- Jul 29, 2011
- 6,924
- 12,436
It used to be StokePlus it was hull.... They are always good at taking player off our hands.
It used to be StokePlus it was hull.... They are always good at taking player off our hands.
That's it though, he has all the natural attributes but gets caught out once virtually every match because he doesn't concentrate fully for 90 minutes at a time. Perfect for Liverpool, then.I think VVD is decent, he does get caught out, but a really good centre back.
Southampton have become a very defensive team. The team is set up not to concede, he will look a far better player sitting at the back of all that protection than he will gung ho Liverpool.
VVD imo is very similar to Gary Cahill when he was at Bolton, clearly better than a mid table/ mediocre prem side, but doesnt quite have the natural top six talent. That's not meant to be a massive negative because Cahill has had begrudgly a very good career at Chelsea, while scoring some big goals and getting some big blocks in. But that might not be good enough at Liverpool.
Yeah thats why I said that might not be good enough for/at liverpool. Chelsea's midfield and style of play provides a lot of cover and protection. But it still is stunning that Cahill has won 5 major trophies at Chelsea, which when considering our squad over the past three years stings.Cahill also played next to Terry, VVD won't have that a Pool
VVD imo is very similar to Gary Cahill when he was at Bolton, clearly better than a mid table/ mediocre prem side, but doesnt quite have the natural top six talent. That's not meant to be a massive negative because Cahill has had begrudgly a very good career at Chelsea, while scoring some big goals and getting some big blocks in. But that might not be good enough at Liverpool.
VVD is quick and strong in the air, considering Liverpool play a high line and are shit in the air you can see how he would make a difference.
Is he that quick? I remember Kane making a mug of him and VVD couldn't catch him
He's certainly no Dawson, but I dont think his pace is a large strength. VVd is definately a beast in the air.VVD is quick and strong in the air, considering Liverpool play a high line and are shit in the air you can see how he would make a difference.
Everyone has already mentioned Kane mugging him off for speed, but hasn't Kane and Alli beaten him in the air for goals once each?VVD is quick and strong in the air, considering Liverpool play a high line and are shit in the air you can see how he would make a difference.
Soton fans actually point to his ability to win headers as one of his weaknesses. But I dunno, when I see him play I tend to notice loads of what's called "childrens deseases" in my native tongue. Don't know if you have a better term for it, but generally quite a few flaws that should have been plucked off him if he was as good as his hype suggests.
As for Liverpool, their flaws are systemic. They tend to create a lot, and actually doesn't concede too many shots. Their trouble is that when the do concede shots, they are often very big chances (typically from 10 yards and in), and it's been a consistent trend all through Klopps time there. Some times they's swarm the opposition and win with a few goals, but if they don't kill games, they'll always be vulnurable.
What actually happened to the complaint about the way they approached VVD? The fact they pulled out and apologised was in effect an admission of guilt, do they not risk sanctions by going in for him again?