They must be laughing their tits off. They 100% would have got rid. He was hated by their fans and the League Cup final debacle should have been seen as the end.
They've now spent the last few weeks pretending he wouldn't have got the sack so they can get money for him going, rather than paying...
Is it me, or are Sky Sports trying reaaaaaaaaallly hard to keep ManUre relevant?
"the rise of Daniel James" everywhere I fucking look.
What rise? It's not like he's hit any kind of stratosphere. He's played a season in the Championship for a side that didn't look like coming up.
He could be...
It's not that I'm bent out of shape as such. It's the fact the headline
Makes it sound very much like he expects Levy to go out and buy loads of players.
When you read the article, it says no such thing. It actually goes on to say he knows the constraints we work with and that a lot hinges...
Just trying to shut down the avalanche of people who won't actually read the article (which has more words than pictures, unlike their usual redtop garbage) but will no doubt go off on one about how this is the beginning of a new dawn for Spurs etc.
Just pointing out the obvious. People really seem to go window to window forgetting about the last one.
They point to us getting more money than ever before, but that's the case every single year. TV rights go up. Sponsorship deals get bigger. We go from no Europe, to Uefa Cup, to Champions...
Just from watching video's on youtube of his time in Holland, I think he needs a lot of coaching on the football side of things.
He's very quick and very skillful, but all I'm seeing is poor and wayward shots from positions that don't warrant shooting.
There's an element of Andros Townsend...
It's like people have conveniently forgotten the last 20 years of transfers.
We may buy a couple of expensive players. But be sure that if we do, it will be offset by departures.
We are not going to go from 30m net spend in 5 years to hundreds of millions in one window.
I dont care if we got...
I think it varies year by year. The first year of Nike was very late in the summer because the UA deal had to expire first. Things like that.
May also be a sleeve sponsor to deal with now?
Now how you gonna go from witnessing 2 windows without a single signing at all, to expectations of ludicrous spending?
Get real. You and everyone. We aren't suddenly going out and spending over £100m net.
All drinks have sugar free versions that taste also the same.
It's hardly ever addiction and mainly down to utter stubbornness whereby people refuse to drink the sugar free versions.
They get what they deserve and one day soon, the sugar versions will be banned anyway.
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.