What's new

New Stadium Details And Discussions

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
They are building 1, by using less than 20% of their net worth.

They can build two - if it were financially worthwhile.*

So, I think one of us is naive, but I don't think its me...

*When people like Kroenke and Levy/Lewis sit down and look at a project like a stadium - the first, and last, question they ask is: Is this financially worthwhile? And that means, they are crunching numbers and making a determination that the stadium will generate sufficient future revenue to justify the upfront investment. Investors at this level are not getting rich by spending a huge sum on an "expense" - they will only move forward if the project is EV+, and meets their risk tolerance.

My point is that he’s still financially stretching himself. If it was that easy for him he would have just put up the $3.8 bn himself instead of getting a loan for $2.2bn. As seen with WHL costs can double. Rams stadium was estimated at $4bn already $5bn.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,699
16,790
If we hadn't had this fire alarm issue, we would've been moving into the stadium at around 90%, but now with this additional delay every other trade has extra time to complete and snag everything, so it's no longer a rushed job. I'm sure some of the other sub-contractors have seen this as a blessing is disguise.

Can confirm this, not just the building itself but all other associated items and projects are feeling a bit less pressed right now.
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
Mail saying city game will be moved to Monday. Which tbh makes all the media fuss about it seem slightly silly.
 

Bobbins

SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
May 5, 2005
21,598
45,145
Just so glad we haven't ended up with either City or Liverpool as our first ever game at the new stadium.
 

ToDarrenIsToDo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2017
1,665
6,291
Just so glad we haven't ended up with either City or Liverpool as our first ever game at the new stadium.

I ain't that fussed about the romanticism of the first game at home. It would have been nice to have a more winnable game but for me the sooner we are in there the better regardless of who we play now.

Wembley is costing us £2m per game, a hell of a lot of money when we have a stadium so close to completion if it wasn't for a few poor electricians doing the work on it it seems
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
I ain't that fussed about the romanticism of the first game at home. It would have been nice to have a more winnable game but for me the sooner we are in there the better regardless of who we play now.

Wembley is costing us £2m per game, a hell of a lot of money when we have a stadium so close to completion if it wasn't for a few poor electricians doing the work on it it seems

Where did the £2m figure come from? That is a huge amount it would have meant we paid almost £50m last season?
 

ToDarrenIsToDo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2017
1,665
6,291
Where did the £2m figure come from? That is a huge amount it would have meant we paid almost £50m last season?

I read somewhere that the fee for Wembley last season was £20m for the whole season whereas because we were using it for a game here & there this time it's £2m per game. I'll try and dig out a link if I can find one but honestly not sure where I read that and if it's a legitimate source
 
Last edited:

adamsky

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2006
1,687
4,461
Crazy that Wembley costs £2m per game when you consider Wham pay that for season at the London Stadium. Although I guess the the saying ‘you get what you pay for’ certainly rings true.
 
Last edited:

ToDarrenIsToDo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2017
1,665
6,291
Crazy that Wembley costs £2m per game when you consider Wham pay that for season at the London Stadium. Although I guess the the saying ‘you get what you pay gor’ certainly rings true.

West Ham have genuinely hit the jackpot with that disgustingly unfair deal they got £1m-£2m per season when it instantly generates a further £30m in matchday revenue if all goes well and prices/ fan demand balance is reached is mental. They get a further £25m more than any other team based on their infrastructure gains over the next 100 years.

I don't like Arsenal but at least they weren't given corners to cut for such a massive part of the club so future success. The people in charge of that project and decision making when it came to the West Ham bid should be seriously looked into. They'll be able to throw money at it year on year until something sticks. I sincerely hope they go down
 
Last edited:

LexingtonSpurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2013
13,456
39,042
I read somewhere that the fee for Wembley last season was £20m for the whole season whereas because we were using it for a game here &a there this time it's £2m per game. I'll try and dog out a link if I can find one but honestly not sure where I read that and if it's a legitimate source
£2M per match seems like a losing proposition - but that may also be why we have opted not to use the stadium for domestic Cup matches.
 

mkkid

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2004
2,035
452
I ain't that fussed about the romanticism of the first game at home. It would have been nice to have a more winnable game but for me the sooner we are in there the better regardless of who we play now.

Wembley is costing us £2m per game, a hell of a lot of money when we have a stadium so close to completion if it wasn't for a few poor electricians doing the work on it it seems


Its 3 million a game.
 

hellava_tough

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2005
9,429
12,383
West Ham have genuinely hit the jackpot with that disgustingly unfair deal they got £1m-£2m per season when it instantly generates a further £30m in matchday revenue if all goes well and prices/ fan demand balance is reached is mental. They get a further £25m more than any other team based on their infrastructure gains over the next 100 years.

I don't like Arsenal but ATM least they weren't given corners to cut for such a massive part of the club so future success. The people in charge of that project and decision making when it came to the West Ham bid should be seriously looked into. They'll be able to throw money at it year on year until something sticks. I sincerely hope they go down

True, but Spam are also beholden to the changing political environment, since the stadium is owned by the 'public'

It's unlikely that they're going to get an easy ride for the next 100 years; if I were them, I'd be looking to buy the stadium lock stock and barrel, so I don't have to answer to public opinion every general election
 

SirHarryHotspur

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
5,147
7,666
Last edited:

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
Last season we got a good deal because we were dealing for the whole season.

Now we're dealing on single games and we're paying the price for it. The £2m and £3m figures have been doing the rounds.

I think this just goes to show how clearly we thought we'd be in.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,483
78,016
I dont car how little West Ham are paying, I hate that stadium. I'm so glad we're building this amazing one instead and staying in Tottenham.
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
There’s not a chance we are paying £2m a game. Levy would have moved it to Mk dons rather than pay that. £2m a game ?
 
Top