What's new

Chelsea make 4 year bid to land Wembley

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Telegraph being very slow. This was all discussed last week. It is actually good news as wembley are now open to the idea. It is unlikely everything will go through in time for chelsea so we might have one year then them 4.
 

Bilko

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2004
951
614
Chelsea fans posts make it clear they hope to screw Spurs out of it with their oligarchs money.
Shit fan base, shit manager, shit owner - hope first post is right and we can get in and clear off before the scum arrive
 

Jenko

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2004
5,290
4,157
Yeah, Chelsea are hoping they're theory proves to be a reality through the planning process in time for 2017. Even with the brown envelopes they will need a lot of good luck to go with that.
 

ebzrascal

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2009
2,635
4,670
Chelsea cannot hold the FA to ransom if they chose to give Spurs a year of playing at Wembley. Where else can Chelsea go?? West Ham won`t want them sharing for 4 years.. Twickenham don`t want football QPR and Fulham too small.. Arsenal won`t want them.. They need to play ball more than we do in my view..
 

Blake Griffin

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2011
14,133
38,225
butthurt spurs fans need to get over themselves and let the club do what is financially sensible and that's play at mk for a year. i also don't see the appeal of playing in a half-empty red bowl every other week either.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,628
Why can't we rent it for one year and then Chelsea rent it for the next four years? Then the FA get even more money.

Or just let us both rent it for a year. Other cities have clubs sharing grounds, it can't be that hard to make the arrangements.
 

Rocksuperstar

Isn't this fun? Isn't fun the best thing to have?
Jun 6, 2005
53,288
66,756
What the hell sort of stadium are they building that they need to evacuate for four years??? Absurd.
 
Top