead of schedule. Beyond, focus will then turn to elevating the roof structure, a process which has several dependencies notwithstanding plant decommissioning. It is envisaged that activity around the site envelope will remain for a considerable period of time, but this activity will largely focus upon developing the SDL - not the stadium, which will only have very minor legacy activity and largely speaking, this shouldn’t be visible".
I was beginning to think everyone involved had only been educated to a GCSE level.This guy is definitely a project manager by profession, so much management speak in there! LOL...
I dunno wat you meen......I was beginning to think everyone involved had only been educated to a GCSE level.
This guy is definitely a project manager by profession, so much management speak in there! LOL...
There was a rumour that matilda collywobs might be donna cullen i believe.
There was a rumour that matilda collywobs might be donna cullen i believe.