cider spurs
Well-Known Member
- Jul 5, 2016
- 9,400
- 23,732
Yes mate think you are right. Son and South Korea vs N. Ireland tomorrow p.m also.
The England Thread
- Thread starter THFCSPURS19
- Start date
Yes mate think you are right. Son and South Korea vs N. Ireland tomorrow p.m also.
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,873
- 41,454
The fuck is that line up man?
mark87
Well-Known Member
- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,180
- 114,894
Southgate on acid I'm guessing.
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,873
- 41,454
What an uninspiring midfield
LexingtonSpurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 27, 2013
- 13,456
- 39,042
I'd rather Dier and Dele have started this game - now they will surely start the next match.
mark87
Well-Known Member
- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,180
- 114,894
Games on tuesday, we play on Sunday so it's not so bad.
You'd have an easier time calculating quantum physics than trying to decipher that line up.
Southgate is not exactly inspiring any confidence in my England to win the WC bet with stuff like this
mark87
Well-Known Member
- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,180
- 114,894
Why on earth would you place such a bet? Have you not seen is play at international tournaments before?
gushayes11
Well-Known Member
- May 24, 2007
- 6,824
- 13,003
Nullifying Walker’s strength in bombing forward. Strange line up.
St José Dominguez
Well-Known Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 3,592
- 11,648
The only way England have any chance of going far into the tournament would be to build a solid team and rely on Kane. No idea why Southgate wouldn't use every friendly to build continuity and stability on pitch by selecting what he considers pretty much his first team. This game in particular is completely pointless now in terms of preparation.
If you're going to play a 3 why not play the 3 who are going to start the WC so they build some sort of understanding. I can understand rotating attacking players for the two games but to have no clue really who's going to be your combination of CBs this close to a World Cup is embarrassingly poor.
If you're going to play a 3 why not play the 3 who are going to start the WC so they build some sort of understanding. I can understand rotating attacking players for the two games but to have no clue really who's going to be your combination of CBs this close to a World Cup is embarrassingly poor.
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,873
- 41,454
Progressive tactics innit
WiganSpur
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 15,984
- 32,698
Agreed.
Choose 2 keepers out of the four, choose your back 4 and your midfield, and maybe rotate the forward players a little with Kane injured.
rabbikeane
Well-Known Member
- Mar 29, 2005
- 6,916
- 12,744
I take It's like this
Pickford
Walker . Stones . Gomez
Trippier . Chamberlain . Henderson . Rose
Lingard . Sterling
Rashford
Walker . Stones . Gomez
Trippier . Chamberlain . Henderson . Rose
Lingard . Sterling
Rashford
Ionman34
SC Supporter
- Jun 1, 2011
- 7,182
- 16,793
West Ham have no internationals...
LMFAO!!!
Just for you O’Zio...
International teams are weaker than the team you play for...
How weak do you need to be to have no internationals?
Yes I know Hart is in the fold, but I don’t think too many regard him as an international really.
Last edited:
Because on the unlikely chance it comes off, i make good money? A cheeky 20 was worth it
Sandros Shiny Head
Well-Known Member
- Aug 20, 2013
- 4,794
- 8,765
Having Walker doing the defensive work letting Trippier stay up and whip crosses in could make some sense if Kane was playing but obviously it's Rashford so it's completely pointless
mark87
Well-Known Member
- Nov 29, 2004
- 36,180
- 114,894
Or maybe?
Pickford
Walker Gomez Stones Trippier
Chamberlain Rose Henderson
Sterling Rashford Lingard.
Could it be this instead?
