- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
- Thread starter
- #361
I remember your post...and the austerity accountants were on like a flash....
Who says Fulham would have taken £25m last summer?
I remember your post...and the austerity accountants were on like a flash....
Who says Fulham would have taken £25m last summer?
A year ago I posted that Sessegnon was a real talent and we should just offer them £25M and do the deal there and then. People laughed at me and said that was ridiculous money for a 16 year old. Fair enough I suppose but he has come on a good deal since then and we now have the same problem.
Is he now worth £50M? It's really the time to decide because after this he's either going to be out of our price range or a bullet dodged. Either way, realistically it is our last opportunity to sign him.
I find this whole idea that Fulham should be happy with 10-15m or whatever we are willing to pay extremely arrogant, disrespectful and unbecoming.I'm not sure they would have gotten screwed over, say they accepted 10-15m, that would have been enough to run their academy for the next 5 years (just guessing) and would have more than covered the time and money they had invested into him.
I find this whole idea that Fulham should be happy with 10-15m or whatever we are willing to pay extremely arrogant, disrespectful and unbecoming.
Sounds like something a united supporter who thinks it's just inevitable that Harry Kane and Poch are nailed on to move to some mega rich uber club and we should be happy because that is just a fact of our reality, would say.
I thought we did offer 25 million for him last summer.
Eh? What do you mean no? According to Forbes he most certainly is, by a considerable margin too:Another thing - Fulham's owner is worth considerably more than Joe Lewis. He also owns an NFL team.
no they still would have been screwed because they invested and put in the work in Sessegnon and if he didnt sign his contract they would have conservatively lost 70% of his market value. Assuming that his MV is 50m and his tribunal fee would have been 15m. That's the definition of screwed over.I'm not saying they should be happy, I just disagree that they would have been screwed over had they accepted what we offered last year
no they still would have been screwed because they invested and put in the work in Sessegnon and if he didnt sign his contract they would have conservatively lost 70% of his market value. Assuming that his MV is 50m and his tribunal fee would have been 15m. That's the definition of screwed over.
still losing out on half his value, whichever way you look at it would have been an ugly example of indecent modern footballing business practices.The 15m is what I came up with for the tribunal fee (total baseless), the rumors were we offered 25m, for a 16 year old that is not getting screwed over.
still losing out on half his value, whichever way you look at it would have been an ugly example of indecent modern footballing business practices.
I've got hospitality tickets for Fulham v Burton this saturday, seats are just below the directors and I'll be there for about 5 hours with free grub and an open bar. I'll try and find out something about what's going on with RS
Yes becuase if you sell any asset just before it's about to skyrocket then you'd feel a little stupid and cheated.He was not worth 50mill at that time was he? He's a year older now, and prices have inflated massively
They weren't missing out on anything
I thought we did offer 25 million for him last summer.
The point of my previous post was that this is the last chance we will have to make that decision because we sure as hell aren't going to pay £100M for an 18 year old. After this window it will be someone else's turn to take the risk because we will be priced out.
Fulham probably aren't selling this window.
That's down to them but then they are taking the risk. I think if we offered £50M and a loan back till the end of the season they'd very likely take it.