What's new

Clattenberg: "My game was to let Tottenham lose the title"

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
Only one thing for it. We have to replay the end of that season over and over until we win it. Same goes for the Ireland v France playoff too. Clattenburg and Henry, both ****s.

Problem is we would lose the game anyway as it was away from home at one of the top six, and we already know the script for this don't we?.
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
The outcome of the title probably wouldn't have been any different. A referee admitting to such levels of unprofessionalism certainly is not 'moot'. Don't forget this is the referee who was suspended for 8 months after sending death threats to someone he owed gambling debts to.

Two things about this part of your post.

Firstly, surely a referee should not be refereeing if he is caught gambling, particularly if he's gambling on football.

Secondly, why the hell was he given only an 8 month ban, should've been for life and why wasn't he locked up, death threats are a criminal offence!!?
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
If he was issuing death threats, why wasn't he prosecuted? The last time I looked, it was a crime to make such threats. Also, sports officials and gambling don't go together. His 8-month suspension should have been a lifetime ban from any football-related activity.

Damn! Beat me to it!!:shifty:
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,369
130,269
Problem is we would lose the game anyway as it was away from home at one of the top six, and we already know the script for this don't we?.
I did say we play it over and over. We would win eventually. Obviously there would be problems handing out medals as some of the players would be retired/dead by the time we won at Stamford Bridge.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
This is just a really strange thing to come out with. I can see his point that he didn't want to be blamed for costing anyone the title, but he's basically admitting to not applying the rules. Did he apply the same rules to the Chelsea players because he didn't want to cost Leicester the title?
After these comments you'd have to question some of the other decisions that he 'missed' in other big games that he's taken charge of.
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
Not entirely blaming him for us throwing a two-goal lead away but it goes to show how important influential figures in the game (who had say in matters) wanted us to blow it, which is exactly how many of us felt at the time.

As @nightgoat mentioned, Chelsea players were clearly trying to wind us up and get in our heads, there was Terry's elbow and some other moments that should have been punished but Clattenberg decided to do nothing as he states "I let them lose their heads and the title". If he hadn't have had this attitude he may have clamped down on a few things first, which would have settled the intense atmosphere, except he let it get out of control - that's his job!

There's a wider issue at play here too. If Clattenberg is owning to this behaviour, how many other refs are of the same mindset? We saw how utterly useless Atkinson was at the weekend. Was he deliberately letting Watford get away with shit? We've had some appalling decisions against us over the years, which does make you wonder "Is the ref deliberately turning a blind eye to favour another team?".

I don't see how something like this can be instantly dismissed. It happens at all levels, in all leagues. Some teams get ridiculous decisions in their favour whereas others get instant punishment. I'm not saying all refs go out there with an agenda to punish one team and let another off with things but as human beings somethings must affect their judgment or their integrity.

I'm of the belief the refs this season in particular are most definitely not treating us with an even hand, it's just so obvious!
 

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
I did say we play it over and over. We would win eventually. Obviously there would be problems handing out medals as some of the players would be retired/dead by the time we won at Stamford Bridge.

Very funny but so true as well.
 
D

Deleted member 27995

This is just a really strange thing to come out with. I can see his point that he didn't want to be blamed for costing anyone the title, but he's basically admitting to not applying the rules. Did he apply the same rules to the Chelsea players because he didn't want to cost Leicester the title?
After these comments you'd have to question some of the other decisions that he 'missed' in other big games that he's taken charge of.
Quite honestly, if anything of that ilk came to light can you imagine the ramifications for the league? Fuck it, not just Clattenburg but any top level official in England? The FA ....

:ROFLMAO:
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
Two things about this part of your post.

Firstly, surely a referee should not be refereeing if he is caught gambling, particularly if he's gambling on football.

Secondly, why the hell was he given only an 8 month ban, should've been for life and why wasn't he locked up, death threats are a criminal offence!!?

He issued a threat to a business associate involved in an electrical company not gambling debts. The threat was "Check you can use our companies (sic) money to fund your legal crusade against me. If not, taking me to court might cause your family some pain."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Here-8217-s-ref-Mark-Clattenburg-banned.html
 

Hazardousman

Audere est Facere
Jul 24, 2013
4,619
8,944
I have been saying for ages we have a problem with the officials in this country, either through incompetency, personal bias or corruption, take your pick.

Some will have people believe that the PL is uncorruptible and every official is 100% professional and comes into each game with a clear mind and no personal motivations, I think that's a load of bollocks and another example of people ignoring blatant examples of officials being unprofessional.

Note, that when I say "corruption" I do not mean refs being paid off specifically to throw games (although I do believe that exists in football) I am talking about how they allow outside influence or their own personal bias to dictate how they approach games which just ties back into what I have said before with how much influence the media has on this game.

The Leicester season and what their players were allowed to get away with made me suspicious, what has happened since and the recent performances of refs (not just in our games but in other PL games) have all but confirmed it to me.

This is why I think we desperately need video refs, Clattenburg is a prime example of a person with a position of influence in a game ignoring the rules and creating his own because of what is said outside of that game, if that isn't unprofessional and a clear indication that these refs do as they please rather than what the games laws state then I don't know what is.

Mike Dean for example, last few games he had seemed desperate to make sure people don't see him as a "spurs fan" I genuinely believe that.

That performance from Atkinson the other day was another blatant example of a ref doing what he wishes rather than following the laws of the game.

I think the problem is they are never held accountable and are protected to the point of being bulletproof, it's a joke, their only job should be to fairly officiate a game, all this personal bias shit and being told how they "even up" games should be shamed as unprofessional.
 
Last edited:

TheChosenOne

A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
Dec 13, 2005
48,098
50,100
I don't suppose he happened to mention Pedro Mendes and Old Trafford in his enlightened memoirs eh ?
 
Last edited:

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,438
All he said is he left it to us to lose it instead of sending us off.

No what he has said is by the laws of the game he should have sent three players off and he chose to ignore the rules.

How many other occasions has he decided to just pick and choose what laws to follow and what to ignore?
 

Hazardousman

Audere est Facere
Jul 24, 2013
4,619
8,944
No what he has said is by the laws of the game he should have sent three players off and he chose to ignore the rules.

How many other occasions has he decided to just pick and choose what laws to follow and what to ignore?

And how many other refs have done the same in this league? I am willing to bet all of them and I am also willing to bet it happens in nearly every game
 
D

Deleted member 27995

Clattenburg left his job as a Premier League official earlier this year to become head of referees in Saudi Arabia.

Says it all really.
 
Top