Financial Fair Play rules?

Discussion in 'General Football' started by kursaal, Jul 29, 2017.

  1. kursaal

    kursaal Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    787
    Ratings Received:
    +1,851 / 43 / -51
    Has FFP been completely abandoned by UEFA?
     
  2. Col_M

    Col_M Pointing out the Obvious

    Messages:
    7,435
    Ratings Received:
    +11,138 / 361 / -140
    Are you kidding? They are more rigorous then the Chinese regime during the One Child policy.

    Name me one club that had flouted the rules.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Ionman34

    Ionman34 SC Supporter

    Messages:
    4,651
    Ratings Received:
    +8,178 / 92 / -71
    Only one?
     
  4. Lilbaz

    Lilbaz Just call me Baz

    Messages:
    26,519
    Ratings Received:
    +39,486 / 734 / -238
  5. Sweech

    Sweech Swiggity Swooty

    Messages:
    5,560
    Ratings Received:
    +12,738 / 438 / -215
    They aren't gone it's just that teams have figured out how to completely get around them.

    Take City for example. Instead of the rich Sheikh directly pumping money into the team they create seperate companies. One to pump in tons of sponsorship money into the club and another to pay for all of Man City's employees so that those salaries are no longer on their record books for FFP. Plus the somewhat fake sponsorship money inflates their "earnings" meaning they can balance it out to match FFP regulations.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. worcestersauce

    worcestersauce "I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope

    Messages:
    15,230
    Ratings Received:
    +13,359 / 320 / -76
    Chelsea run a separate import export business where they import good young players with absolutely no intention of them ever playing for Chelsea, loan them out for a couple of years then export them, selling them on for a profit.
    30 players out on loan an average £10 to £15 million profit on each one is £300 to £450 million revenue, ffp my arse.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. Gb160

    Gb160 Aggressivity

    Messages:
    8,622
    Ratings Received:
    +25,781 / 221 / -109
    All true, plus the 'stealth' payments that are currently being made....basically a club agrees to pay a player x amount, which goes through the clubs books, and on their wage bill...but they also,through third parties top this players wages up with stealth payments, which as long as the player is paying tax on isn't illegal.
    So what the club publicly claim the players wages are, isn't always necessarily the whole story.
    Makes a complete mockery of FFP.
     
  8. fedupyid

    fedupyid Active Member

    Messages:
    628
    Ratings Received:
    +592 / 165 / -85
    I thought FFP rules got suspended for review when the new head of the FA came in.

    But in all honesty we should have never let these people buy our clubs.
    Kronke should be banned from running any type of sports team just look at the LA Rams.
    Abrahmovic is just a Putin crony and ex kgb operative and still a Russian agent in certain situations like buying the World Cup.
    Man City's owners are willing to actively rape all the resources of their country without pumping any money back in.

    Our owners are not innocent basically when people say scum rises to the top it can be used to describe the ownership of the Premier League.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. WorcesterTHFC

    WorcesterTHFC Active Member

    Messages:
    987
    Ratings Received:
    +1,161 / 40 / -14
    Sounds more like a people-smuggling racket than a football club.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. worcestersauce

    worcestersauce "I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope

    Messages:
    15,230
    Ratings Received:
    +13,359 / 320 / -76
    Wow! Your username is so apt.
     
  11. Col_M

    Col_M Pointing out the Obvious

    Messages:
    7,435
    Ratings Received:
    +11,138 / 361 / -140
    With all due respect, why would the PL or UEFA care about reinvestment in Qatar?
     
  12. nightgoat

    nightgoat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    23,793
    Ratings Received:
    +20,557 / 316 / -97
    Liverpool. But they were let off because they weren't in Europe.
     
  13. Geez

    Geez Badges? We don't need no stinking badges! Admin

    Messages:
    12,431
    Ratings Received:
    +2,996 / 33 / -7
  14. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,673
    Ratings Received:
    +5,455 / 61 / -11
    In the annexe (xi) that talks about things like sponsorships and external relationships, (along with other parts of the document) there is enough scope for a club like Man City to contravene the spirit of the regulations without breaking them. That is a matter of poor drafting, though goodness knows it must have been hard enough to try to list all the possible issues let alone make the provisions water-tight across all the different national jurisdictions and legal and financial conventions involved.
     
  15. Lilbaz

    Lilbaz Just call me Baz

    Messages:
    26,519
    Ratings Received:
    +39,486 / 734 / -238
    City were already investigated for that, was partly the reason they got the fine (i think?).
     
  16. worcestersauce

    worcestersauce "I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope

    Messages:
    15,230
    Ratings Received:
    +13,359 / 320 / -76
    Abu Dhabi and the UAE I think, Qatar is PSG, not that that negates your point though, sorry.
     
  17. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,673
    Ratings Received:
    +5,455 / 61 / -11
    A fine is just about the most inappropriate and ineffective penalty imaginable in the circumstances don't you think?

    I believe they also issued a warning, but all they have done is allow City to pay a small fee to cement a position where the base for all their calculations is higher than that for most competing clubs. Future performance and transgressions will be measured against an artificially high base, so what has it achieved other than to reinforce City's advantage?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  18. Lilbaz

    Lilbaz Just call me Baz

    Messages:
    26,519
    Ratings Received:
    +39,486 / 734 / -238
    Agree totally that fines are a stupid way to punish a club. Not just for ffp but racism? Do you think the fans of lazio give a shit about the club getting a €50k fine for their abuse? The only way it will be stamped out is if clubs are kicked out of competitions.

    I would have been more than happy to see city get a ban from europe for breaching the rules. But uefa are not really that bothered with the mega rich investing millions into their clubs what it was intended for was for clubs to not risk bankruptcy. Which you have to say has worked. Clubs getting around it by paying players through other means is more a matter for individual countries tax authorities, hence the raids in england, france italy and the spanish clamp down.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. shelfboy68

    shelfboy68 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,396
    Ratings Received:
    +6,147 / 476 / -180
    Still won't stop city and ambitious teams lime them pursuing domination.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. markiespurs

    markiespurs SC Supporter

    Messages:
    9,687
    Ratings Received:
    +8,577 / 147 / -38
    Did'nt City have some kind of meaningless lower squad limit for the CL because of them breaching FFP?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page