- Aug 27, 2013
- 13,456
- 39,042
26Who knows, but the more we debate it, the closer Grealish gets to the dotted line.
27
26Who knows, but the more we debate it, the closer Grealish gets to the dotted line.
27
I appreciate this is a Jack Grealish thread but AB is still pumping millions into Chelsea..
The first thing to point out is that, for all their success on the pitch and the revenue that generates, Chelsea have benefited from large amounts of shareholder subsidy in recent years.
..
Abramovich has been pouring, on average, around £60 million a year into Chelsea. Technically, it has not been largesse but loans, and the most recent count, made in June last year, said the club owed its owner some £1.2 billion. This is repayable within 18 months of Abramovich calling it in -- a commitment Chelsea would naturally be unable to meet if he did -- although at that time he did not express any intention of demanding repayment.
I appreciate this is a Jack Grealish thread but AB is still pumping millions into Chelsea..
The first thing to point out is that, for all their success on the pitch and the revenue that generates, Chelsea have benefited from large amounts of shareholder subsidy in recent years.
..
Edit link added
http://www.espn.in/football/club/ch...-on-or-else-their-present-and-future-are-grim
Abramovich has been pouring, on average, around £60 million a year into Chelsea. Technically, it has not been largesse but loans, and the most recent count, made in June last year, said the club owed its owner some £1.2 billion. This is repayable within 18 months of Abramovich calling it in -- a commitment Chelsea would naturally be unable to meet if he did -- although at that time he did not express any intention of demanding repayment.
Can he stump up though without a visa? Really don't know how it works.
Probably better in the chelsea thread.
If they are both equal then doesn't really matter as both the sameAsked in the fernandes thread but didn't get an answer. Is it a case of fernandes or grealish? If so, who would you go for all things being equal?
Asked in the fernandes thread but didn't get an answer. Is it a case of fernandes or grealish? If so, who would you go for all things being equal?
All things equal I think you take Grealish just because of the Internationals quota.
Think we have a decent relationship with themI wonder if they would share the same sentiments if the position was reversed.........
That has to be a consideration. But on footballing ability? I haven't seen either so can't judge.
I've seen Grealish more than Bruno...and by that I mean I have seen a few highlights of Grealish but have not clocked "Play" on the Bruno video!That has to be a consideration. But on footballing ability? I haven't seen either so can't judge.
Depends which forum you're on. Villa fans have seen both in the same team last season so are able to use that comparison. Onomah is younger though so that has to be taken into account as well.
Just popping down the beach, will shift my bits over when I get back...