What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 27th January 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sweech

Ruh Roh Ressegnon
Jun 27, 2013
6,752
16,378
As usual the 'ITK' discussion page is filled with a load of nonsense
You were one of those kids who at the end of the day if the teacher didn't give out homework or ask for the assignment that was due that day you would point it out, wouldn't you?
 

SDogg

Stevenage Yid
Aug 1, 2013
731
8,090
You were one of those kids who at the end of the day if the teacher didn't give out homework or ask for the assignment that was due that day you would point it out, wouldn't you?

no, just fed up with having to read through all the crap, got twitter for that
 

MilkyBarYid

Formerly known as skb3
Aug 23, 2004
1,737
2,250
no, just fed up with having to read through all the crap, got twitter for that

Skim read or better still look out for the ratings, if I am limited for time I look out for the blue "i" ratings or posts with "Winner" or many "agree/like" ratings.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,323
146,781
You also have the SC ITK thread, where you don't have to read any discussion at all.

That's all good and well if there is discussion about itk going on in here. Or if the RO thread got updated with any degree of reliability. There isn't. And it doesn't.
 

Geyzer Soze

Fearlessly the idiot faced the crowd
Aug 16, 2010
26,056
63,361
That's all good and well if there is discussion about itk going on in here. Or if the RO thread got updated with any degree of reliability. There isn't. And it doesn't.
I think it does tbf. Any ITK is put in there. There just happens not to be much, if any, hence the ITK ticker is quiet, and hence it's quiet in here too]

No need to start bitchin' at each other and no need to start grassing really
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,323
146,781
I think it does tbf. Any ITK is put in there. There just happens not to be much, if any, hence the ITK ticker is quiet, and hence it's quiet in here too

Sometimes that's the case, but last summer it wasn't updated regularly, there was a lot of stuff in this thread that didn't always make it to the RO. So it's not just a case of simply using one thread or the other. I can understand when people get frustrated, when they log on to SC and see another three pages on this thread, and think there is probably some interesting itk then come in here and it's just three pages of off topic drivel.
 

Insomnia

Twisted Firestarter
Jan 18, 2006
20,209
55,574
*uploads picture of Keith Burkinshaw outside of WHL

"I remember when there used to be 50 page per day in the ITK threads over there"
 

EJWTartanSpur

SC Supporter
Jan 29, 2011
4,811
10,103
F*** me it's 5 pages in two days during a transfer window. Hardly having to wade through it all are we.

Totally. I remember the times when you had to trawl through 30 pages of chat EVERY DAY ! Sometimes it was closer to 70 pages depending on what had happened
 
Last edited:

whitechina

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2012
4,262
9,196
Skim read or better still look out for the ratings, if I am limited for time I look out for the blue "i" ratings or posts with "Winner" or many "agree/like" ratings.
Yeah but for i ratings @sergeant meat curtains had a great answer for that in the summer!
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
That's all good and well if there is discussion about itk going on in here. Or if the RO thread got updated with any degree of reliability. There isn't. And it doesn't.

I don't bother with the RO thread as it all makes its way in here soon enough.

The biggest issue surrounding the nonsense and lack of ITK stuff is.........





.......there isn't any.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
F*** me it's 5 pages in two days during a transfer window. Hardly having to wade through it all are we.

Agree and in past windows going through the thread as if it was "live" was all part of the fun with much great banter together with the nonsense. Apart from the cabbages stuff, which was genuinely annoying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top