- Sep 20, 2005
- 19,130
- 46,117
Lawro is such a fucking prick
So much shameless Liverpool cheerleading within the TV football community. They don’t even attempt to cover it up.
Lawro is such a fucking prick
Well, money can't buy you brains.
Perhaps he shouldn't have kicked Lamela in the back of the leg, the he'd have nothing to moan about. I maintain that Van Dijk is one of the most overpriced players ever.
So frustrating that if we were after salah we could have got him. 34m plus 90k pw wages. He is exactly what we need
1-3 would have been the just scoreline today.Astounded how little credit we're getting after that second half performance.
Had them on their knees, had Harry scored the first we might still not of won but the chances would of been bloody high.
That doesn't change that there are many controversial decisions regarding the phases of play, and whether or not a player is or isn't active.
Hey, good one idiotZero chance we get anything out of this
So Van Dick has slandered (and libelled) Harry surely thats bringing the game into disrepute and a long ban???
Van Dijk should be more concerned about the pen he conceded.
I'm a former referee and it's so pleasing to read posts from someone who clearly knows their stuff. I take it you are or were a referee too cwy21.There will always be cases where the referees have to make an interpretation. Whether the contact was enough to give a penalty kick or if the player in an offside position was blocking the view of the keeper. You can't write the laws in a way where those types of decisions involving the opinion of the referee are removed. But today's decisions were fairly black and white.
I am a referee in the US. I was starting to think I was alone on SC.I take it you are or were a referee too cwy21.
For others, your posts might make your point much more convincing if you used the word "laws" rather than "rules".