- Jun 27, 2013
- 6,752
- 16,378
I totally agree, but sometimes people get tunnel vision on money spent and never even ponder the how/why.They were spending the Lukaku and Barkley cash, that they expected to be incoming before the window closed. nothing more than what Liverpool or ourselves did when Bale and Suarez were sold. In the same way I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of their Summer incomings didn't eventually work out for them given time. I don't think it will be Ronnie that see's the benefit from that though personally. This is the third occasion now in recent times we have seen this exact same strategy backfire. Sell your best players and replace with a number of inferior ones, does not equate to ambition, it basically has the opposite effect and will probably cost the manager his job.
In fact a lot of people are even crediting this new rich owner. Who actually isn't all that rich and in the end I wouldn't be surprised if Everton's transfer books balanced out to about the level of their contemporaries.
In fairness to Everton I think the pundits have been harsh on them for the money spent. Liverpool and ourselves have already shown the sell a star player and use the money to bring in several good players does not work. So them claiming that with that money spent they should be challenging top 4 is bollocks. Especially when some of that top 4 spend near double what they just did through multiple seasons. I also thought Mourinhos earlier dig at them was a classic Mourinho dig where it annoys the opposition but also shows a complete lack of self-awareness and is incredibly hypocritical. He claimed with that spend Everton should be challenging top 4. Correct me if I'm wrong but did Mourinho not just spend similar money to finish in 6th place last year?