1. The Transfer Rumours and SC ITK forums are now open :-)

Campbell abuse pair get convictions overturned

Discussion in 'Spurscommunity Front Page News' started by mawspurs, Sep 16, 2009.

  • by mawspurs, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:01 PM
  • mawspurs Moderator

    Member Since:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Message Count:
    15,475
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 2 / -6
    Source: PinkPaper

    A Spurs fan may sue Portsmouth police after his conviction for shouting homophobic abuse at player Sol Campbell is overturned.

    A 42-year old man and a 14-year old boy who were found guilty earlier this year of hurling homophobic abuse at football player Sol Campbell, say they may sue police after winning an appeal and having their convictions overturned.

    Ian Trow and the boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were sentenced to a three-year football banning order and a fine in May after allegedly chanting homophobic abuse at player Sol Campbell in a Portsmouth vs Tottenham Hotspur match at Fratton Park in September last year.

    However, after reviewing the case, Judge Ian Price ruled that even though chants of ‘gay boy’ could be heard in footage of the incident, there was no decisive evidence to prove that these chants came from Mr Trow and the boy. As a result he overturned the convictions and repealed their sentences. Speaking outside Portsmouth Crown Court, Mr Trow, of Milton Keynes, said:

    “I’m looking at a civil case against the police after this. It’s a relief that it’s been thrown out but it should never, ever have got this far. The initial decision was just disgraceful and I’m glad that in the end justice has been done.”

    The initial convictions coincided with an upsurge in movements aimed at wiping out homophobia in football. Kick It Out, which was initially founded in 1993 to tackle racism in the sport, now encompasses all types of bigotry in football. And in 2008, the Justin Campaign was created in memory of Justin Fashanu, the first openly gay football player, who committed suicide in 1998. Both are now dedicated to wiping out homophobia and prejudice in the game.

    Convictions against four others found guilty of hurling abuse at Campbell in the incident last year still stand.
  • Categories: Uncategorized

Comments

Discussion in 'Spurscommunity Front Page News' started by mawspurs, Sep 16, 2009.

  1. THE.FIEND!
    a great day for freedom of speech
  2. frosteye
    Whats the odds on us drawing Notts County in one of the cups this year!?

    Wonder if Campbell would celebrate if he scored against us?
  3. Woody10
    Get in!!

    I doubt this gets as much press as when they were all "guilty" though!!
  4. db1
    Great! I saw this on the news last night. End of a stupid episode hopefully
  5. Shirtfront
    Are you telling me that shouting "gay boy" is a criminal offence? Purile and offensive, sure. But a criminal offence?
  6. fatspur
    HTML:
    
    
    The point is not that racial or homophobic abuse is not a crime, it is that there was no substantial evidence that the 2 parties were involved, only that it occurred and they were there
  7. chivers!
    I think it comes under 'hate crimes' legislation.

    Sol, Sol, wherever you may be
    We totally respect your sexuality
    Your mental health and your right to privacy
    And your human right to leave on a free - you fucking Judas.
  8. JKSpurs
    I think it comes under 'hate crimes' legislation.

    Sol, Sol, wherever you may be
    We totally respect your sexuality
    Your mental health and your right to privacy
    And your human right to leave on a free - you fucking Judas.

    This is amazing, funniest thing I've read on here for ages !! :rofl:
  9. StokeSpur

    :rofl::rofl::rofl: pisser!
  10. StokeSpur
    Not at all, "there was no decisive evidence to prove that these chants came from Mr Trow and the boy" = they just couldnt prove it.
  11. Jaispurs

    Please let this catch on its f*cking hilarious:rofl:
  12. Equilibrium
    Please please please say we draw Notts County in the cup, this song needs to see the light of day!
  13. Shirtfront
    Thanks, I get the point. I was just curious that it was an offence in the first place. That is to say, irrespective of the evidence, I am surprised that the charge could be brought merely for calling someone "gay boy".
  14. worcestersauce
    Because they didn't do it, they were innocent:evil:

Share This Page