I say we should quit the game and reload the save file for the start of the season.
It might be worth editing said save file first, to make Pochettino happier, and sneakily extend Eriksen's contract.
Since he was free to negotiate a pre-contract we can assume that Real Madrid & Barca didn't show enough interest in him, so he looked at other options rather than gamble on leaving it until the summer.
I think we got lucky in that Inter are currently challenging Juve for the title, have a...
I like the idea of a general spurs transfer discussion thread during the window, which is less moderated than the ITK thread.
Sometimes I enjoy some of the discussions and banter in the ITK thread so would like more relaxed moderation, but other times I am short on time / focus and just want to...
As much as £30m seems a ridiculous figure for him, making him our record signing etc - we still have to look at things relatively.
If considering him the worst signing in terms of a waste of money, there are a couple of others that come to mind:
Back in 2000, Rebrov cost £11m*, our turnover**...
We also don't know which of Paul Mitchell's recommendations were acted on, and which of our signings were identified by others on the transfer committee.
I was wondering about that myself - my theory is that he did a scan in the UK and it said it was a minor issue. Lamela still felt pain and perhaps thought they were missing something, so went for a second opinion in Rome with his previous fitness coach. The second scan shows the same issue.
He was a great loan signing for us, in 2011/12.
As a permanent signing he was pretty bad. In my view, I wouldn't say the worst as he did have one spell under Sherwood that was pretty good and there wasn't a huge transfer fee involved, just the large wages, but certainly in the worst 5.
That...
I remembered this incident, but realised my memory wasn't clear about what Southgate said about it at the time:
Googling it brought up some tabloid interpretations of words taken out of context (like the above mail article).
Then I found it on the independent which gave extended quotes...
It does seem odd, almost as if selling him back in 2014 for £50m or so was some kind of FFP money laundering excercise, and now they are obligated to buy him back.
I'm no demolition expert, but I assume they have to be very careful dismantling the roof as it's a very light (& fragile) structure. If they just ripped the northern part of the East Stand roof off, then it might compromise or break the rest of the roof. And they have to remove the roof before...
Just wanted to clarify the point in bold; Uber is not a subsidary of Google (or Alphabet Inc). Google Ventures, an investment arm of Google, invested $250 million back in 2013. It is not publically revealed how much that converts to in terms of ownership percentage but from what I can see is...
I think Vertonghen should probably go in bad week, up to yesterday was fine of course - but an unfortunate own goal and then being elbowed and injuring your knee in the process can't be much fun.
Fingers crossed the injury is not serious.
According to the VDV leaked contract, the final installment of €2.625m (£2.240m at time) for VDV was due on the day of the Bale contract, so I'd assume from the clause in the Bale contract that we were able to waive that payment. So that would make the total sale of Bale worth ~ £87.4m.
The article has some truth in it and overall I agree with the sentiment - but the above paragraph leaves out a very notable success story - Bale. It took him a while to fully establish himself and break the non-winning 'curse' but that was after a few injury setbacks and managerial changes. Also...
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.