Ground share OS

Discussion in 'The New Stadium' started by Graysonti, Jun 18, 2011.

  1. Graysonti

    Graysonti Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,058
    Ratings Received:
    +3,516 / 348 / -244
    Is it now a good idea to approach Spam about a ground share?

    We can't stay in this state forever - we will eventually go backwards and at a fast pace.

    Is this an option?
     
  2. TwoSaintsComeMarching

    TwoSaintsComeMarching PIMP-tastic

    Messages:
    2,303
    Ratings Received:
    +111 / 8 / -1
  3. opensaysme

    opensaysme Banned

    Messages:
    811
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    Shouldn't this be in the New Stadium forum.
     
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Banned

    Messages:
    9,377
    Ratings Received:
    +7 / 0 / -0
    I feel sick at this suggestion.
     
  5. Dan Ashcroft

    Dan Ashcroft Manstack vs The Gay Chimney

    Messages:
    6,404
    Ratings Received:
    +1,336 / 59 / -62
    Having to sub-let from them wouldn't do anything for our finances whatsoever (and we'd lose all our capital by giving up WHL).
     
  6. camaj

    camaj Posting too much

    Messages:
    8,185
    Ratings Received:
    +973 / 124 / -20
    I'd be happy sharing with a championship club, why not? It wouldn't make us as attractive a takeover target though as having it to ourselves.
     
  7. EastLondonYid

    EastLondonYid Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,121
    Ratings Received:
    +5,404 / 192 / -89


    :bang::bang::bang: your gonna be a star on SC..
     
  8. Spurs in Belgium

    Spurs in Belgium Active Member

    Messages:
    527
    Ratings Received:
    +343 / 12 / -3
    NO!!! Rather play Championship than move to Stratford
     
  9. sweetness

    sweetness Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,115
    Ratings Received:
    +862 / 52 / -16
    Groundsharing is out of the question due to restrictions in terms maximum number of allowed events (per week/month/year). That's what I heard anyway.

    Additionally, the porno dwarves don't want us on their patch, which I fully understand. Beware of the mighty yids!!!!!!!!!!!11
     
  10. ohh Teddy Teddy

    ohh Teddy Teddy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    378
    Ratings Received:
    +1,442 / 30 / -4
    The reason this particular groundshare wouldn't work is,

    West Ham's idea is to keep running track and the stadium intact, just decrease number of seats,

    Our idea is to demolish the stadium and rebuild the original NDP design.

    This is why we cant GS with them :)
     

Share This Page