What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 3rd January

Status
Not open for further replies.

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,173
19,679
Good to see the Transfer Thread back with a bang! :playful:

Like the rest of us, I want us to secure targets as early as possible. To me, the reality of doing that would mean either getting a deal done in January with a loan back, or getting a deal done that can be completed when the window opens on 1 July.

If Levy doesn't do that for Poch this year then he frankly doesn't deserve him. He's spent far too many summers pissing around until the end of August and you can see Poch is frustrated by that.

However, regarding Ross Barkley I don't understand the reaction. I mean, it's Ross Barkley... (n)

As is the case with many players who are either injured for a long time or involved in some lengthy protracted transfer, he has taken on some sort of mythical saviour-like status and the reality would be much more mundane. IMO, he'd have been a fair to decent option for our squad but not a lot more than that.

If you add the fact that he's clearly had a very serious operation on his hamstring which - for a player who relies on explosive bursts - seems like an accident waiting to happen, and we aren't Chelsea. We sign players to actually make a meaningful contribution to the team.

If in 2 months time the hamstring goes again and he's out for another year then Chelsea can just write it off and pay £50m on another back-up. Because they have a Russian billionaire in charge.

If we miss out on Ryan Sessegnon I'd be a lot more gutted.
 

Chris12

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
7,293
13,252
Listen up!!!

STOP slagging off the club regarding RB! I wanted it to happen. There is more than one reason (medical) we pulled out. Sissoko WAS Poch’s signing! End of!

I am fully confident that Poch will be backed 100%! Why? Because if they don’t you know the consequences. I would strongly advise everyone to stop knocking Josh, before we loose him. He has access to this forum through his friends. He is not on it, but hears. If we are not careful he will go.

I will not divulge beyond what I have done who our targets are, or who is in the bag. 2 definitely are. If names come out in media etc, I may rethink that.

Keep friggin backing Tripps over KWP, if you are mad-hint.
Quite like that hint.
 

andyp8080

SC Supporter
Jan 30, 2011
2,098
4,203
In general...

Sissokko plays in nearly every fucking game. If the manager thought he was as shit as some of you he wouldn't, end of story.

This is not ITK, it's just blatantly bloody obvious. Just because you don't rate a player it doesn't mean the manager doesn't.

Ffs it can't really be that difficult to understand. Can it?

Not gambling on Barkley is injury related and nothing more. Sissokko has no bearing or relevance whatsoever!

This is the problem though isn't it. We don't see training..........just the matches. And i think the majority of fans don't rate Sissoko.
We can see with our eyes how poor he often is and so we are left baffled as to what the manager sees that we don't. He is watching the same match as us.

Possibly he is a player that follows instructions to the letter and others perhaps don't and that is why Poch likes him? i don't know........but i wish i did
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
I said before if Barkley needed an operation on his hamstring that’s the most serious type of hamstring injury you can get. Once a player has that kind of injury there will always be a doubt over his future fitness. There’s also a reason no England manager has fancied Barkley and most Everton haven’t. Essentially he’s shown nothing but potential at Everton. The £15m is clearly not the issue. It would be having a high earner on a 5 year contract that you can’t guarantee his fitness. Chelsea can afford that gamble we can’t. I think it’s probably as simple as that.
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,221
64,288
I said before if Barkley needed an operation on his hamstring that’s the most serious type of hamstring injury you can get. Once a player has that kind of injury there will always be a doubt over his future fitness. There’s also a reason no England manager has fancied Barkley and most Everton haven’t. Essentially he’s shown nothing but potential at Everton. The £15m is clearly not the issue. It would be having a high earner on a 5 year contract that you can’t guarantee his fitness. Chelsea can afford that gamble we can’t. I think it’s probably as simple as that.

Please can you stop making sensible conclusions from the information available.

I'd also prefer if you put more capital letters and spelling mistakes in your post. ;)

Warmest regards,

Stoofio X
 

seanwhite1961

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2011
1,089
678
This looks to be primarily a wages issue, with journos saying we weren't willing to go close to what Chelsea are offering in wages(£150k a week?).
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,937
71,353
I don’t think anyone has criticised any of the ITK posters, or questioned any sources etc. All I can see are people (rightly or wrongly) being disappointed with the perceived lack of activity. Surely when someone posts opinion that’s up for discussion isn’t it?
It is up for discussion. Trix has been posting his stuff in the wrong thread, clearly. He’s been posting opinion on Barkley today, not ITK yet it is coming up with the itk box around it. We can debate it. Just probably not in this thread.
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
It is up for discussion. Trix has been posting his stuff in the wrong thread, clearly. He’s been posting opinion on Barkley today, not ITK yet it is coming up with the itk box around it. We can debate it. Just probably not in this thread.

"Not gambling on Barkley is injury related and nothing more"

That sounds like ITK, not opinion.
 

Hercules

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2014
5,711
156,661
If we wanted RB even now, we could of got him. Medically it is a MASSIVE risk, and another factor, which I will not disclose. Close that chapter now please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top