What's new

How Barca went from 'Més que un club' to just another global superbrand

Dharmabum

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2003
8,274
12,242
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...lona-barca-went-mes-que-un-club-just-another/


The Madridification of Barcelona: How Barca went from 'Més que un club' to just another global superbrand


8 MARCH 2017 • 5:31PM
Part 1 - Empire State
“Barça is a global club. But the world is a big place, and right now we are occupying very little space.”

Josep Bartomeu, Barcelona president

Last September, Barcelona opened their first office in New York, and they decided to make a bit of an entrance. Outside the Waldorf Astoria where the club’s executives and officials were staying, the Barcelona flag flew alongside the Stars and Stripes. At night, the Empire State Building was lit up in the club’s red and blue colours. Ronaldinho made a surprise appearance at a Bronx secondary school and played football with gawping kids. “We want to get closer to our fans,” explained club president Josep Bartomeu.

But to discover the real reason for Barcelona’s visit, you had to go to an upmarket restaurant in midtown Manhattan. There, over a sumptuous liquid lunch, Bartomeu and vice-president Manel Arroyo spent the day schmoozing executives from some of Wall Street’s blue-chip companies: Morgan Stanley, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, BlackRock.

Since Bartomeu took over as president in 2014, he has had two main aims: to burnish the club’s global reputation, and then use that reputation to print money. His stated goal is to make Barcelona the first club in history to break €1 billion in revenue. And because Barcelona already make plenty of money in Spain, that money, as Bartomeu puts it, “must come from the international market”.

New York is Barcelona’s second overseas headquarters - the other is in Hong Kong - and part of an aggressive strategy to push the Barcelona brand into North America. A network of Barcelona soccer schools has been established across America and Canada, and Bartomeu himself has given lectures at Harvard Business School via video link. He told students: “We hope to become the most admired, cherished and global club in the world.” Two more offices, in Shanghai and Sao Paulo, are scheduled to open later this year.

Meanwhile, the club’s commercial department has been scouring its brains identifying new revenue streams. You can now get an FC Barcelona university qualification in anything from architecture to psychology to big data. You can buy a bottle of FC Barcelona Tempranillo red wine. You can even pay to hire the Barcelona team bus for a function. Barcelona, the football club built by Joan Gamper at the start of the 20th century as an expression of Catalan regional identity, is now a global brand being leveraged for purposes that are only tangentially connected with football.


Two days after celebrating the opening of an office that would hold just four employees, the Barcelona top brass were back at the Camp Nou, where they watched their team getting beaten 2-1 by Alaves.

Part 2 - The End Of The Road
“A year at Barcelona is like two anywhere else.”

Victor Valdes, former Barcelona goalkeeper

They were chanting Luis Enrique’s name at half-time on Saturday night. Celta Vigo were well on their way to a 5-0 drubbing; Lionel Messi scored one of those effortlessly dazzling goals you have seen him score a hundred times before; Barcelona were going back to the top of La Liga. “Lucho, we love you, please stay,” the fans sang. But it was a valediction rather than a benediction. For Enrique is already on his way out.

Enrique does Ironman triathlons in his spare time, but it had taken just three seasons for the Barcelona job to exhaust him. Historically speaking, it was a decent effort. Since the Second World War, only two Barcelona managers have ever made it past four seasons. Frank Rijkaard did five, and ended up a hollow, haunted husk of a man, his managerial career destroyed. Johan Cruyff did eight, and had a heart attack.

It is Barcelona’s torrential internal currents that make it one of the most draining jobs in football. At most English clubs, power traditionally flows in a linear fashion: upwards to the owner, downwards to the fans. Barcelona, by contrast, is owned by its fans: the 177,000 socios who do not simply watch games but vote in presidents, voice discontent, feed the media snowball. “A rumbling volcano,” is how Cruijff described it.

f you had to pinpoint an exact moment when Enrique decided he no longer wanted to sit on the volcano, it was three weeks ago at the Parc des Princes. That night, a shambolic Barcelona were destroyed 4-0 by Paris Saint-Germain in the last-16 of the Champions League. Watching PSG cut Enrique’s lethargic team to shreds, was a genuinely shocking experience: a watershed moment in the history of a great club. Since embarking on their golden era more than a decade ago, Barcelona have often been beaten. They have even been well beaten. But this was different. They were being bullied.


Afterwards, Enrique lost his cool. Grilled on his tactics by Catalonian television, he snapped: “I accept all the responsibility. But also when I win, I receive the same personal treatment in the interviews, the same tone that you are using to question me right now.” According to reports, the pair continued arguing after the cameras were switched off, and eventually had to be physically separated.

Five days later, the Camp Nou booed Enrique during a 2-1 win at home to Leganes. Ten days after that, Enrique resigned.

Part 3 - Reign Of Fire
“Money is secondary. Before anything else there should be principles, values. Barça has lost them.”

Johan Cruyff, 2015

For all the turmoil off the pitch, for all the quixotic results on it, Barcelona are not in crisis. Three big wins have put them top of La Liga, and even given them a faint hope of turning things around against PSG on Wednesday night. But there is a far more subtle and tectonic battle taking place at the world’s most famous football club, and it goes much deeper than their outgoing manager. In a way, it is a battle for Barcelona’s soul.

Joan Laporta was president of Barcelona between 2003 and 2010, and oversaw perhaps the most remarkable transformation in the club’s history. When he took over, the club had just finished sixth, their lowest position since the 1980s. Within three years, Frank Rijkaard had led Barcelona to their first ever Champions League title. When he departed, it was Laporta’s decision to turn down Jose Mourinho and appoint an untried coach called Pep Guardiola.


For a certain section of the Barcelona fanbase, Laporta’s reign was a return to the good old days. He brought back club legend Johan Cruyff as an adviser and appointed him honorary president. He invested heavily in La Masia, the club’s academy, which he calls “our dreams factory”. He believed in playing football the Cruyff way: a quick passing style that went all the way through the club, from the under sevens all the way to the first team. For a few golden years, on and off the pitch, Barcelona charmed the world.


But in 2010, Laporta was replaced by his former vice-president Sandro Rosell, who offered a different vision of the club’s future. Rosell, a former Nike executive, believed Barcelona needed to face up to the realities of the marketplace or get left behind. He accused Laporta of leaving the club in heavy debt, and promised a more robust financial model that would give Barcelona the financial clout to compete for the world’s best players. The signings of Neymar and Luis Suarez, for a combined total of around £120 million, gave Barcelona one of the most feared strike forces the sport has ever seen.

In 2014, Rosell was forced to step down in favour of his friend and ally Bartomeu, but the silverware continued to flow. Enrique’s Barcelona won the treble in 2015 and the double last season. This season, however, they have found the going somewhat tougher, with problems surfacing that have been brewing for a while.

Recruitment has been one: Suarez apart, Barcelona’s recent transfer history has been a catalogue of expensive failures. Much-heralded new signings like Arda Turan, Andre Gomes and Paco Alcacer have failed to make much of an impact. Established players like Dani Alves have been allowed to leave without being adequately replaced. The result is a strangely lop-sided Barcelona team: still good enough to beat most sides, but shockingly vulnerable on their off-days.

Meanwhile, the fabled La Masia production line is showing signs of drying up. Like his predecessor Tata Martino, Enrique has been accused by some Barcelona fans of neglecting the academy; in fact, over his three seasons he has given debuts to 16 La Masia graduates. And while the likes of Munir and Rafinha may yet establish themselves, the vast majority have simply not been good enough. Promising youngsters like Alex Grimaldo and Gerard Deulofeu have been let go. And so Barcelona have been forced to rely ever more heavily on the usual suspects: a small core of increasingly untouchable stars: Messi, Suarez, Neymar, Iniesta, Busquets, Pique.

Just how untouchable became apparent in January, when a club director called Pere Gratacos dared to venture an opinion about Messi that stopped short of raptuous eulogy. “Leo is one of the most important players in the team,” he said. “But Leo without Neymar, without Suarez, without Iniesta, without Pique, would not be as good a player. Although it is clear that he is the best player.” Within hours, Gratacos had been sacked.


Yet as Barcelona face up to the prospect of their earliest Champions League exit in seven years and a manager at the end of his tether, there has been some encouraging news too. The latest Deloitte Money League saw them overtake Real Madrid in terms of revenue for the first time since Deloitte started compiling the list two decades ago. At €620 million, it may still be some way short of Bartomeu’s €1 billion target. But off the pitch, Barcelona are making enormous strides.

Not that everyone is happy about it. Laporta, now frozen out, has been scathing in his criticism of the current regime. “It’s been a while since this board started destroying Barcelona,” he said. “The only thing they are doing is taking advantage of what we left, and dedicating themselves to their own business, doing their own thing.”

The state of Barcelona in 2017, then, can be summarised thus: an unbalanced squad hampered by poor recruitment but elevated by a clutch of genuine world-class stars, a two-tier dressing room, a neglected academy, and unprecedented commercial performance. Now, who does that remind you of?

Part 4 - Content Provider
“The best players pay for themselves.”

Jose Angel Sanchez, Real Madrid marketing manager, early 2000s

To understand the modern Barcelona, you need to understand the modern Real Madrid, and to understand both, you need to understand Manchester United. During the 1990s, United did not just dominate English football. They changed the way football clubs thought about generating money. They were the first club to exploit the emerging markets of east Asia, the first club to recognise the money-spinning potential of corporate hospitality, the first club to set up their own TV channel. By the turn of the century, they were the richest club in the world, and Real and Barcelona were among the many continental rivals looking on enviously.


Florentino Perez won the Real Madrid presidential election of 2000 on an audacious promise to poach Luis Figo from Barcelona. During the subsequent years, a period that came to be known as the “galacticos” era, Real embarked on one of the most stunning acquisition policies the sport had ever seen. Over four successive summers, Figo, Zinedine Zidane, Ronaldo and David Beckham arrived at the Bernabeu at a total cost of €218 million. Later years brought Kaka, Cristiano Ronaldo, Gareth Bale, James Rodriguez. When United signed Paul Pogba last summer, it ended an unbroken 16-year period during which Real had held the world transfer record.

If the spending seemed indiscriminate, there was a method to the madness, and it was inspired - believe it or not - by The Lion King. Real’s executives had studied the way Disney managed to create not just a box-office smash, but a long-term entertainment brand that generated merchandising and spin-off revenues long after the film had left the cinemas. That would be the Real model: put on a show, bring in the crowds, and then shake them down for every last cent.

United may have blazed the trail, but Real went further than anyone before in redefining a football club as content provider and the football itself as an entertainment commodity. “The best players pay for themselves,” explained Jose Angel Sanchez, the club’s marketing manager. “They will deliver the best performance and the best spectacle. Real Madrid is a brand, and the product - the players and the games - is the content. Everything we do flows from this.”


In July 2003, Madrid unveiled their latest signing: David Beckham. The press conference was held at 11am in order to make the evening news in Asia. It attracted the second-highest live television audience in history, after the funeral of Princess Diana. “That was a turning point, because of what he represented,” an unnamed Madrid director discloses in Sid Lowe’s Fear and Loathing in La Liga. “His arrival was the scientific proof that the spectacle was more important to us than the game itself.”

Results began to bear this out. Keeping their galaxy of stars happy and balancing the books required sacrifices to be made elsewhere. The focus on signing prime attacking players left the squad woefully unbalanced. Perez’s insistence on playing the stars at any cost saw a succession of coaches ushered out of the back door. Fringe and middle-ranking players began to complain that the galacticos were getting preferential treatment. Many were eased out, hollowing the squad still further. Results nosedived. For the first time since the early 1950s, Real went three consecutive seasons without a trophy. Meanwhile, the club’s training ground was sold to pay for further spending.

“Real Madrid has no game plan,” wrote Santiago Segurola in El País. “It is the product of a commercial idea that has relegated the actual sport to a secondary role. It spends enormous sums of money signing up stars, but they do not make a team. They are, rather, a disappointing mosaic, with some players in their twilight years, and others included solely for their commercial appeal.”


Just as Real were heading into their slump, Barcelona were emerging from theirs. Rijkaard led Barcelona to their second European Cup in 2006, and two years later he was replaced by Guardiola, who would win two more. And as Guardiola’s home-grown squad swept all before them, it was possible to see them as a rebuke to the entire galactico ideology, a triumph for the cantera, for localism, for organic talent. Just as Cruyff and Laporta had envisaged.

Off the pitch, however, something quite different was happening.

Part 5 - Forward
“To me, Madrid is a man and Barcelona is a woman. And it's a woman who's extremely vain.”

Carlos Ruiz Zafon, author

When Laporta wrested control of Barcelona in 2003, the club were in dire trouble. Wages were a whopping 88 per cent of income. The commercial operation was primitive. Laporta noted with chagrin that while United were charging €2 million for a friendly, Barcelona commanded just €300,000.

And so while Rijkaard and then Guardiola were taking La Masia’s finest right to the top, Laporta was busy turning Barcelona into a lean, mean commercial machine. He renegotiated the club’s debt payments. He went on a subscription drive that increased the club’s membership by more than 60 per cent. And when the opportunity presented itself, he was not averse to signing a galactico of his own. Rosell used his Nike contacts to seal the signing of Ronaldinho in 2003, who over subsequent seasons would be followed by the likes of Samuel Eto’o, Thierry Henry and Zlatan Ibrahimovic.


Unlike at Real, however, all this was done with a veneer of idealism. Barcelona would spend big, but as vice president Ferran Soriano put it, they would do so with “a responsibility to society beyond the sports arena”. In 2006, Barcelona made Unicef their first ever shirt “sponsor”, paying the organisation €7 million to carry their logo. Laporta, a staunch separatist, also aligned Barcelona closely with the Catalan independence movement. In recent years, the slogan “mes que un club” has become a convenient stick with which to beat Barcelona. But briefly, fleetingly, it seemed to ring true.

Once Rosell arrived, that changed. The Unicef logo was moved from the front of the shirt to the small of the back, the bit you tuck in. In came the Qatar Foundation, followed by Qatar Airways in 2013. And in stark contrast to Laporta, who frequently provoked criticism with his references to the “Spanish oppression” of Catalonia, when the region held an independence referendum in 2015, Bartomeu was not interested. “I will not voice an opinion,” he said. “We have always spoken about sport. We don’t take part in campaigns.”

Bartomeu, you suspect, is a man with little time for petty regional politics. His visions have a much broader scope. His next project is the expansion of the Camp Nou from 97,000 to 105,000, with the number of VIP seats rising from 1,800 to 10,000. For the first time, naming rights for the stadium will be sold to the highest bidder, who will likely have to fork out hundreds of millions of euros.


Naturally, the purists will squeal, but Bartomeu’s reponse is that in order to maintain Barcelona’s position at the top of world football, commercialisation is not an option, but an obligation. All of which brings us to perhaps the most important question of all. Does Barcelona make money to exist? Or does it now exist to make money?
 

Dharmabum

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2003
8,274
12,242
Part 6 - The Bounce Of A Ball
“Barcelona are a team that are slowly coming to the end.”

Bernd Schuster, former Barcelona player

Clubs like to tell us that financial success and football success are intimately linked, feeding off each other in a sort of virtuous circle. Win football. Make money. Use money to buy players. Win more football. Of course, they have to say that. It provides a flawless justification for their avarice, looks great on a boardroom Powerpoint presentation, and has the tangential advantage of sounding vaguely plausible.

But at the very highest levels of the game, the relationship is far more complex than that. The quote that perhaps best encapsulates Barcelona’s mission was given by Bartomeu in an interview with the Financial Times in December 2015. “The formula that has made clubs grow in the past was this: sporting success leads to social success, which in turn leads to economic success,” he explains. “But we want to develop in a way that not everything hangs on victories or defeats. We want to make sure that the club remains a reference around the world, even when there is a failure.”






Read those last two sentences back, and think very hard about what Bartomeu is envisioning here. What he is admitting, in essence, is that he believes the primary function of the modern football club is not merely to win, but to insure itself against the prospect of losing. Of course, Bartomeu is not indifferent to whether Barcelona win or lose. It is just that from a business point of view, he would prefer it not to matter.


This is a vision that gnaws at the very essence of what constitutes sport. All sporting competition, whatever it is, incorporates an element of uncertainty. The bounce of a ball. The luck of the draw. The vagaries of form and fitness and human frailty. The alchemy of a team and the randomness of human interaction. Play badly and win, and you still get three points. Play well and lose, and you still get none. However well you prepare, however much money you throw at your project, there are no guarantees.

Successful companies abhor this. Uncertainty is bad for investors, bad for the market, and thus bad for business. Which is why modern superclubs are so keen to eliminate sporting risk at every opportunity: whether it is maximising revenue, running the most thorough backroom operation, or using their clout to get the Champions League format rigged in their favour. Bartomeu, it may or may not surprise you to learn, is in favour of “wild cards” for big clubs who fail to qualify automatically for the Champions League.






On the pitch, you can never eliminate chance entirely. Off it, however, you can come incredibly close. Barcelona has engineered for itself the sort of financial strength that should ensure a steady supply of trophies for decades to come. But wittingly or not, they have bought into the same cycle of boom and bust that Madrid did more than a decade ago. For the same forces that generate stability in the boardroom often militate against it on the pitch.

The modern superclub is a restless beast. In order to keep the show on the road, it needs to keep reinventing itself, to attain a state of almost permanent transition. Every transfer window will bring fresh demands for star signings, whether or not the tactical system or the dressing room environment can handle them. The greenhouse of pressure created by fans and the media will impel instant solutions and instant judgement, new plotlines and new personalities. This is, after all, an entertainment product.





Madrid discovered this. Now Barcelona are discovering it too. Some seasons they will win everything. Others they will win nothing. But as long as the club is run sensibly, even their years of failure will constitute relative success. Here again, the United model is instructive. On the pitch, it has been a pretty wretched few years: a teetering spiral of decline, degradation and David Moyes. Yet on the balance sheet, they have still managed to grow their revenue for 12 straight years in a row, Champions League or no Champions League. If this is failure, then every club in the world would love a piece of it.






So Schuster is right and wrong at the same time. This is not the end for Barcelona, just one of an infinite number of ends and new beginnings stretching into eternity. Already, we have been seeing the stirrings of a genuinely decent side in recent weeks, with Enrique belatedly switching to 3-4-3 and Messi recapturing something close to his very best form.

But unless they rip up their model and start again, Barcelona’s successes will not look like the successes of the past. The game changes. There is little point comparing the current academy crop to the Messi generation: of the eight La Masia graduates who played in the 2011 Champions League final at Wembley, five made their debuts between 1998 and 2004, a period generally considered to be Barcelona’s nadir. Maybe if the likes of Sergi Samper or Adama Traore had emerged back then, they would have walked straight into the side. Maybe not.

Clubs change. Never again will there be a generation of academy graduates like that of the Guardiola era. Never again will there be a Barcelona shirt free of advertising. It may be regrettable, but if you aspire to play elite football in 2017, it is simply the price of doing business.

Barcelona are not in crisis. In a way, this is the point. It would take not just one catastrophe, but many, for Barcelona to be truly in crisis ever again.
 

Armstrong_11

Spurs makes me happy, you... not so much :)
Aug 3, 2011
8,608
19,289
One thing I didn't understand about them was not having a shirt sponsor. Think they held out for as long as they could but the income from it was just too tempting to ignore.

It was nice that the first season they had a "sponsor" and they gave it to UNICEF. and even now they make yearly donations.

Think they are a well run club and deserve their success.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,963
71,378
One thing I didn't understand about them was not having a shirt sponsor. Think they held out for as long as they could but the income from it was just too tempting to ignore.

It was nice that the first season they had a "sponsor" and they gave it to UNICEF. and even now they make yearly donations.

Think they are a well run club and deserve their success.
And now the sponsor is Qatar soooooo

They sold out for money while still trying to act different than Madrid. I guess its commedable they have academy products around as Madrid doesnt but bottom line is they have become increasingly like Real Madrid and they only become moreso by the day, in reality. They'll complete the transformation to a completely soul less team of mercenaries when Messi retires unless the board and management shifts philosophies dramatically.
 

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,804
And now the sponsor is Qatar soooooo

They sold out for money while still trying to act different than Madrid. I guess its commedable they have academy products around as Madrid doesnt but bottom line is they have become increasingly like Real Madrid and they only become moreso by the day, in reality. They'll complete the transformation to a completely soul less team of mercenaries when Messi retires unless the board and management shifts philosophies dramatically.
and then Rakuten for 55m a year. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-deal-with-japanese-internet-retailer-rakuten

If the debts they had were accurate, it makes sense that they would go down this route - they have to compete off the field as well. They did used to stand for something - the symbol of resistance against Franco, Catalan pride/nationalism, and a different philosophy of football with Cruyff and La Masia - and now they are less of that and more of just another football club run as a business. Which is a shame. I always favoured Barcelona over Real Madrid because they weren't such a cynical commercial machine, and now they are, I don't watch Spanish football at all. No interest whatsoever.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,963
71,378
and then Rakuten for 55m a year. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-deal-with-japanese-internet-retailer-rakuten

If the debts they had were accurate, it makes sense that they would go down this route - they have to compete off the field as well. They did used to stand for something - the symbol of resistance against Franco, Catalan pride/nationalism, and a different philosophy of football with Cruyff and La Masia - and now they are less of that and more of just another football club run as a business. Which is a shame. I always favoured Barcelona over Real Madrid because they weren't such a cynical commercial machine, and now they are, I don't watch Spanish football at all. No interest whatsoever.
Very hard to watch La Liga. Entertaining stuff and fun when the games are close but the obvious favoritsm of Real and Barca make it unwatchable. The favortism and slant is even more obvious than the FA's love in of United!
 

Armstrong_11

Spurs makes me happy, you... not so much :)
Aug 3, 2011
8,608
19,289
And now the sponsor is Qatar soooooo

They sold out for money while still trying to act different than Madrid. I guess its commedable they have academy products around as Madrid doesnt but bottom line is they have become increasingly like Real Madrid and they only become moreso by the day, in reality. They'll complete the transformation to a completely soul less team of mercenaries when Messi retires unless the board and management shifts philosophies dramatically.

Yeah but u can't blame them to finally deciding to get a shirt sponsor. Anyway UNICEF is still on the back of their jersey Iirc. Could have been worst then Qatari group.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,562
I have a friend from university who is a Barca fan (and I think member), who is very much one of the purists. He rants about a lot of what is mentioned in that article. How the president/regime is ruining the club, how bad Enrique is... I don't actually think he takes much pleasure from them winning, as he thinks its not the right way. I get the impression though that he is part of a sizeable number who think like that. The standards and ideology involved is both incredible and fascinating.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,026
29,600
One thing I didn't understand about them was not having a shirt sponsor. Think they held out for as long as they could but the income from it was just too tempting to ignore.

It was nice that the first season they had a "sponsor" and they gave it to UNICEF. and even now they make yearly donations.

Think they are a well run club and deserve their success.
The truth is barcelona were never a well run club, that is part of the problem

Under Rosell they have lost their values as a club but also resorted to constant infighting between influential people like Rosell, Cruyff and etc.

So then do you say go back to the old ways that turned them in to a great club, under Laporta. Then you overlooking how they got to that point, they were in a financial mess who spent way too much money on players they couldnt afford and had infighting in the dressing.
 

ExpatFan

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2005
1,878
1,680
Yeah but u can't blame them to finally deciding to get a shirt sponsor. Anyway UNICEF is still on the back of their jersey Iirc. Could have been worst then Qatari group.
From personal experience, there could be no worse association than one with Qataris.
 

Led's Zeppelin

Can't Re Member
May 28, 2013
7,353
20,226
It's sometimes easy to forget how hard it is to compete with Real Madrid in Spain.

Probably the world's biggest club, built on government support, still the darling of the establishment, it is incredible, as in genuinely unbelievable, that a club with any principles whatsoever let alone the high standards Barcelona have tried to reach for have been able to compete with RM at all, let alone beat them.

It often feels that there's an in-built bias towards RM that's a repository for the dark side of our nature. We overlook bullying and dirty dealing and accept the corrupting power of money and political influence where they are concerned but berate Barcelona for dropping their principles because they dare to accept shirt sponsorships.
 
Top