What's new

Dear Mr. Modric

spud

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2003
5,850
8,794
Dear Mr. Modric

You may be aware that a number of english newspapers are running a story purporting to contain quotes from you. While I am reluctant to believe that you have indeed said these things, I fear that these organs would not have run the risk of a libel case for the sake of a football 'exclusive', however sensational the story may be. I therefore reluctantly assume that you did say them. If you did not, then please excuse me for what I am about to say.

First, I do not share your opinion about Chelsea being a 'great club'. They are a club which first tasted success as recently as 1955 (and not again until 1970) and historically were always vying with West Ham for the claim to be the third biggest club in London. It is only since the injections of cash by first Matthew Harding and then Roman Abrahmovitch that they have become a media darling 'big club'. In my own humble opinion they are a detestable ensemble of arrogance and a shining example of all that is wrong with the modern game. Their followers include a larger-than-typical collection of neanderthals and so, frankly, does their squad. So far from being 'one of the best clubs in the world', they are, I would contend, one of the worst.

You say that the reason for wishing to leave is that you want to play in the Champion's League. It is a laudable objective, and one which I - and all my fellow Spurs fans - would want for you; in the white shirt of Tottenham. It is indeed unfortunate that we missed out on qualification last season, finishing six points behind Arsenal. Had we managed to take more than one point off of relegated West Ham and Blackpool, we would have been closer to that elusive fourth spot. Furthermore, had we won as few as eighteen points of the thirty on offer from matches against teams that finished in the bottom five places, then not only would you be playing Champions League Football with Spurs next season, but Arsenal would have missed out on qualification. A win-win, if you like.

While I do not wish to lay blame for that abject failure against the league's poorest teams entirely at your door, I am sure that you will agree that, as a key member of the team, you are at least partly culpable. Do you not feel that you and your colleagues were good enough to finish in the top four and have therefore failed each other, the management, the fans and the club? Do you not therefore feel that you might have a moral obligation to all of the fans who love you (a feeling which you say that you reciprocate) to right that wrong? To stay with the club who - as you have said on numerous occasions - brought you to the 'big time' of one of the best leagues in the world?

You say that you want ...."to go in a good way, a friendly way....". That is doubtless the best way to leave a relationship, and I would wish you success in that endeavour. I have to tell you, though, that leaving now - when the Chairman has categorically stated that none of the club's best players will be sold - and leaving to a club that most of the fans who idolise you detest with a passion, means that your wish is doomed to failure. You will become a pariah at White Hart Lane and, frankly, it will be deserved.

You also say that you will not request a transfer because "that would be disrespectful". I believe that you are correct: it would. But is it not disrespectful for you to give interviews of this type to national newspapers? Have you not, by declaring a wish to leave in such a public way, effectively handed in a transfer request? While I would like to think that it isn't so, such an act is surely hypocrisy of the highest order.

If it were my decision, I would not accept any transfer fee from Chelsea, no matter how much money was offered. If you were set on leaving then I would not sell to any other english club; and I would only sell to a foreign club if the fee involved was substancially more than the existing world record. That at least would provide enough money to make the Northumberland Development Project viable and enable us to build a stadium to compete financially with other front-line clubs.

In conclusion, I would like to say how disappointed I am in your actions. I and many fellow Spurs fans have believed you to be a 'classy' individual. Somebody who values loyalty. Somebody with integrity. It seems that I was mistaken. It seems that you would be ideally suited to join the motley collection of human detritus plying its trade in SW6.

Sincerely,

spud
 

Azrael

Banned
May 23, 2004
9,377
14
A nice post, but I am afraid spud that you are in denial about the reality of the modern footballing world.

Unfortunately, loyalty doesn't count for shit.
 

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,338
54,974
Dear Spud

The working lifespan of a top flight footballer is very short, and can be ended by just one of the many challenges that a player like me attracts. Are Spurs going to offer me £130,000 per week?

pp Luka
 
Jun 4, 2007
97
52
It's true that what loyalty there was to the badge, club fans etc is a wistful memory, However, Modric was presented (not least by himself) as someone a little different from the money and fame chasing modern footballer.

It's a good post Spud and one from the heart and soul of Spurs, which when the money is banked and the medals (should Chelsea actually win any) are losing their shine is also very important.

Roman Gump, Lamps, Droogs, EBJT, the dick that is Jason Mawwiner, Rudolf Hess and Josef Goebbels, if you want Modric you should match the offer for Torres or crawl back under your mugging of the Russian people stone.
 
Jun 4, 2007
97
52
I like the conclusion and think it apt and fair in Modric's case. Just because players no longer value loyalty or integrity doesn't mean we as fans should lose sight of such things.
 

wooderz

James and SC Striker
May 18, 2006
8,766
4,507
Nice sentiment, but football isn't about loyalty, oh, unless you're a fan
 
Jun 21, 2005
905
107
Lets hope ManShitty enter the bidding to up the price. We dont have to sell to Chelsea, I'd rather he fucked off abroad, but if he has to go to another English club, Id rather it was City. We will get an inflated price and it stops Chelsea from improving. I dont think we that far behind there increasingly ageing team.
 

looby

Member
May 27, 2004
74
12
great post from a fan point of view..but the reality is alas, that it has nothing to do with how we look upon our club and how we would handle these kind of situations if it were us, but rather about earning as much money as possible in a relatively short career span. There are very few footballers out there that adamantly share the same feelings as a true fan of the club.
 

klinsmania72

Member
Jul 13, 2006
186
1
How do five years on The bench feel like?! Thats what er should have dine With Berba. We have to trade like they do in The NHL. Malouda and Drogba+ cash for Modders or sud off.
 

tottenham28

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2005
774
522
Sounds like Levy has grown a pair after all...well done that man!

Statement by Club Chairman, Daniel Levy
18 June 2011


"I wish to make it absolutely clear, as I have said previously, that none of our key players will be sold this summer. We are building a team for the future to consistently play at the highest level and retaining quality players is crucial to that.

"In respect of Luka Modric, we are not prepared to sell, at any price, to Chelsea Football Club or any other club.

"We made our stance on this issue abundantly clear in writing to Chelsea. They chose to ignore it and then subsequently made the offer public.

"For the avoidance of any doubt, let me reiterate that we shall not enter into any negotiations whatsoever, with any Club, regarding Luka.

"We now consider this matter closed."
 

BlazingSpurs2010

New Member
Aug 9, 2010
27
0
Daniel Levy cannot hold a player to ransom if Modric want's leave then he should be allowed to go & the club should wish him all the best at his new club.
 
Top