- Dec 27, 2014
- 7,405
- 13,785
I think Walcott does have talent. Apart from his pace, he’s always been a good finisher, finding bottom corners with nice crisp strikes. The problem is he was never an elite player, at a time when Arsenal had plenty of them. And Wenger never really knew what to do with him. If he’d have gone to a more middling club earlier and played off a big, strong centre forward, he’d probably have been a very regular goal scorer over the years.
Even so, like you say, he's never looked anything like an "elite" player whereas Sterling has always had the potential to reach that level even though he went through a poor run of form, therefore I don't agree that you can look at what Pep has done with Sterling and assume that he could've done the same with Walcott. Despite both of them probably being over-hyped (as is the fate of most talented young English players) I think Sterling's hype was vastly more justified than the hype around Walcott ever was.
Could Walcott have gone on to better things? Probably. But Pep or no Pep, he never looked like having the potential to reach the same levels as Sterling has/could.