What's new

What Our Opponents' Fans Are Saying About Us 23/24

IfiHadTheWings

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2013
3,685
11,676
Some of them have a very heightened opinion of their club 🤣
Those European cups back when Jesus was a boy (i know i sound like a prick) will do that for ya.

I know a lot of our clubs best work was done back then but i find it cringy when clubs who have spent the past 3 decades yo-yoing down the leagues sing about winning a competition 40 years ago.

all that Champions of Europe you'll never sing that from Forest/Villa fans do nothing for me.


First non-league club to win an FA CUP you'll never sing thatttt! :cautious:
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,676
78,543
Always feel like we should reply with "Champions League music you'll never hear that" to some of those chants. It was so long ago and Champions League is totally different level now, the likes of Villa and Forest haven't even been in it. Then you get these West Ham fans chanting about Champions of Europe which would mean we could actually sing that with our UEFA Cup or cup winners Cup. I guess every club just thinks up ways to brag about their own club without necessarily any logic.
 

TheChosenOne

A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
Dec 13, 2005
48,179
50,226
To win the European Cup back in the eighties it was a total of 9 matches. 4x2 legged then a one off final.

To win our ECWC in 1963 it was 7 matches - 3x2 legged and a final.

It's a lot harder in the present format (which will change next year)
 

Col_M

Pointing out the Obvious
Feb 28, 2012
22,788
45,915
Those European cups back when Jesus was a boy (i know i sound like a prick) will do that for ya.

I know a lot of our clubs best work was done back then but i find it cringy when clubs who have spent the past 3 decades yo-yoing down the leagues sing about winning a competition 40 years ago.

all that Champions of Europe you'll never sing that from Forest/Villa fans do nothing for me.


First non-league club to win an FA CUP you'll never sing thatttt! :cautious:

To be fair, I think you are underplaying Brian Clough's contribution here,
 

Timbo Tottenham

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2006
2,342
6,320
To win the European Cup back in the eighties it was a total of 9 matches. 4x2 legged then a one off final.

To win our ECWC in 1963 it was 7 matches - 3x2 legged and a final.

It's a lot harder in the present format (which will change next year)
CAn't remember of the top of my head, but didn't we have an incredibly easy run to our European win, including a bye in one of the rounds.
 

TheChosenOne

A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
Dec 13, 2005
48,179
50,226
CAn't remember of the top of my head, but didn't we have an incredibly easy run to our European win, including a bye in one of the rounds.
IMG_1561.jpeg
 

Thenewcat

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
3,039
10,499
Always feel like we should reply with "Champions League music you'll never hear that" to some of those chants. It was so long ago and Champions League is totally different level now, the likes of Villa and Forest haven't even been in it. Then you get these West Ham fans chanting about Champions of Europe which would mean we could actually sing that with our UEFA Cup or cup winners Cup. I guess every club just thinks up ways to brag about their own club without necessarily any logic.
West Ham’s trophy is absolutely not the equivalent of our UEFA or Cup Winner’s cups. It’s a 3rd tier trophy you can only be in if you fail to qualify for 2 others so it’s only historic equivalent was the intertoto, albeit clubs take this a bit more seriously.

The Cup Winners Cup was variable in quality - it could have teams who came second in tough leagues or lower decision teams - but the uefa was harder to win then the European cup most years because you were guaranteed to have multiple high finishing teams from the strongest leagues in it.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,676
78,543
West Ham’s trophy is absolutely not the equivalent of our UEFA or Cup Winner’s cups. It’s a 3rd tier trophy you can only be in if you fail to qualify for 2 others so it’s only historic equivalent was the intertoto, albeit clubs take this a bit more seriously.

The Cup Winners Cup was variable in quality - it could have teams who came second in tough leagues or lower decision teams - but the uefa was harder to win then the European cup most years because you were guaranteed to have multiple high finishing teams from the strongest leagues in it.
I didn't say it was the equivalent. I was saying that if we used their logic we could claim we were champions of Europe too due to our other European success. So in that case when teams say "champions of Europe you'll never song that" by West Ham logic we could sing that by using the tag for any old European title.
 

MiakSarawak

Well-Known Member
Jun 6, 2006
257
672
Believe me, Villa fans have always been this deluded. They won a bunch a bunch trophies in the 1800s so they're still an absolutely massive club. They are only a notch below pre-Klopp Liverpool fans in that regard. They piped down for a few years recently due to their relegation but now, after one decent season, they're back up to full voice again.
Sounds familiar
 

Locotoro

Prince of Zamunda
Sep 2, 2004
9,453
14,215
Wow a few wins under Dracula 🧛‍♂️ and they’re now completely deluded lol, can’t wait for them to start collapsing once they get some actual injuries because of Europe etc.

We absolutely played them off the park the other week.
At least we know why Villa are so strong through the middle....the manager hates crosses

;)
 

BehindEnemyLines

Twisting a Melon with the Rev. Black Grape
Apr 13, 2006
4,659
13,513
To win the European Cup back in the eighties it was a total of 9 matches. 4x2 legged then a one off final.

To win our ECWC in 1963 it was 7 matches - 3x2 legged and a final.

It's a lot harder in the present format (which will change next year)
The European cup was a lot harder to get into as you had to be champions......however, if you did get in it (with all due respect to the smaller leagues) that also meant that there were really only 3 or 4 top teams in it (champions of England, Spain, Germany & Italy), so as long as you avoided them it was a pretty clear route to the semis. The current format means there are far more top teams from those top leagues, and less fillers.

It also meant the EUFA cup was far harder back then as you had the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place teams from all the big leagues, meaning there was a higher proportion of good vs fillers.....it was arguably a more difficult competition to win than the European Cup.
 

Riandor

COB Founder
May 26, 2004
9,424
11,651
3rd tier or not… WH have won a European trophy and frankly we would be more than happy to have won it, had we bothered to take it seriously enough.

We are not in a position to be snobbish about silverware of any official calibre.
But anyway, what are our opponents saying?
 
Last edited:

bomberH

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
28,471
168,308
3rd tier or not… WH have won a European trophy and frankly we would be more than happy to have won had we bothered to take it seriously enough.

We are not in a position to be snobbish about silverware of any official calibre.
But anyway, what are our opponents saying?
That may be the case but it’s still a fact that as a bigger club, you have to fail in the league to qualify for this tournament. Apart from that covid season, the reason we wouldn’t have been able to qualify for this tournament over the last 15 years is because we finished too high in the league to do so (bar our abomination of a season last year). It’s for teams like Brentford, Wolves, West Ham and Villa etc… teams that tend to finish mid table at best and aren't generally challengers for the top 6. Villa would be devastated if they were in the Europa Conference league next season now they’ve tasted a bit of league ‘success’.

It’s not much different to organising a European tournament for the team finishing 17th each season. The ‘Just Avoided Relegation Europa Celebration Conference’.

If we were in it, I’d want to win it but if we were in it, it means we’re failing as a club. Whereas when West Ham were in it, it was seen as a massive upward step for them. So if you’re ever talking to a West Ham fan, even if they’re nice and sensible, you should always be thinking ‘looooooser’ in your mind otherwise you’re not doing them justice.
 

Thenewcat

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
3,039
10,499
3rd tier or not… WH have won a European trophy and frankly we would be more than happy to have won had we bothered to take it seriously enough.

We are not in a position to be snobbish about silverware of any official calibre.
But anyway, what are our opponents saying?
We were forced to withdraw. But in any case, we didn’t win it last season because we were in the knockout stages of the Champions League. If we’re playing in it we’ve failed the year before.
 
Last edited:

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,496
38,618
That may be the case but it’s still a fact that as a bigger club, you have to fail in the league to qualify for this tournament. Apart from that covid season, the reason we wouldn’t have been able to qualify for this tournament over the last 15 years is because we finished too high in the league to do so (bar our abomination of a season last year). It’s for teams like Brentford, Wolves, West Ham and Villa etc… teams that tend to finish mid table at best and aren't generally challengers for the top 6. Villa would be devastated if they were in the Europa Conference league next season now they’ve tasted a bit of league ‘success’.

It’s not much different to organising a European tournament for the team finishing 17th each season. The ‘Just Avoided Relegation Europa Celebration Conference’.

If we were in it, I’d want to win it but if we were in it, it means we’re failing as a club. Whereas when West Ham were in it, it was seen as a massive upward step for them. So if you’re ever talking to a West Ham fan, even if they’re nice and sensible, you should always be thinking ‘looooooser’ in your mind otherwise you’re not doing them justice.
That's as much of an indictment of European competitions. The old format of European cup/UEFA cup/Cup Winners Cup was so much stronger.
 

bomberH

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
28,471
168,308
Typed like any five year old would.

"Spurs cant relaly complain about injuries now. Only bentacur, van de leen and maddison"
The best thing about that is someone else then mentioning ‘VDL’ afterwards.

It’s like when I was talking about Ashley Phillips in his thread a few months back and called him Ashley Williams for some reason, then the next poster called him Ashley Williams too and we managed to confuse the fuck out of everyone.
 

Frozen_Waffles

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2005
3,784
9,630
That may be the case but it’s still a fact that as a bigger club, you have to fail in the league to qualify for this tournament. Apart from that covid season, the reason we wouldn’t have been able to qualify for this tournament over the last 15 years is because we finished too high in the league to do so (bar our abomination of a season last year). It’s for teams like Brentford, Wolves, West Ham and Villa etc… teams that tend to finish mid table at best and aren't generally challengers for the top 6. Villa would be devastated if they were in the Europa Conference league next season now they’ve tasted a bit of league ‘success’.

It’s not much different to organising a European tournament for the team finishing 17th each season. The ‘Just Avoided Relegation Europa Celebration Conference’.

If we were in it, I’d want to win it but if we were in it, it means we’re failing as a club. Whereas when West Ham were in it, it was seen as a massive upward step for them. So if you’re ever talking to a West Ham fan, even if they’re nice and sensible, you should always be thinking ‘looooooser’ in your mind otherwise you’re not doing them justice.

I remember when Jol was in charge and we started getting into the UEFA cup (yeah I know the standard is much lower in the conference cup), but I still loved watching us against European sides. Not so much in the ECL but that was because we were crap.

West Ham won a trophy, and it may be the least of the European Cups, but it's something. For clubs like Villa, Brighton and West Ham I imagine it's great being involved in those competitions.

If we end up in the European conference league next year I'd like us to go for it and win it and I'd be happy if we did.

When you have 6 teams (NU, Chelsea, United, city, Arsenal and Liverpool) in the league who are spending ridiculous money, finishing 7th and winning a cup is a fantastic achievement. They should celebrate and sing champions of Europe.

Short of being owned by a country it's incredibly unlikely that these teams will ever get into the champions league.

The only (fair way) to do it is by growing the clubs income (like we've done), but this has taken a couple of decades and good ownership.

Anyway, I don't think we should belittle it, especially us.

As for the Forrest fans, they seem like a reasonable bunch and makes a fresh change to Villa and West Ham fans.
 
Top