Bielsa 3331 formation

Discussion in 'Spurs Chat' started by coys200, Sep 10, 2017.

  1. spids

    spids Active Member

    Messages:
    474
    Ratings Received:
    +1,197 / 50 / -23
    I slightly disagree with this. When Poch first came we played 4-2-3-1 religiously. Then, 2nd season when Dier played in CM he would drop back in between the CBs to allow the FBs to push on, enabling us to switch between 4-2-3-1 and 3-4-2-1 "in-game". But after Wanyama came, and Poch realised he could not play him and Dier together in CM, we mainly played 3-4-2-1, with Wanyama in DCM alongside Dembele and Dier at RCB. The only difference yesterday was that Dier played DCM (in Wanyama's absence) and Sanchez played in the back 3 instead of Dier (with toby shifting across to RCB). The formation was ultimately the same as last year, but I do agree the the midfield shape was a bit different. This was because of personnel rather than formation IMO. With Sissoko in CM, it resulted in him and Eriksen playing on the sides of a midfield diamond with Dier at the base of it. When Wanyama and Dembele play they both anchor and let Eriksen and Alli play where they like.

    Usual:
    GK
    RCB CB LCB
    RWB DCM DCM LWB
    AM AM
    CF
    Yesterday:
    GK
    RCB CB LCB
    RWB DCM LWB
    RCM LCM
    AM
    CF
     
    • Agree Agree x 15
    • Like Like x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. teok

    teok Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,657
    Ratings Received:
    +7,276 / 93 / -20
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 36
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. BringBack_leGin

    BringBack_leGin I BELIEVE

    Messages:
    17,569
    Ratings Received:
    +9,683 / 268 / -110
    Posted this in another thread but think it's pertinent here:

    The set up in this game very much reminded me of the Ajaz mid nineties Champions League winners. Yes, Trippier and Davies are in theory full backs, but their position was so high up on the pitch that really they were widemen in the old fashioned sense, while Vertonghen and Alderweireld spent as much time in traditional full back positions as they did in the middle, especially on the ball.

    Van der Sar
    Reiziger Blind F.De Boer
    Rijkaard
    Finidi Seedorf Davids Overmars
    Litmanen
    R.De Boer

    Kane
    Dele
    Davies Sissoko Eriksen Trippier
    Dier
    Vertonghen Sanchez Alderweireld
    Lloris​
    When it's Rose and Aurier instead of Davies in Trippier it will be even more reminiscent.

    It just becomes spooky when you then look at our lineup and see 4 players who broke through at Ajax.
     
    • Like Like x 10
  4. GetSpurredOn

    GetSpurredOn Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,495
    Ratings Received:
    +4,629 / 93 / -29
    There's definitely some fluidity in our setups now, predominantly based around the flexibility of the players to switch within the game without the need to change the personnel from the bench.
    Watched the highlights today, and initially Eriksen definitely looked to be sitting that bit deeper into a CM role, so very much

    Lloris
    Alderweireld, Sanchez, Vertonghen
    Trippier, Dier, Davies
    Sissoko, Eriksen
    Alli
    Kane
    As the game wore on and Everton were driven back, Eriksen moved to play higher up in and around Kane and Alli, so became more

    Lloris
    Alderweireld, Sanchez, Vertonghen
    Trippier, Sissoko, Dier, Davies
    Eriksen, Alli
    Kane
    The movement was fantastic at times.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    37,002
    Ratings Received:
    +45,392 / 2,086 / -621
    I think you are definitely more right than wrong, it pretty much was a 3331. We can argue all day about what it was at various phases of play, 3511, 31411 etc etc, in the match thread I just referred to it as a CM3 format, but on reflection I'm pretty sure this was some generic version of a 3331.

    Agree with much of that but not all. I think @coys200 is pretty much right, it was closest to a 3331. I know heat maps don't tell the whole truth, and this isn't conclusive proof but yesterday's kind of backs up the theory:

    Screen Shot 2017-09-10 at 16.45.59.png


    I get very much what you were saying, without the ball it definitely became a 3511, with Sissoko and Eriksen dropping back but as a default with the ball I'd say it was a 3331.






    But that's what @coys200 is saying. The Dier dropping back thing only happened when we played 2CB systems, with Dier in CM. The difference this season is big, as we have switched from a cm2 system to a cm3 system, which tactically is massively different. And we've now done it in a 2CB system (Chelsea) and 3CB system (Everton).

    The massive tactical difference is, in a 2CM system, in a proactive team (like we are) both CM's have to pivot and do all things in varying degrees. In the three system you just need a central insurance man being more disciplined and one dimensional and two pivoting either side who can be more progressive, helping you to overload from deeper, harder to pick up positions.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. coys200

    coys200 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,418
    Ratings Received:
    +2,280 / 337 / -84
    The interesting thing is how effective it was yesterday.I honestly think it slightly confused Everton.Well more than slightly tbh.Theres some very knowledgeable people on here and even 24 hours later we can't really agree what it was.So imagine how Everton felt in real game time.Cant even begin to imagine adding Aurier and Rose to this,can't wait.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. lukespurs7

    lukespurs7 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,286
    Ratings Received:
    +3,041 / 334 / -198
    If it's 3-3-3-1 what positions are these?
    Also some commentators and Komean said it was a Diamond in front of the 5 so 5-4-1, it also looked to me quite like the 3-4-2-1 we played a lot last year.

    If I had to pick positions it would've come out as:
    Lloris GK

    Trippier RWB
    Toby RCB
    Sanchez CB
    Jan LCB
    Davies LWB

    Dier CDM
    Sissoko RCM
    Eriksen LCM
    Alli CAM

    Kane ST

    Some have also said it was a 4-1-4-1 but I don't think it was really as clear 5 at the back.
     
  8. lukespurs7

    lukespurs7 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,286
    Ratings Received:
    +3,041 / 334 / -198
    Brilliant simple overview love it!! And so yesterday's version could be called a 3-3-3-1 I suppose as people have said.
    Interesting stuff.
     
  9. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    37,002
    Ratings Received:
    +45,392 / 2,086 / -621

    I don't think Aurier and Rose would have been any better yesterday than Davies and Trippier (and I've not been a huge fan of Davies generally). I think Rose has become better while injured in everyone's mind. He's still a pretty wasteful player. That ball by Davies for Kane was as good as any I've seen Rose play. Wish we'd have bought Sessegnon, he'd have been the bollocks in this system after some developing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Like Like x 1
  10. GetSpurredOn

    GetSpurredOn Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,495
    Ratings Received:
    +4,629 / 93 / -29
    Lloris
    Alderweireld, Sanchez, Vertonghen
    Trippier, Dier, Davies
    Sissoko, Eriksen
    Alli
    Kane
    5 at the back, is much more like a 3 at the back, with advanced fullbacks. Sit them on the same row as the deepest of the midfield diamond. Suddenly it starts to resemble 3331, or rather 33211 anyway with Alli slightly higher up that Eriksen and Sissoko.
    Moving forward, this system makes so much more sense, as it would allow for any two player combination of Dembele, Winks or Onomah, sitting alongside Wanyama or Dier. Barkley seems like a good fit for that system too. Alli, Lamela, Eriksen could all play in that wider CM role too, with Son or even Kane as alternatives playing off the striker, where Llorente fits in.
     
  11. Locotoro

    Locotoro King of Zamunda

    Messages:
    5,516
    Ratings Received:
    +4,339 / 95 / -28
    I think it's a simple case.

    Poch can see when we play Trippier and Davies they need the defensive cover behind them when they venture high up the pitch. With Dier playing in a holding role it allows 3 CBs to split without compromising defensive solidity in the centre of the pitch. This allows them to join the attack quick high up and spread the opposition defence in turn giving space to Alli, Kane, Erikssen.

    We end up with two very good crossers of the ball pushed high up the pitch, Dier sitting deep and Sissokos athleticism providing the extra man at both ends when the ball transitions. If we did that against Burnley we'd have won comfortably.

    I'm not sure the same approach will be used when Aurier and Rose play.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2017
  12. SUIYHA

    SUIYHA Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    375
    Ratings Received:
    +1,561 / 67 / -18
    A big part of Poch's success IMO is that even our own fan base are having debates about what formation we've been playing. Back in the day it was 4-4-fackin-2, you knew roughly what everyone's role was on the pitch and how they were going to attack you. Now even we find it hard to identify exactly what the formation is. Must be an absolute nightmare for opposition managers and players to plan for - to understand where there are going to be gaps they can exploit and how they can track the runs of our players.

    Eriksen and Alli were both poor in the first few months of last season but once we switched to the 3-4-2-1 they both exploded into form because teams found it much harder to figure out the game plan, then we added Son into the mix in the final few months. Even when teams see our starting XI, they need to try and figure out who's playing where and what their roles are - and we will switch it up during the match.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    37,002
    Ratings Received:
    +45,392 / 2,086 / -621

    In possession it looked something like this:

    TA---------------Sanchez------------JV

    Trippier-------------------------Dier--------------------------Davies
    V----------------------------------------------------------------V
    Sissoko---------------Alli--------------------Eriksen
    V-------------------------------------------V
    Kane

    Without the ball:

    TA---------------Sanchez------------JV

    Trippier--------Sissoko---------------Dier-------------Eriksen--------Davies

    ------------Alli

    Kane​
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. JimmyG2

    JimmyG2 SC Supporter

    Messages:
    6,733
    Ratings Received:
    +4,424 / 193 / -43
    Was Lloris not playing yesterday or for the last 3 seasons?
    Never gets a mention.

    In any case we are strictly we are playing 3 at the back
    and an auxiliary sweeper keeper.
    I don't care what bloody Bielsa says

    If only the players wouldn't fuckin' run about so
    we might just get this sorted.
     
  15. bubble07

    bubble07 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    12,947
    Ratings Received:
    +7,058 / 382 / -77
    Diers skillset is ideal at being the screen
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. TottenhamMattSpur

    TottenhamMattSpur Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,472
    Ratings Received:
    +12,408 / 1,510 / -770
    Everyone goes on about Bielsa but he's never been at a top club and stood out.

    What's the fuss about? I know he is credited with developing the 4231 and the pressing style but it's not like he's a highly decorated winner is it?
     
  17. Trix

    Trix Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,534
    Ratings Received:
    +40,181 / 224 / -83
    I'm fairly sure Koeman didn't know what was going on tbh. Evertons midfield couldn't get close.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
  18. coys200

    coys200 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,418
    Ratings Received:
    +2,280 / 337 / -84
    I think bielsa is/will be almost like a famous artist.At the time of his creation he was mocked and not really understood.I think you need intelligent players to play his way.Maybe he never had them .And maybe it's only poch and pep success that has shown a light on him.Maybe he was just ahead of his time.
    For me the most notable think about yesterday was how isolated dier looked at times.There were moments in first 30 mins the centre of midfield looked really empty.But it may be poch feels so confident in back 3 personal it gives this formation more freedom.Maybe he was just waiting to get a Sanchez type player in.

    But as said preparing to play us must be a nightmare.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    37,002
    Ratings Received:
    +45,392 / 2,086 / -621

    He has won things; Championships in Argentina, runner up in their CL, Won the Olympics with Argentina, basically got Chile playing a great brand of football that saw them start winning things later on with his successors, got a very unfashionable Atletico Bilbao to the Europa Cup final (knocking out SAF's ManU on the way). In Europe he's never been given a top job with a club with a remote chance of winning much, part of that is possibly his personal reputation as slightly obsessive genius/lunatic (El Loco).

    More than anything he's seen as someone who's innovated and introduced ideas that have enabled some of the teams he's managed to over achieve through his tactical applications, and also a coach who's ideas - or the best bits of them - have influenced and been adopted and adapted by numerous other managers, some with incredible success.

    The first time I really started paying attention to him was after watching his Chile team at the 2010 WC, which was the only team I'd seen outplay that all conquering Spanish team, then again outplayed Brazil in the knockout stage but lost 3-0 just because Brazil had quality attackers and skanked them. His next job was Bilbao and I'd never seen a team rip apart a ManU team like his team did both home and away. I personally had never seen football so intoxicatingly ferocious, it was orgasmic.

    His methods are often not for the faint hearted, at their best they are high energy, ultra committed, super intense and as a result he can burn players out or just plain piss them off and his teams can often blow up, either in games or in later parts of seasons.

    His teams are always front foot, aggressive, proactive teams. Personally I love it, but I accept it's not always practical or workable, certainly not in it's purest form.
     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 4
  20. TheVoiceofReason

    TheVoiceofReason Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,087
    Ratings Received:
    +4,465 / 192 / -70
    The Karl Marx of football?
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page