What's new

Christian Pulisic

JayB

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2011
6,652
26,046
Pulisic plays best off the right and through the middle of an AM trio, Martial plays his best off the left of an AM trio or as a striker, I don't feel Martial is the problem in this scenario. The real question would be, how do we fit Lamela, Lucas and Pulisic?
Agreed, my gut feeling is that if we bring in Pulisic it would signal that Lamela is being sold. Pulisic would slot in as an alternative to Eriksen who can also play out wide, I just don't see how he and Lamela could coexist in the squad together if we were also bringing in another attacker (Martial).
 

Keefo

Active Member
May 13, 2018
337
718
Who said that? And who said both is not possible? Not that both deals will go through though, but one very likely, and the other quite possible, but dependent not in us
My bad.I thought utd doesn't want to deal with us at all.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
21,907
78,644
Who said that? And who said both is not possible? Not that both deals will go through though, but one very likely, and the other quite possible, but dependent not in us
I need to change my pants.....
......I'll probably need to change the replacement ones too.
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
Im guessing Pulisic is v likely and Martial is possible but depends on Utd being willing to sell to a rival or Toby needs to change his demands to Utd

I'm thinking the other way, with Martial likely & Pulisic possible. Don't forget ITK just stated we're aggressively going after Martial. Makes him most likely, no?
 

King of the Lane

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2010
4,099
23,566
I'm thinking the other way, with Martial likely & Pulisic possible. Don't forget ITK just stated we're aggressively going after Martial. Makes him most likely, no?

ITK also said Utd would rather sell abroad so who knows really. Either could be the very likely option. There seems to be less obstacles though in getting Pulisic imo
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
21,907
78,644
I'm thinking the other way, with Martial likely & Pulisic possible. Don't forget ITK just stated we're aggressively going after Martial. Makes him most likely, no?
You could flip it the other way and suggest that going after Martial aggressively means that we need to force it through more as it's harder to pull off. It could plausibly be the way you suggest but it could be either. Hmmm
 

George94

George
Feb 1, 2015
3,661
19,454
Who said that? And who said both is not possible? Not that both deals will go through though, but one very likely, and the other quite possible, but dependent not in us

I would love this - but I really can't see us signing both :confused:
 

Living Legend Colm G

SC Supporter
Jan 30, 2011
1,639
6,242
Who said that? And who said both is not possible? Not that both deals will go through though, but one very likely, and the other quite possible, but dependent not in us

We can't possibly have a chance of getting Pulisic, Martial, Sessengon, De Ligt and at least 1CM all for the 170 million mentioned though Herc so somethings gotta give!
 

deanostheyido

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2011
597
5,949
We can't possibly have a chance of getting Pulisic, Martial, Sessengon, De Ligt and at least 1CM all for the 170 million mentioned though Herc so somethings gotta give!
2 Out of the 3 (pullisic, martial, sessegnon) IMO. If we get 2, then i guess Eriksen drops deeper so we don't have to buy a TOP class CM?
 
Top