What's new

What Our Opponents' Fans Are Saying About Us 23/24

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,511
330,450
I'd much rather listen to ex managers than ex players. At least managers have a more holistic view of the game whereas ex players are usually much more biased and only see the game from their own limited perspective. Even Mourinho was tolerable as a pundit which is quite remarkable.
Jose is an excellent pundit as is Wenger. Didn't like them as managers, but as pundits explaining the game I could listen to both of them for hours.
 

Tafspur

Where self-belief is a giant, talent is a dwarf
Dec 1, 2011
768
1,223
Proof of the pudding etc..........

Are Villa going to appeal the Red?
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,058
54,730
Agbonlahor makes Benny from Top Cat look like a Nobel Prize winning physicist.
Captain America I Understood That Reference GIF - Captain America I  Understood That Reference Just Saying - Discover & Share GIFs
 

leffe186

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2004
5,358
1,820
Was reading a f365 piece which made the interesting point that spurs have more PL points than Chelsea or Man U over the last decade, and Chelsea in 6th have 175 points more than West Ham in 7th over that period. So next time a fan of West Ham, Newcastle, Everton or Villa say they are as big as us and there isn’t a big 6, tell them to shove that where the sun doesn’t shine.

Those three clubs in particular are making a point of considering us one of the “Big Six” right now because of FFP (sorry FSR or whatever it is now). For years they pretended we weren’t, now they are happy to say we are because we’re not letting them spend anything they want.

Agbonlahor is quite possibly the dumbest person on tv and radio. Contradicts himself on a daily basis. I specifically remember him saying that Bissouma definitely deserved his red card against Forest despite not really making contact, yet doesn’t believe McGinn was red despite almost putting Udogie into the stands.

The man is an imbecile.

My wife spent a fair time backstage at Villa in the 2000s. She herself is searingly intelligent, but she considers Agbonlahor to be one of the dumbest human beings she has ever met.

I'd much rather listen to ex managers than ex players. At least managers have a more holistic view of the game whereas ex players are usually much more biased and only see the game from their own limited perspective. Even Mourinho was tolerable as a pundit which is quite remarkable.

Yeah me too. They tend to have a quicker and more incisive view on what’s happening on the pitch.

I actually think the post-match analysis on MOTD and others has been excellent over the last year or two. It’s just that the immediate analysis from colour commentators or pundits is often lacking in insight and frankly bad. Then you factor in inherent biases that are often incredibly transparent, and casting decisions that are horribly one-eyed like the choice of pundits for the Arsenal-Spurs WSL game.
 

Nayim60yards

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
1,440
6,110
I actually think the post-match analysis on MOTD and others has been excellent over the last year or two. It’s just that the immediate analysis from colour commentators or pundits is often lacking in insight and frankly bad. Then you factor in inherent biases that are often incredibly transparent, and casting decisions that are horribly one-eyed like the choice of pundits for the Arsenal-Spurs WSL game.
This reads dubiously. I hope it doesn't mean what it looks like it means.
 

RuskyM

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2011
7,071
23,339
I'd much rather listen to ex managers than ex players. At least managers have a more holistic view of the game whereas ex players are usually much more biased and only see the game from their own limited perspective. Even Mourinho was tolerable as a pundit which is quite remarkable.
There's that thing of the best managers often being relatively limited players, because they know their limitations and how to make up for them with their teams. Most footballers don't think too heavily about football: they're just good at it and usually always have been. It's why so many footballing autobiographies are really boring - how can you give the inside story of what makes you unique if it's just how your life has been? For every player who can offer genuine insight (which is why Carragher and Neville are still the best), there's a truckload who either coast on charm or are just a name we recognise. It's strange though: Gary O'Neil was perfectly fine as a player, but he both spoke tremendously and can clearly connect with people: Paul Scholes is one of the most technically adept and successful players England has ever produced and he's a horrendous pundit.
 

Nayim60yards

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
1,440
6,110
Thank you for the info guys. I have learned a new term. I thought the term must be something I was unaware of and that is why I didn't go after the poster but sought clarification.
 

leffe186

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2004
5,358
1,820
This reads dubiously. I hope it doesn't mean what it looks like it means.

It’s what the guys above said. I’ve been living in the US for 15 years 😀. You have the commentator (Barry Davies, John Motson, whoever) constantly telling you what’s happening and then a “colour commentator” (typically a retired pro - Alan Smith, Chris Sutton) who’s supposed to chip in from time to time with insight or enthusiasm.

It’s great when it’s somebody with true insight (Hoddle is decent at this) or infectious and universal enthusiasm (Ian Wright it great at this). It’s terrible when it’s somebody just mouthing platitudes or pre-prepared sound bites, or somebody whose bias is transparent (Neville).
 
Top