Sandros Shiny Head
Well-Known Member
- Aug 20, 2013
- 4,794
- 8,765
Everyone else on Earth would beWouldn't be surprised if Aulas offered a lesser fee to PSG also
Player Watch - Tanguy Ndombele
- Thread starter dtxspurs
- Start date
$hoguN
Well-Known Member
- Jul 25, 2005
- 26,659
- 34,795
Why would he do that? He is clearly talking about them to try to get a bidding war going. Defeats the entire purpose to cut the price for them.Wouldn't be surprised if Aulas offered a lesser fee to PSG also
Kids this is why you shouldn’t smoke the reefer...
jonnyrotten
SC Supporter
- Aug 16, 2006
- 2,114
- 3,721
We are 4/1 favourites to sign him with Sky Bet, 6/1 Bet Victor. Surprised city aren't shorter odds..
https://www.oddschecker.com/footbal...uy-ndombele/club-after-summer-transfer-window
https://www.oddschecker.com/footbal...uy-ndombele/club-after-summer-transfer-window
Ron Burgundy
SC Supporter
- Jun 19, 2008
- 7,736
- 23,410
Blimey - little though that means in the grand scheme of things, IMO
Just imagine: If we kicked the transfer window off with Sess and Ndombele, that would be absolutely incredible.
In a realistic scenario, those two, with a RB and another CM (Lo Celso, or alike), would be as good as we could possibly hope for.
Fingers crossed
jonnyrotten
SC Supporter
- Aug 16, 2006
- 2,114
- 3,721
If you change the specials at the top of that link you can see the odds for the likes of Sess and Lo Celso. Quite interesting that David Brooks is 2/1 fav to join us, Tripps 4/9 on to go to Napoli etc.
Last edited:
Sandro30
Well-Known Member
- Jul 7, 2011
- 2,855
- 12,322
It’s just weight of money, they don’t have any insight.
Hakkz
Svensk hetsporre
- Jul 6, 2012
- 8,196
- 17,270
Means absolute fuck all.
carpediem991
Well-Known Member
- May 31, 2011
- 8,839
- 20,316
But you never know if people with inside knowledge are trying to make money with a bet....
bigpalacios
Well-Known Member
- Jun 7, 2009
- 2,769
- 6,980
No I'm happy where I am.
hutchiniho
Top Cat
- Mar 19, 2006
- 4,679
- 5,935
I think we would go in for Brookes if Eriksen leaves.
Obviously not on Eriksen level at the moment but Brookes did look very talented in his first season in the Premiership.
Would quite like Brookes even if Eriksen stays.
Him, AWB and Ndombele would be a brilliant window
Obviously not on Eriksen level at the moment but Brookes did look very talented in his first season in the Premiership.
Would quite like Brookes even if Eriksen stays.
Him, AWB and Ndombele would be a brilliant window
Last edited:
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,949
- 45,209
Are you in the right thread? This is the Ndombele thread.
robertgoulet
SC Resident Crooner Extraordinaire
- Jul 23, 2013
- 3,610
- 12,552
This is one of those "every time I see someone bump this thread I pray it's a solid link stating we are close to signing him" threads.
MindOverMatter
Well-Known Member
- May 21, 2019
- 481
- 1,367
Your not the only one hoping for that ??
'O Zio
Well-Known Member
- Dec 27, 2014
- 7,405
- 13,785
As @Sandro30 says above, it doesn't mean anything other than that people have placed money on it. A paper makes up some nonsense transfer rumour that does the rounds on twitter, loads of people see that and stick a fiver on it, and so the bookies shorten the odds. The bookies are no more ITK than any of us and the odds they offer are not a true reflection of the probability, just a reflection of the way the money is going.
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,890
- 130,524
He better be. I’ve got my notepad out and I’m itiching to hand someone a Caution at the very least.
DanielCHillier
Well-Known Member
- Feb 26, 2014
- 2,036
- 4,029
Only just signed a new long term contract with Bournemouth though.
ostrov
Well-Known Member
- Jan 8, 2006
- 1,449
- 1,056
Do you mean pro-Ndombele thread?
Univarn
Lost. Probably Not Worth Finding.
- Jul 20, 2017
- 2,864
- 15,279
I'm willing to bite and not be judgmental, who would be your alternative target? You're quite clearly not keen on him so I am curious who you think we should be targeting instead.
Similar threads
