- Jun 8, 2003
- 28,018
- 65,116
- Admin
- #21
£26 million and his wages. That's a whole lot more realistic. Especially as the wages will probably come down to a more realistic value as well.
£50 million Tevez bid Stuns Spurs
- Thread starter fridgemagnet
- Start date
£26 million and his wages. That's a whole lot more realistic. Especially as the wages will probably come down to a more realistic value as well.
it's not 50m it's 26 million plus wages. how come we don't always refer to xfer price plus wages? The press wanted a big number. dont fall into that
no way he gets paid 160 anyway. I'm sure gerrard and torres would be fine with that. no they would not
lets examine the 'facts'
26m says who? it will be less
160k a week says who? it will be less.
and he likely wont go from MU to pool anyway for the same reasons we sholdnt have sold berbs.
the correct headline should be 'spurs yawn as numebrs tossed around by someone who will almost certainly be wrong hit silly press on a slow news day"
ffs
no way he gets paid 160 anyway. I'm sure gerrard and torres would be fine with that. no they would not
lets examine the 'facts'
26m says who? it will be less
160k a week says who? it will be less.
and he likely wont go from MU to pool anyway for the same reasons we sholdnt have sold berbs.
the correct headline should be 'spurs yawn as numebrs tossed around by someone who will almost certainly be wrong hit silly press on a slow news day"
ffs
Are you less than 12 years old?
Mr Gamgee
Well-Known Member
- Jul 25, 2005
- 4,339
- 281
lol. The silly season is well and truly apon us.
Do you really think that clubs enter negociations by saying they are "willing" to pay £50m but as a opening bid we will offer 26m.
Hmmm.... welll if you are willing to pay £50m, then why would we accept a bid £26m
Secondly, £160k a week. yeah right
Do you really think that clubs enter negociations by saying they are "willing" to pay £50m but as a opening bid we will offer 26m.
Hmmm.... welll if you are willing to pay £50m, then why would we accept a bid £26m
Secondly, £160k a week. yeah right
Mr Gamgee
Well-Known Member
- Jul 25, 2005
- 4,339
- 281
£26m + £8.3 doesnt come to £50m. £50m is just a number they plucked out the air
The Original Yiddster
Banned
- Aug 21, 2007
- 2,403
- 0
cant believe we ever thought £18m would be enough to buy him.........
some people obviously have trouble reading the fee was £26m with wages taking it to £50m.
if you believe any of it..... which I dont.
It is a well known fact that LFC have to change bankers this summer with RBS saying they wont continue to support the loans of Hicks and Gillette ...... so whilst it is possible they could borrow signficantly more funds as part of a re negotiations I think their first priority will be to focus on getting re financing for the existing debt before adding to it
some people obviously have trouble reading the fee was £26m with wages taking it to £50m.
if you believe any of it..... which I dont.
It is a well known fact that LFC have to change bankers this summer with RBS saying they wont continue to support the loans of Hicks and Gillette ...... so whilst it is possible they could borrow signficantly more funds as part of a re negotiations I think their first priority will be to focus on getting re financing for the existing debt before adding to it
whl_yid1982
HUGE Member
- Jun 14, 2005
- 2,314
- 85
He's not worth £26m or £160,000 a week ridiculously over priced. That crook Johabichin (sp) is a joke!
guy
SC Supporter
- May 31, 2007
- 4,508
- 6,182
26 mill fee + 8.3 per year wages for 3 years
- Jun 8, 2003
- 28,018
- 65,116
- Admin
- #36
Plucked out of the air via the crazy method of adding up ;-)
£26m + 3*£8.3m = £26m transfer + £24m wages over 3 years = £50m
danielneeds
Kick-Ass
- May 5, 2004
- 24,181
- 48,812
Maybe, but he would be pretty well suited to Kuyt's position. He is similar to him, just with a more ball skills and a bit more pace.
