- Jan 16, 2006
- 31,097
- 19,276
Soldado, Lamela, Paulinho, Capoue and Chiriches.
How did that do for our 'immediate' challenging?
Compared too Bentaleb, Mason and kane.
With more very promising tallent coming though also!
Soldado, Lamela, Paulinho, Capoue and Chiriches.
How did that do for our 'immediate' challenging?
So are you saying that if Levy and co promised you exciting flair players and entertaining football you'd be prepared to 'invest' more?
Of course not.
You are completely misunderstanding how our ownership works, I suspect deliberately, just to have yet another bash at ENIC.
If your preference is for some billionaire to come in and just spend shed loads of money for the pure love of it then I understand that. I doubt there are many people who wouldn't find that more exciting (albeit much much more risky).
But that's not what you are saying in this thread. You are somehow suggesting that because you pay to go and see Spurs, the owners should put in more money. And that those who pay a bigger percentage of their income should somehow get more from that 'investment'. It's complete codswallop and I suspect you know that.
10% of someone's yearly income makes them a little more than a 'fan' in my book.
I spend 10% of my yearly income on fuel, yet the chief exec of bp isn't returning my calls! I feel your pain brother.
Not to mention the 30% to 40% many spend on rent. Maybe their landlords should respect their investment and donate a similar amount of their own income to provide a swimming pool, sauna, jacuzzi and all those other extras it would be so nice to have along with the two bedrooms and whatnot?
If we're talking strictly business then £2000 is probably a rip off to watch fairly mundane football.
In business terms, the customers are paying a high price for an average quality product.
Don't know why he doesn't pump money into the stadium development as it's not money lost if he were to sell down the line. I can understand he doesn't want to use any of it on transfers knowing our shitty transfer business over the last 2-3 seasons.
If we're talking strictly business then £2000 is probably a rip off to watch fairly mundane football.
In business terms, the customers are paying a high price for an average quality product.
He has already put in £50m. How much cash do you think he has got?
£4.7 billion. £1 billion in artworks alone.
Agree. I started actively supporting in the 90s and grew up watching teams with the likes of Thatcher, Perry, Korsten, Acimovic and Vega.That really isn't how investment works. If he is here as an investor he isn't not going to just give the club £50m.
He could loan the club the money with a payment plan for it to be returned but I don't think that is really a good idea.
We are competing with the top 6, we're not doing that badly. In fact consistently better than we've been in my entire life.
He has not got £4.7bn cash but as assets including us. Yes he has an Art collection of $1bn. That is his passion and also gains in value far quicker than we do.
He has not got £4.7bn cash but as assets including us. Yes he has an Art collection of $1bn. That is his passion and also gains in value far quicker than we do.