What's new

Are we now a big club and one of the worlds richest

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
We aren’t far off. UEFA coefficient is 19th no idea how uptodate that is though expected higher. If still 19 next season we’d be in pot 3 for the CL if qualify which would be annoying. However most updated European ranking sites have us at 7th-12th. Once the stadium is built the infrastructure is definitely elite. But then we have to win a title domestically and at least get to 1/4 final CL. Still long way to go but growing every season.

We haven't won a league in over 50 years and haven't won the fa cup in over 20. We have been in the cl 3 times. We are not an elite club.
We can be in the future but not yet.
 

Lemon

End World Debt
Jul 17, 2014
2,436
4,664
We can't be considered elite until we start to win some silverware.

Unless, perhaps, you place financial before elite. We do seem to be morphing both on and off the pitch into an Elite Club.

According to 'the secret', perhaps all we now need is to collectively believe we are becoming an elite team. Maybe it's our history which inhibits this (we always lose to Chelsea, Spursy...)
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Unless, perhaps, you place financial before elite. We do seem to be morphing both on and off the pitch into an Elite Club.

According to 'the secret', perhaps all we now need is to collectively believe we are becoming an elite team. Maybe it's our history which inhibits this (we always lose to Chelsea, Spursy...)

If any other club were in our situation and their fans were saying that they're an 'elite' team we'd scoff at it and look at the trophy count, finance is irrelevant in that aspect especially when there are 5 other clubs who can pay significantly more than us to their players.
 

King of Otters

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2012
10,751
36,094
We're moving in the right direction, but this isn't an Arab takeover. Progress is incremental, and we should start by aiming to compete with likes of Liverpool and Arsenal financially before we start thinking about elite level £300k wages.
 

stevenurse

Palacios' neck fat
May 14, 2007
6,089
10,022
Disregarding the OP as extremely optimistic, I don't get the outrage regarding footballers wages when compared to other 'entertainers'.

It's hacky and a flawed argument. Do singers earning 20m+ per tour get criticised for their earnings? Do actors who get 15m+ for a film get that thrown at them if they are in a stinker?
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Disregarding the OP as extremely optimistic, I don't get the outrage regarding footballers wages when compared to other 'entertainers'.

It's hacky and a flawed argument. Do singers earning 20m+ per tour get criticised for their earnings? Do actors who get 15m+ for a film get that thrown at them if they are in a stinker?

No, for some reason people single out footballers for being 'thick' and therefore shouldn't be earning high wages, it's just working class snobbery at the end of the day
 

tommo84

Proud to be loud
Aug 15, 2005
6,189
11,227
Don't subscribe to the idea that there's 'no reason' why we can't play our players £250k a week. It will still take years of repaying the stadium debt, consistently selling out the stadium and growing our overseas fan base before we can match the wage bills of the 'elite' clubs. What we should be able to do is give competitive contracts to Kane and one or two others but even that isn't simple as once one or two players move up a wage bracket then the rest of the starting XI will want parity.

As for the outrage at what footballers earn, I don't have a problem with it in ethical terms but am in favour of some capping being imposed. Having a team cap, but not individual caps makes for very interesting moves in US sports as even the best teams have to juggle the demands of their best players with meeting the cap requirements.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,590
205,112
Disregarding the OP as extremely optimistic, I don't get the outrage regarding footballers wages when compared to other 'entertainers'.

It's hacky and a flawed argument. Do singers earning 20m+ per tour get criticised for their earnings? Do actors who get 15m+ for a film get that thrown at them if they are in a stinker?
TBF you don't get 50,000 people in a cinema chanting 'there's only one Al Pacino', the two aren't in any way comparable :D

My onion, of course.
 

al_pacino

woo
Feb 2, 2005
4,572
4,112
Disregarding the OP as extremely optimistic, I don't get the outrage regarding footballers wages when compared to other 'entertainers'.

It's hacky and a flawed argument. Do singers earning 20m+ per tour get criticised for their earnings? Do actors who get 15m+ for a film get that thrown at them if they are in a stinker?

Comparing with other entertainment mediums is a touch flawed too because if actors find themselves in too many stinkers they do find themselves earning less the music biz can be very fickle too. Not so many five year contracts with guaranteed earnings in those industries.

I think for years players were well underpaid bearing in mind what clubs were earning but in some cases it's gone a bit far the other way with bang average players(comparatively speaking) earning too much.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Don't subscribe to the idea that there's 'no reason' why we can't play our players £250k a week. It will still take years of repaying the stadium debt, consistently selling out the stadium and growing our overseas fan base before we can match the wage bills of the 'elite' clubs. What we should be able to do is give competitive contracts to Kane and one or two others but even that isn't simple as once one or two players move up a wage bracket then the rest of the starting XI will want parity.

As for the outrage at what footballers earn, I don't have a problem with it in ethical terms but am in favour of some capping being imposed. Having a team cap, but not individual caps makes for very interesting moves in US sports as even the best teams have to juggle the demands of their best players with meeting the cap requirements.

Put it in perspective byerns top earner (lewandowski) is on £160k a week.
 

leffe186

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2004
5,357
1,799
Put it in perspective byerns top earner (lewandowski) is on £160k a week.

Interesting. I know BM were fourth in the Deloitte money league with more commercial income than any other club in the world, and they usually have a wage bill more than twice ours. Last records show theirs was 265M Euro. Do they have a more bonus-driven scheme or do they simply pay all of their players a shit-ton of money?
 

Locotoro

Prince of Zamunda
Sep 2, 2004
9,392
14,050
250-300k per week is obscene and it is time for a wage cap worldwide for the sake of the sport.

Even capped at 200k is obscene and if you are not happy with that as a wage for playing a sport you need to have a long hard look at yourself as it means you are a greedy fecker.

That equates to 104 million over a 10 year career insane figures

I must be the only person thinking a wage cap is a bad idea. I suspect it will actually push up the salaries of the middle earners rather than limit the top earners and club would end up paying more of their revenue in salaries.

If you cap the salaries at say 150k everyone will push for that salary and then use some neat accounting trick like performance related bonus payments or sponsorship % revenue to boost it to higher levels. Clubs would end up paying more.

There is a problem but I don't think that is the solution
 

stevenurse

Palacios' neck fat
May 14, 2007
6,089
10,022
Elite is just a word. We are tottenham Hotspur, the world's greatest team.

Exactly. There's even a song about how we're by far the greatest team, the world has ever seen.

We wouldn't be allowed to sing it if it wasn't true...
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
6,743
17,310
No, for some reason people single out footballers for being 'thick' and therefore shouldn't be earning high wages, it's just working class snobbery at the end of the day

Johnny Depp's films don't make much on top of his wages compared to most other big actors, and the fucker plays the same character in every film these days.
 
Top