What's new

Daily Mal - £25m David Villa ?

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
Interesting - please expand.

My view is that Rebrov was a good player in a very specific system - an incredibly drilled and disciplined Dinamo Kiev team, which at that time was effectively the Ukrainian national team. Kiev's pass-and-move style of football, with two small not very strong guys up front - Shevchenko & Rebrov - worked in Europe, but would have been less effective in an aggressive, physical league like the EPL.

And that's exactly why he was a bad signing for us. He was still a good player. And I did say that if Villa did come to us, he may be a good player, but still a bad signing because of the money spent. A bad signing isn't simply a question of a player not playing well for the club he signs for. What if Villa came, played really well with Keane, but had major problems with Berbatov? What then? Sell Berbatov? Sell Villa on?

And even if we only ended up spending a small amount. Let's take your figure of £6 million. For a million more we could activate Poulsen's release clause, a player for a position we need to strengthen. Or even worse, let's say we end up only spending £6 million for Villa, but then we go for another player we really need and he's £2 million pounds outside the budget. We either don't get him or go above budget to sign him, possibly affecting our summer transfer budget.

All these permutations have to be taken into consideration before we approach a player. Right now, the defence and midfield should come first. Our strikers do not need improvement. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

justfookinhitit

Jedi Master
Aug 4, 2006
1,206
0
If we were to spend £26m in January I'd much rather we spent half of it on a central defender and the other half on a midfielder than blow it all on a striker. And if Paulsen were available for £7m that leaves an awful lot of cash left over.
 

chinaman

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2003
17,974
12,423
His agent said it is possible if we provide a better financial package. There's no chance of it we can better what Manure and Chelscum can offer. So don't even hope for it.
 

bogosian

New Member
Aug 29, 2006
621
0
just one more striker won't be enough - we need 2 at least. sell some starter in midfield if money is a problem. :whistle:
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
Hi DC Boy. Yup - I entirely accept I may be making 2+2 = um, something ridiculous, and over-complicating things! :wink:

I was going to add "football is a game of opinions", but that's the kind of inanity that Alan Shearer gets paid megabucks to utter on MOTD, and I think we should all leave the cutting-edge analysis to him. :)

:) yanno
 

Kushal

Banned
Jul 28, 2004
2,976
1,963
Will be great playing in front of a player like Fabregas I must say.

Should we just get both for 26 mil. then? :wink:

P.S: He'll end up at a club way bigger than us - no doubt about this.
 

justfookinhitit

Jedi Master
Aug 4, 2006
1,206
0
The way Bent is playing at the moment it has to be a hell of a lot more than Bent + £10m.

Anyway, this is irrelevant. David Villa isn't coming to the home of the yids. Get over it.
 

Defsta

Banned
Aug 4, 2003
23,455
6
Well Valencia is out from euro cups now, so there could be chances to get him in January :think:
 

justfookinhitit

Jedi Master
Aug 4, 2006
1,206
0
This all reminds me of last summer and the summer before when we were linked with every dutch guy that had ever kicked a football, only to end up with none of them.
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898
Well Valencia is out from euro cups now, so there could be chances to get him in January :think:

For all the big clubs, yes... For us, no...

For the money Villa'd cost, we could get a centre back, defensive midfielder and a left winger...
 
Top