- Jan 9, 2014
- 14,914
- 26,616
We need a couple of players (especially CM) from a shelf we would never dream of signing from before.
Last edited:
I think we miss an outfield player with buckets of experience who can come off the bench and settle things down. Somebody like Banega would be great. he could be our modern Edgar Davids or Rafa VDV. I'm sure there are plenty of others. Maybe we need to forget about resale value once in a while.
Pointless if he doesnt up his game in tactics and game managementBuy more quality players that Poch wants.
I think we miss an outfield player with buckets of experience who can come off the bench and settle things down. Somebody like Banega would be great. he could be our modern Edgar Davids or Rafa VDV. I'm sure there are plenty of others. Maybe we need to forget about resale value once in a while.
Sheiks on a plane
Hmmm that sounds like everything then?Technically better, definitely. Mind you, that's pretty obvious when Sissoko starts 24 games for you in a season. Paying more money is just a means to achieving that tbh - it allows you to retain your best players and attract better. Keeping the same core of players is important too - we don't have the sort of money needed to effectively rebuild an team in one close season and remain competitive.
Right now we need to look at picking up more homegrown players, particularly younger ones. We need to ensure that non-homegrown players are a direct improvement on what we have, or a potential improvement. We haven't got as much room to manoeuvre as I'd like.
We also need to identify upcoming replacements for a couple of specific positions. I'd say goalkeeper is one, CM, Eriksen, probably CF. Getting in Foyth and Sanchez was perfect before this year, knowing Toby's issues with injuries and his always-on-the-cards transfer. Lloris is starting to fray a bit at the edges, and obviously Vorm's time is running out. In CM, we are concerned about Winks and Wanyama's recovery from injury, Dembele's likely departure, and Sissoko's...being Sissoko. Losing Eriksen without a ready replacement would be disastrous, although I think Lamela can do a job. Pulisic would obviously be mint here. Then there's Kane - I mean, Son does a decent job, but we really should have a more better option there.
Finally, I would be happier if I had more confidence in Poch's decision-making and adaptability, but there's still room for that to develop. It's pretty damn good most of the time.
So - technically better, dealing with the homegrown rules, specific squad improvements, Poch growing into the role at the top table. Most of that goes hand in hand with paying more money for wages and transfer fees.
What we need is slow, incremental improvement along the lines of what we have been doing since Pochettino arrived. We don't need any upheavals in our approach. We're still improving and we haven't stalled this season - we've just played 38 league games away from home and we've qualified for the Champions League with some ease anyway.
If there's a £40m signing like Sanchez that we can make to improve the first team, great, let's go for it, but we don't need more expensive players than that and we don't need, or even want, established "stars". We just need to build the team. The consistent message from all the players, even the ones who might be thinking of leaving, is that it's a squad of friends who love working together. We don't want to disrupt that. There is no individual player and no position that needs improving that is as important as preserving and developing that sense of "team". It's our one advantage over the richer clubs, because we have a manager who prioritises it over star individuals whom we cannot afford.
As for Pochettino improving his in-game management, I'm afraid I won't take seriously the views on tactics and selection of a group of drama-queens who start shrieking for half-time substitutions every time we aren't 2 goals ahead by the break. No one makes half-time substitutions unless they are losing, badly, or someone is injured. No one. Repeat. No one. So please spare me the "Pochettino is too late changing things. He's not. You're all too panicky. Pochettino is still in his 40s. He'll learn.
Nooooo, I live in said city
People are quick to point the finger at the other clubs who spend a lot of money but its worth noting that they have been spending money in the last 2 seasons to catch up to usMoney.
It's why those that spend vast amounts more than us, tend to win the trophies and titles.
Of course, this doesn't guarantee the league title every year, you've only to look at Chelsea this season to realise this.
But, they're in a FA cup final as a consolation. Those that spend the most, tend to win things more reguarly.
Being controversial by using the latest buzz phrase about Pochettinho " in game management " is a load of rubbish and to sight Juventus and Manchester United as legitimate examples because we lost is totally unfair imo take United, Dembele decided to be clever and was out muscled by Pogba ( a player mistake) nothing to do with tactics. Juventus threw the dice and made a tactical change they were losing after being behind and fair enough we were caught out a bit cold I wouldn't put that down to Pochettinho solely our players needed also to see what was going on, Juve had the experience and closed shop we were just unlucky they scored in quick succession.Again I am going to be controversial and say what would help us to go to the next level is Poch also stepping up in his tactical and game management. Two games that stand out where he was found wanting, were the quarter finals against Juventus and the semifinals against Man Utd. I put our conceding those game solely at the feet of Poch, where his naivety was exposed. There were other games where we were fortunate to get a result despite his poor selection and game management. Not saying that this is the answer to the next level but without an improvement in his management, getting to the next level will be difficult in spite of any financial windfall we may get.