Please Register to access the whole of the site and to post on the forums.
Discussion in 'Spurs Chat' started by OmarsComing, Sep 20, 2012.
Not as impressed with him as I have been on other occasions.
LOL who gives a fuck about neg ratings. I came on here to read people's ratings as I couldn't watch the game in Aus and I have to trawl through this shit!
I will repeat myself again...
He added the "dumb" to my post as a response to me disagreeing with his match ratings in this thread, not the other way round. So by definition for me to have a vendetta - he would have had to do something to me first, which he did not. I disagreed with his ratings on this thread first.
To add the “dumb” to my (5 day old, and probably not been read for 4 days)post so soon after I disagreed with him on his match ratings post in this thread smacks of someone who has looked for any post of mine to “settle a score”.
The fact that he added it to my Reading match ratings has no relation to this apart from the fact it was the easiest of my posts to find as it was my last one. Had I made a more recent post he would have added the "dumb" to that instead (in fact he added a "dumb" to my response to his ratings despite 7 others agreeing with my reasoning.).
I always said I disagreed with his ratings, and gave my reasons for that on the first page of the thread. To suggest otherwise would be untrue.
Also to suggest there is any kind of an agenda against Omar on my part would be untrue also. This is the first time I have given him any rep – good or bad.
Well, that's one argument...but whenever anyone says that, or so it seems to me (maybe this is not true in your case), they are usually imagining that the only complaint is by fragile folk who will crumble into a nothingness of negative self-esteem is someone negs a post. That's not really the case. In the first instance, if you get into it with someone with a big red bar (phwoooooaaaaaarrrrrr) that drawfes their green bar, then you can know straight away that you are dealing with a bit of a loon and there isn't much point trying to talk sense to them. After that, it is also true that there are elements of fairness, consistency and cowardice to be dealt with, not to mention the ugly spectre of cyber-bullying.
By-and-large, I think we should rate positively for what we do agree with rather than negatively what we don't disagree with - but I'ma bit of a mentalist like that
Impressive Pos to neg ratio you got there SP. Agree with your last point.
And I will repeat myself AGAIN - you said you had been negged by nine members on one post, and that Omar was one of those posters and so you negged his post in this thread, even though there was nothing outlandish in it, so it was you who introduced the idea that you haad been negged first,and not some inability of mine to comprehend well composed texts - comprendre?
If you say that, and claim their was nothing outlandish in that post, then I would look at it and say whether there was or not. If there was, then you would have deserved NINE posters negging you, and should get over it, rather than waiting until you find something you disagree with of his that isn't outlandish and then <DISAGREE> because that suggests that you are being petty and not accepting that you have made an outlandish or offensive post. I really can't say, one way or another, whether this original post you referred to (and now won't link to) was outlandish or offensive, but I can say that it is unusual for nine posters to rate something a <DUMB> or <DISAGREE> unless it really is outlandish or offensive. So what was it? You assert that it wasn't, and therefore you are justified in negging Omar, in which case you may feel like you were redressing the balance (which is, ironically, what you are accusing Omar of). But if it was outlandish or offensive, then it is you that is being petty/vindictive/vengeful for marking a perfectly good post (whether you agree with its content totally or not as a <DISAGREE>. So could you please direct me to this post where you got nine negs where you still believe you were neither outlandish or offensive? And would you confrim that this is why you felt it was justifiable to neg Omar's post even though to the outside observer, like myself, there was nothing wrong with it. If I think you were treated unfairly and ganged-up-on a bit I will say so. But, I repeat, I can't see anything outlandish in Omar's post and I am not familiar with posts getting nine negs for no reason, either.
I never said you hadn't made a post in this thread where Omar could have mutually disagreed, I elucidated that it can be one of many problems, and is so discussed in the thread on ratings (where, I note, you still will not take this despite my repeated broad hints).
That's 'cos I'm a who hunts down and destroys anyone who disagrees with me
I thought we played well against a team who had previously won all their 5 games this season, i really feel that the side is getting better with every game and the future is looking good.
My MOM was Dembele and i thought Jan and Naughton were not far behind, my only real concern is Bale i have seen all the games this season and he is a shadow of the player he can be.
Lloris 6 - only because he had nothing to do
Walker 7 - going forward did well but concentration and passing still not quite there yet this season
Caulker 7 - well drilled, nothing flash good prospect
Verts 8 - looking more and more assured with every game
Naughton 6 - not as bad as at Reading but still shaky, worried about when he actually gets a winger against him
Lennon 6 - typical game, great pace but lacking vision and a final ball
Sandro 7 - immense first half tired in the second if I was to offer a criticism it would be that needs to be better with the ball at his feet in terms of creativity
Dembele 8 - my motm has strength, mobility passing etc would love to see him start further forward and be more of a goal threat
Bale 6 - just not happening for him at the moment but worked hard
Dempsey 6 - hard working performance but lacks the creativity needed in the role behind the striker but a good utility acquisition
Defoe 6 - cant fault his effort but contributed very little else
bUT Sorry have to disagree as they (Daily Mail) are correct......... He did acquit himself well by running positively unto the pitch, despite that only about 2 secs of the match remained!!
Sloth, why do you <disagree> with the above post?
I will admit that I was one who thought that 7th 8th etc, but after tonights encouraging performance I am quite happy to be proved wrong. As you said, the signs are there of a squad being well coached and drilled.
respur i never added a dumb rating to any of your older posts, just the post in this thread.
keep on trolling
Funny that it was on there last night and now vanished!
Tell me wizard Omar how did you make it vanish? Voodoo? Spells? The accidental press of your left bollock on delete while tossing off to the latest pics of a princess with her baby feeders out?
Keep up the good work
You have far too much time on your hands
No...the problem is I don't have enough time on my hands, but I still compose this bollox
BEROL VERTS 8
Lewis Hamilton - PLEASE PASS THE BALL!
Mason - kept shirt clean
I have finally got around to posting. I had been looking forward to this match for a while now. I knew it was always going to be an entertaining game against a good Lazio side, I was also looking forward to the atmosphere, the Lazio fans and the spurs fans what more do you want? I really thought we were going to be up for this. How wrong was I, as usual our fans did not really seem that bothered about the UEFA CUP, loads of empty seats, hardly ever got singing and the Lazio fans were loud all game,I think we had one loud bit when we sang "oooo when the spurs" and it was fucking good to hear why could be not keep it up all game, that would be amazing! fair play to tthe Lazio fans, shame about the racists noises but to be honest i never heard them. I wish English fans were more like supporters in Europe. Anyway to the game:
I thought we played well against a good organised, hardworking, dirty Lazio side, who come for the draw. They are a good side who are good on the ball and can play it around but I thought we dominated most of the match. I came away from the game feeling really frustrated, how the fuck did we not win that? They had one real shot which hit the crossbar and couple of chances Klose should of scored but apart from that they never really had a shot at goal.
I still think we lacked some creativity, our movement was quite good but we just seemed to lack something, the final ball, the final shot etc.I dont think Dempesy helped as his movement was generally quite poor, Lennon gets into some really good positions but his final ball is not good enough he needs to be much more clinical, he done well to beat his man a few times but either did not shoot when he had the chance or he just run out of ideas or gave the ball away. Shame ADE was injured for this game we needed someone who could hold the ball up front
I came away from the game feeling a bit shitty after a really good performance watching it back on TV. I thought we keeped the ball well, we worked hard of the ball and should of won the game Overall a good performance against a good side, who can keep the ball well themselves and move the ball around. How the hell they did not have a player sent of is beyond me. Dirty fucking Italians.
Lorris-7.5- Finally we have got a class keeper, you can just tell he is real good.The way he commands his area, the way he keeps the ball going, quick off his line, gives the ball quick, looks very good, said it all along. I am excited!
Walker-6.5 done ok few times got caught defensively.
Vertoghen-7.5 good game, solid, defends well, is good at attacking aswell, brings the ball out well, got skill, good on the ball, very good player just the kind of player I like.
Naughton-6.5 kept getting him mixed up from where I was sitting, think he gave it away in some silly positions it was either him or caulker
Caulker-6.5 done well, few times thought he got caught and gave it away but done well should of scored
Lennon-6.5 worked hard, got in some good positions, some good runs and skill but just not good enough when its come to his final ball, a few times he could of shot but gave it away. Needs to be much more creative. Frustrating grrrrrrrrr.
Sandro-7.5 good game, works so hard, good on the ball too, good game
Dembele-7.5 again good game, very good on the ball, few iffy passes but generally very good. So strong and makes some grat runs.
Bale-6.5 done ok, worked hard, made a few good runs, again lacked something, set pieces were poor also (how many free kicks did we have)
Dempsey-6 thought his movement was quite poor, gave it away alot
Defoe-6.5 tried hard, but was hard for him, few nice touches and passes always gonna be hard for him.
Sorry for the massive delay here but Defoe not doing anything good? He held the ball up very well and showed great vision and skill to play in Lennon perfectly twice.. if it had been Modric then everyone would have been creaming their pants!
anyone else see that Lloris was voted MOTM on the official team facebook page? i had a chuckle when i saw it.
Separate names with a comma.