- Jan 28, 2011
- 1,849
- 4,230
I'll be honest and say that I've not read all of the pages in this thread, so not sure if it's been confirmed or not, but there is an AIA ad on the Spurs Media Watch page on the OS that has us in the leaked home shirt.
Unless we are seeing different ads that's the 17/18 home shirt.I'll be honest and say that I've not read all of the pages in this thread, so not sure if it's been confirmed or not, but there is an AIA ad on the Spurs Media Watch page on the OS that has us in the leaked home shirt.
Any leaks on the 19/20 training gear?
I always prefer that stuff as they feel less like a walking advertisement.
Farking amazing!
Not a colour scheme I’d associate with chelsea, more Man UChelsea's 3rd leaked, which might give us an idea of what our 3rd could look like, design wise, but in sky blue and Navy obviously
View attachment 50941
Love the away kit, but the badge looks far too big to be real.
This article says that he is wearing our new kit.
Seems strange that nothing else is mentioned anywhere else. But also would be strange if it wasn't the new kit, seeing that he is sponsored by Nike too. I am sure they would not let him wear anything snyde.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/tennis/nick-kyrgios-wimbledon-tottenham-kit-10721191
Not enough to offset the loss of losing the AIA dealWest Ham are selling their home shirt without the sponsor on as an "U18 kit"
I know it's to do with the betting company, but imagine how many shirts Spurs would sell without the red sponsor.
Does anyone know if we plan on bringing out a green kit again? I have to say personally it is my favourite shirt of my lifetime and I've had a shirt every year since 1980. I'm also very superstitious, on the 11 times I've worn it during a game we have 9 wins.
COYS
View attachment 50954
West Ham are selling their home shirt without the sponsor on as an "U18 kit"
I know it's to do with the betting company, but imagine how many shirts Spurs would sell without the red sponsor.
It is sneaky indeed, but I can't exactly see how they can be penalised for it as selling kids a shirt with a betting company's logo is probably frowned upon! Most 17 year old lads will have stopped growing, so they'll have to make them in S, M, L and XL sizes.Haha the sneaky fuckers
I suspect it won't be too long before they're hearing from Betway's lawyers.
It is sneaky indeed, but I can't exactly see how they can be penalised for it as selling kids a shirt with a betting company's logo is probably frowned upon! Most 17 year old lads will have stopped growing, so they'll have to make them in S, M, L and XL sizes.
Good idea if I'm honest.
Yep, true. Did we have plain shirts in youth tournaments etc. when we were sponsored by Mansion? Same situation I presume.I guess ultimately it depends on the contract with their sponsors. If the agreed fee from Betway was based on the fact that their logo would be printed on all the shirts, then West Ham are surely in breach of contract by doing this? If Betway knew in advance that the logo wouldn't be printed on some shirts then presumably they would've paid less for the sponsorship.
Obviously there's the whole gambling/kids issue but if this was the plan then it should've been agreed in the initial negotiations. Maybe it was though to be fair, we don't really know.