Probably, their president is essentially the French Levy and usually gets top dollar for his players, with Lloris being one of the few exceptions.
Yeah, he wouldn't be cheap that's for sure. I thinl he would go for an amount closer to Lacazette's fee than 100m though, but you never know these days.
"I will choose the destination" is nice but there's probably about 10 words after that lost in translation with all the ifs, ands, and buts that go with a claim like that.
Meh, rather we be looking at a CM than another attacker
I think this kid could be special. Got a wand of a left foot.
He does look good but think a CM is more a priority now we have Moura
ITK suggests we are looking at both. I think Malcom completes our attack. We would then have every kind of weapon, therefore we can rotate to keep players fit and firing, we could alter approach to different opposition and we have many game changers. We'd have what City have - all the tools to maintain results and standards.
For me, Doucoure as Sissoko's replacement, and Malcom only if Lamela goes. De Jong should be brought in as a priority. Still this question mark over a back up to Kane but agree it should be someone who could play on the wing as well. Llorente has to go - we're not using him. The Rose situation is unclear, & if we need a left back, we should go for someone like Alex Telles or Tierney.
LOL.
All I will say is that all is agreed with him and his club. But cautionary note; we know what history tells us.FFS...please not another Hazard scenario. I remember him toying with a few clubs ( ourselves included) as to whom he was going to sign for.
I get what you are saying but in reality it often doesn't work like this.
1. Fuck Sissoko
1. Of course I don't want Sissoko here but whether Pochettino agrees is an entirely different matter.
