The alternative is them getting Poch. We should be mounting a disinformation campaign supporting Mourinho's candidacy, not engage in this sort of reckless truth telling.
The attention will be massive on them, and they won't be used to it. Kickoff times shunted, world media there, going to be interesting. Long waits between games isn't always ideal, either- I don't remember it helping us back in 05-06 when we had a 40 game season.
I agree that we'll never get a better chance, or at least this side won't get a better chance. Don't think there is the will at Chelsea to spend £250 million, especially with the new ground to fund, and with a stellar academy unused.
Commercially, they kill us and will for a long time to come. Ings and Clyne would make the same choice and opt for no European football given the wages on offer.
I both agree with this (that the chance is a rare one), but also feel that it's a lot harder to buy success than is generally made out. There is an interesting chapter in Soccernomics about the percentage of transfers that succeed (it's very low). There is a reason why Wenger buys one player per...
Not sure that the rest of the team is coming up short in terms of goal scoring. If Eriksen or whoever took the penalties, they'd be there or thereabouts 1st in the league for goals excluding top scorer, wouldn't they?
We need a focal point for midweek games and to allow Harry to rest. We could...
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.