What's new

Harry Kane

Hengy1

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2014
2,744
7,424
There's a pic of him leaving on crutches but not sure if it was based on the last injury he got.

387E4DA2-4A77-498B-879B-1CE59ECBA6A4.jpeg
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
Got his figure back though. That's something.

Sorry, I missed your response yesterday so didn’t get chance to mark it as funny. Nice one!

Hope he doesn’t get back on the biscuits and cakes now though if he’s out injured for a while! :ROFLMAO:
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,680
104,957
I liked the way Jan said that yeah it’s a shame to lose Harry because he’s a good player but we’ve got others who can step up. Such a good attitude.
 

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,208
114,979
I liked the way Jan said that yeah it’s a shame to lose Harry because he’s a good player but we’ve got others who can step up. Such a good attitude.

We proved it today too. Wasn't a win by the skin of our teeth either, scoring four without your main goal scorer no matter who the opposition is is impressive.
 

Hercules

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2014
5,712
156,666
Not according to the whispers ‘allegedly’ coming out of HK’s mouth. He definitely is telling people already he is confident that not that bad. Yes the scans will tell us, but surely he would have an idea, being through this before on a couple of occasions.
 

Graysonti

Well-Known Member
May 8, 2011
3,904
5,823
Not according to the whispers ‘allegedly’ coming out of HK’s mouth. He definitely is telling people already he is confident that not that bad. Yes the scans will tell us, but surely he would have an idea, being through this before on a couple of occasions.

Hopefully just heavy bruising
 

stevenurse

Palacios' neck fat
May 14, 2007
6,089
10,022
Should have enough but the Swansea game is as big as the Chelsea game. I'm assuming be won't be back for that but great news if it isn't as bad as it could have been
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
There’s quite a few comments on here and twitter we were better when he went off. It’s something I’ve thought about before but seems ludicrous to suggest and it’s almost impossible to prove. But Kane shots per goal ratio is actually very poor possibly highest in league at 5.6. Effectively he scores a goal a game. Therefore that’s 4.5 situations that are essentially wasted, where possibly another player may have kept the ball moving and created a better chance. As said it’s really impossible to prove one way or another. But it’s kind of interesting. I think it’s almost the Man City scenario. They really do like to walk the ball into the net. Would we score more from those 4.5 other situations with other players who can say. Seems ludicrous to say we could actually score more goals without Kane, but personally I don’t think it’s that ludicrous.
 
Top