Please Register to access the whole of the site and to post on the forums.
Discussion in 'Loanwatch' started by buttons, Jan 15, 2013.
No clubs have a right to belong in the EPL
Ok, look at it from another angle. I like a bit of NFL - big stadiums, nearly always full. Just a great spectacle. I don't think I'd be inclined to watch if I tuned in one Sunday to see a match with, say, the New York Giants @ Obscure American Town With A Population of 1000, the game being played at a 10,000 capacity single wooden stand stadium.
One team like Bournemouth or Brentford makes a good story but two, three of four, starts to devalue the league from a commercial point of view.
An obscure American Town such as Green Bay? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Bay,_Wisconsin
Exactly how I was going to respond.
You'll note they have no other professional sports, and it's gridiron which got them that massive draw of economy to their town in the first place.
I get the argument of wishing to see the larger fanbases towards the top, but I love seeing teams earn it on merit. For instance, in the Bundesliga, I'm not fond of Leverkusen or Wolfsburg for being driven by massive international companies (pun intended re:Wolfsburg). However, I'm not as anti-Hoffenheim as many fans of German football are, as it's a hometown lad who busted his nuts to build a successful company and he injected it into his local team, and they cleverly and intelligently built from the ground up. Their town has 3,000 people in it, but due to the success of their football team, they drew in more fans and now have a decent sized stadium which does relatively well in selling tickets.
So I love small-side success stories and the long term impacts they can hold. For the old top flight teams now struggling in the pyramid, they have less of an excuse, and should demand more from their leaderships; but that shouldn't be at the expense of resenting smaller clubs which do manage to figure things out.
Plus the fact some of these so-called big teams were not doing much until sugar daddies came along, Chelscum and Shitty being prime examples.
And as a rule sugar dad will get tired one day and looks for a new bird. Then they're back to square one.
Fair enough if that's your view, but personally I'd rather see a team make the Premier League by virtue of the quality of their football and infrastructure, rather than the size of their stadium or the pre-eminence of their town.
The entire football pyramid is based on the selection of teams vying to get to the top.
Getting there means they blooming well deserved it.
Staying there is part of the evolution process.
From a football point of view I agree, but from the cold hearted "English football as a product" - which brings in massive revenues from overseas - too many "little clubs" isn't good for the "brand". And this could affect future TV deals.
The big clubs who secure the vast majority of overseas interest (the Manchester clubs, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and us) are all unlikely to be relegated. Some territories will watch games and strike up allegiances due to their own players playing in the Premier League, as we saw with the likes of Mido and Berbatov bringing new interest in Spurs from Egypt and Bulgaria which fairly swiftly disappeared once we'd sold them. But that isn't dependent on the size of the club.
How much do you think the presence of Stoke, Hull, West Brom and Leicester increases the amount overseas TV rights are sold for?
New blood always seems good ., it gives the big boys a chance to rack up some cricket scores and the msm can cream themselves into believing they have a great brand.
I get what you're saying and frankly I don't think it poor logic (sure, anyone wants to see large, rocking stadiums every match), but as an "international fan" myself and friends/acquaintances/contacts with others, you'll note more often than not we pick sides towards the top of the table if not the very top. We don't tend to be interested in the smaller ones which cycle through the bottom of the league, and if anything, we like to see the teams we pick crush these recyclers.
The reality is that the EPL will be a top brand as long as English is the most spoken language in the world, and will likely only rise. The new TV deals in the US and all over the world for the Prem aren't necessarily because it's "the best league," it's because the consumers speak English and they want English-speaking players and English-speaking commentators and English ads all on the stadiums. La Liga will find it difficult to surpass the Prem because while they have massive followings all over the world, there just isn't much money in those places (of course, Barca just beat their last two weakling opponents 6-0 and 8-0, so they have no advantage there either). German just isn't a widely spoken language, and so their only hope of competing is to perform well in international tournaments and attract with their atmospheres.
The point is, the Prem isn't going anywhere, and especially not for the stadiums. In fact, I would even guess new and young international fans enjoy seeing teams they've never seen or heard of cycling through. If the same few teams dropped and rose between the Prem and Championship every year, it'd get pretty boring.
so, Alex Pritchard, then
Well, unlike City who had sugar daddy arrested for corruption (or whatever) and they just sold it all to sugar daddy mk2
Be interesting to see him on Big TV nights such as two legged play off semi.
Obviously the team around him is also important but he's been the man this season and hope he shows that in 2 (or hopefully 3) massive games.
First leg is at Griffin Park on Friday evening. As with all the play-off games, it'll be live on Sky Sports.
spoke to some Brentford fans n the pub last night (i live in Ealing).. they said Pritchard is a class above everyone in the championship, and we'd be stupid to let him go.. he got standing ovations yesterday..
yes i have been persuaded to go to the game on friday..
It's interesting to see how clubs have developed over the years. We see the premier league dominated by Lancashire and London clubs but few of them are as reliant on their locales as they once were. By that I mean that once upon a time say 80% of the crowd were from a few miles radius, and people simply didn't follow clubs from further afield. I find the post WW2 years interesting. Spurs, in the old div 2 topped the attendance charts for the whole country - gates against teams such as Chesterfield were among their lowest of the season but still neared 40k. I'd imagine that nearly 100% of the crowd were from North London or nearabouts. Meanwhile crowds at the provincial clubs were also high and just as dependant on their locales.
That contrasts with today whereby the large teams are almost brands (horribe term) in a certain sense in that people follow them because of some sort of perceived identity rather than where they're from or are based. It's only the smaller teams such as Leicester who still reflect the old ways. I reckon that's becoming more the case with every season that passes, especially as European football - the CL in particular - becomes more prominent. Oh well, that's today's meloncholy musing done with!
Sports has evolved into a business that runs 24/7.
You also have to accept that since the 40/50s people who's origins were north London, have move away to the countryside and thusly their support towards Tottenham has descended to their children; Of whom are not from the London Borough.
Also years ago, people could only afford to watch their local team and only had knowledge on those in a close proximity. Now with a click of a button, a tap of a mouse you can watch any team in the world.
Now we ask, is technology a liberator, or an enslaver?
Separate names with a comma.