I would say closer to 99.9% a peno but I agree it seems it will only be used when the correct decision in blindingly obvious to all...which is a good thing I guess.
The more I looked at it the more I'm leading towards a penalty. What I thought was him going down before the contact looks more like he was jumping over the opponents leg.
The biggest argument argument against VAR is that it will slow down the game too much. So if you have a hypothetical room of 100 neutrals watching a replay, and 99 say penalty and 1 says not a penalty. Should VAR get involved? We'd all agree yes. The problem with VAR is when it's 90/10 or 80/20 or 70/30. Where is the magical line where it becomes clear and obvious? That is the problem with replay in football, the NFL, and any sport that has interpretations.
Ummm ... no? This is a replay, not a second leg.Wait do away goals count in this now?
The more I looked at it the more I'm leading towards a penalty. What I thought was him going down before the contact looks more like he was jumping over the opponents leg.
The biggest argument argument against VAR is that it will slow down the game too much. So if you have a hypothetical room of 100 neutrals watching a replay, and 99 say penalty and 1 says not a penalty. Should VAR get involved? We'd all agree yes. The problem with VAR is when it's 90/10 or 80/20 or 70/30. Where is the magical line where it becomes clear and obvious? That is the problem with replay in football, the NFL, and any sport that has interpretations.
To be fair, they should have had one already. And yes, I'm glad they didn't get it.Dirty pricks wanting a penalty every time they get in the box against championship team.
YesDoes it mean PKs if it's even after extra time?
Dirty pricks wanting a penalty every time they get in the box against championship team.
Yes. They haven’t changed the rules have they?Does it mean PKs if it's even after extra time?
Shame it'll still cost more to insure him than it will to buy him.The price of Andy Carroll has gone up another £5m today.