- Aug 16, 2006
- 2,114
- 3,721
Which is precisely why VAR is a stupid idea. No one agrees on decisions even days later, so how is VAR gonna some anything?!So one ex ref says should have stood and 2 other ex refs said it was right to not stand. Wtf??
Which is precisely why VAR is a stupid idea. No one agrees on decisions even days later, so how is VAR gonna some anything?!So one ex ref says should have stood and 2 other ex refs said it was right to not stand. Wtf??
Which is precisely why VAR is a stupid idea. No one agrees on decisions even days later, so how is VAR gonna some anything?!
So one ex ref says should have stood and 2 other ex refs said it was right to not stand. Wtf??
Actually, that’s quite clear as a law. The problem is that feinting isn’t well defined. If stopping isn’t feinting, and I can’t see how it is feinting, then the Ref can still decide it’s unsportsmanlike behaviour.