- Sep 28, 2013
- 16,163
- 25,473
If I had known I can earn one million every 2 - 3 months on average, I would have skipped all my education and start training at 7.
Jeez, those salaries..
Jeez, those salaries..
@Spurrific I see your up to your naughty tricks again. Pop your tampon back in and be a good girl
Judging by that sight of Jon Arne Riise's wage slip from several years ago, for most clubs the bonuses are usually team based. IIRC, the bonuses were for PL and CL appearances and wins. Appear as a team, win as a team, lose as a team.I have very little doubt our players can earn considerably more than their basic. I would love to know how it's fair on less glamorous players.
How could Wanyama, Winks, Dembélé, Sissoko get much more?
Even the defenders, a clean sheet bonus?
Danny Rose is gonna be fucked off of Dier has a brain fart and we concede if Danny worked his socks off for 90 minutes.
He was a defender mate, im not sure what your point is but strikers are very often on goal bonuses.Judging by that sight of Jon Arne Riise's wage slip from several years ago, for most clubs the bonuses are usually team based. IIRC, the bonuses were for PL and CL appearances and wins. Appear as a team, win as a team, lose as a team.
Individual bonuses for goals face an obvious massive flaw; you don't pass to a team mate who has a vastly better chance of scoring than you do(unless the team mate is Sissoko). At it's worst, one player gets an easy chance for bonuses as he's the designated penalty taker. Also, take the example of Kane's first goal on Tuesday. With an individual goal bonus, how does Eriksen benefit from his superbly hit fk? Ah, an assist bonus, you say? Again, a built-in discriminator against those who never take fks. What about Danny Rose, whose attacking run led to the foul that gave it? As can be seen, individual bonuses mainly serve to divide a team and not fully reward it.
He scored more goals than most defenders, mate, so if that was a criterion for Liverpool's player bonuses, it would have been on that slip and it wasn't.He was a defender mate, im not sure what your point is but strikers are very often on goal bonuses.
Id love to see what evidence you're basing this on as it sounds like nonsense.He scored more goals than most defenders, mate, so if that was a criterion for Liverpool's player bonuses, it would have been on that slip and it wasn't.
I'll explain my point again, because I obviously wasn't clear enough: individual goal bonuses can often result in a team scoring less goals.
Of course there would be goal bonuses. It's an obvious mistake to make, as with performance related pay in business.Id love to see what evidence you're basing this on as it sounds like nonsense.
If it was as simple as you try to make out then there would be no goal bonuses...but thats not the case.
Control a ball with just a single touch once in every ten attempts?How could [...] Sissoko get much more?
I dispute the 'individual goal bonuses can often result in a team scoring less goals' bit...what evidence are you basing that on?Of course there would be goal bonuses. It's an obvious mistake to make, as with performance related pay in business.
You don't accept the main premise, that goals usually come from a team and not usually from one individual's supreme ability. You were probably supporting Benteke a few weeks ago, when he grabbed the ball to take a last minute penalty and lost the chance of a win.
It's based on the premise I set out. You seem to be suggesting that individual goal bonuses would never result in players trying to score goals from very difficult chances, when they have team mates in far superior positions. Is that what you believe?I dispute the 'individual goal bonuses can often result in a team scoring less goals' bit...what evidence are you basing that on?
I'll repeat, if that were true there would be no goal bonuses.
At one of those evenings with past players I went to recently, Graham Roberts said that Harry had a basic of £110k but got £10k win bonus and another £10k a goal, so he's doing pretty well lately!Oh look, he has the same basic salary as Chelsea's most important player. No news story about that though is there?
Levy has got exactly the right idea in my opinion - pay sensibly but incentivise heavily. I wonder what Kane's goal bonus is...
Judging by that sight of Jon Arne Riise's wage slip from several years ago, for most clubs the bonuses are usually team based. IIRC, the bonuses were for PL and CL appearances and wins. Appear as a team, win as a team, lose as a team.
Individual bonuses for goals face an obvious massive flaw; you don't pass to a team mate who has a vastly better chance of scoring than you do(unless the team mate is Sissoko). At it's worst, one player gets an easy chance for bonuses as he's the designated penalty taker. Also, take the example of Kane's first goal on Tuesday. With an individual goal bonus, how does Eriksen benefit from his superbly hit fk? Ah, an assist bonus, you say? Again, a built-in discriminator against those who never take fks. What about Danny Rose, whose attacking run led to the foul that gave it? As can be seen, individual bonuses mainly serve to divide a team and not fully reward it.
Now that is embarrassingDaniel Sturridge on £150k p/w!!
Bet he's not embarrassed about it lol.Now that is embarrassing
You can see how why he will never leave Liverpool, anyone else would only offer a pay as you play dealBet he's not embarrassed about it lol.