What's new

Good Week/Bad Week

Krafty

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2004
4,781
2,108
Good Week

Luka Modric

Stunning goal against Bolton, and a great through ball for the third goal, the only issue is why can’t he do that more often?

Wingers

Against Bolton Bale and Lennon were key, setting three of the four goals. Against Villa the flanks were the main outlet, although they were not as effective. Makes it strange that there are no natural backups for Bale and Lennon currently at the club.

Harry Redknapp

When he saw the front page of The Sun upon Hodgson’s appointment Harry must have thought he had dodged a bullet. Sure the initial response would have been fully behind him, but eventually the knives would have been out.

Harry Kane

A great end to his loan stint at Millwall, voted young player of the year, and he travelled to Villa Park. Will next season see him more involved at Spurs, even if we are in the Champions League?

Bad Week

Jermain Defoe

Poor JD. He didn’t get a minute of action this week, which at Bolton wasn’t surprising but when your team needs a goal and you’ve been warming up for twenty minutes, and even stripped ready once only to be told to sit down again, to then see your manager finally make his first sub in the 90th minute and take off the second striker for a defensive midfielder, you must wonder where your career is heading.

Defoe splits opinion on SC, and while he isn’t world class he is our top scorer yet this season he has seen a loanee (Adebayor – understandable), a free, old crock (Saha – surprising) and a tough tackling midfielder (Parker – inexplicable) get ahead of him in the pecking order. His lack of game time might have been tempered by a promise from his club boss that when he took over as England manager he would be selecting JD for the Euros, but with Hodgson in charge and other players getting game time and form, JD looks to have a summer sat on the beach wondering where his future lies.

Danny Rose

I think it was about 70 minutes in – definitely second half – where Rose goes into a challenge that could be described as ‘robust’. As the furore over reckless challenges has died, and he won most of the ball, the incident escaped much attention but I did think he was a little fortunate to get away with it.

Four days later and Rose gets a red for a dangerous lunge. He might have been leant on slightly, which might have unbalanced him, but the challenge was OTT and as a young player trying to grab your chance, you don’t want to be missing games through suspension

Old Spurs managers

Some of you might have heard of the daytime quiz show pointless. On an episode last week the question was ‘name a manager who won the FA cup from 1970 onwards’. The aim is to give an answer that none of the 100 people surveyed gave (a so called ‘Pointless answer’), and both Keith Burkinshaw and Terry Venables were pointless answers. While other, more recent managers were also missed by the uninformed 100, it shows how quickly legendary managers are forgotten.

Us fans.

Typical bloody Spurs eh? All they have to do is beat a woeful Aston Villa team to finish third and mean that not only do we finish above Arsenal, but we don’t have to worry about what happens in Munich on the 19th. Despite dominating the team finds it incapable of putting the ball in the back of the net from open play, and a glorious opportunity to redeem themselves for the terrible form of the last few months goes sliding by. It’s the hope that kills you.
 

Jenko

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2004
5,298
4,186
I would also put Sandro in as having a good week: has played exceedingly well in the last two games.

I think we are at a stage where one of Parker's main priorities will be to not get injured and miss the Euro's. Hate saying that but he has form. We need players at 100%, not 90% and its another reason why he should be second fiddle to Sandro next game and beyond in my opinion.
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Sandro is a far more positive player when he has the ball than Parker. He is quicker and harder in the tackle. After a period of playing after injury, he is for me the enforcer that Spurs have been lacking for long periods this season.
 

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
I would Van Der Vaart in the good week column as he has played very well. Gives his all for as long as he can which is increasingly longer though he tired against Villa.
Next to Modric he is our best player and at the heart of everything.

Definately Sandro too now that he has recovered from injuries is looking increasingly effective and positive.
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,221
64,289
Please to be remembering we were 1-0 down with ten men. Thank you please. Difficult whatever team you're playing against. Even Accrington. Who are they? Exactly.

Sandro looks a million times better. He is immense sometimes. Ubiquitous.
 

DreadySpur

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2006
1,037
642
Please to be remembering we were 1-0 down with ten men. Thank you please. Difficult whatever team you're playing against.

Agreed. However, judging by the commentary I was listening to we appeared to dominate most of the game (not that you would know it from the MOTD highlights). Having got the equaliser I could understand the decision to not bring on Defoe at that moment, but felt that we should still have given him a chance with 10 minutes to go and show the intent that we did want to go on and try to win the game. Anyway a win against Fulham should guarantee 4th and with a favourable wind, we might still pinch 3rd if Van Persie has an off day.
 

WhiteHeartLowe

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2004
1,916
1,452
Agreed. However, judging by the commentary I was listening to we appeared to dominate most of the game (not that you would know it from the MOTD highlights). Having got the equaliser I could understand the decision to not bring on Defoe at that moment, but felt that we should still have given him a chance with 10 minutes to go and show the intent that we did want to go on and try to win the game. Anyway a win against Fulham should guarantee 4th and with a favourable wind, we might still pinch 3rd if Van Persie has an off day.


But the bugger never does!
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,221
64,289
Agreed. However, judging by the commentary I was listening to we appeared to dominate most of the game (not that you would know it from the MOTD highlights). Having got the equaliser I could understand the decision to not bring on Defoe at that moment, but felt that we should still have given him a chance with 10 minutes to go and show the intent that we did want to go on and try to win the game. Anyway a win against Fulham should guarantee 4th and with a favourable wind, we might still pinch 3rd if Van Persie has an off day.

I'm not sure what Defoe would have given us, except upsetting the very precarious balance of the team. (They were still very keen to counter attack). I think some (not you) underestimate the job that VDV does when in possession as opposed to Mr Defoe.

It was a gamble after all, and I think I still side with Redknapp in not taking it. As although people say "well a point's no good, it didn't matter if we lost", maybe not according to the table but we've just started not losing again, so I think I'd rather the draw at the end of the day.
 
Top