- Jul 9, 2007
- 12,780
- 13,817
No. My scenario is not if HE came 14th last year, it's if the team came 14th last year and this was his first season. I think most clubs would sack him in this position. The only reason people want to keep him is because of sentimentality and there's no room for that in business, if you were the best navigator in the world back in the day but you are clearly driving the ship straight towards an iceberg, somebody will stop you.
As I said before, the difference between this year and 2015 is that Vardy, Mahrez, Drinkwater, Schmeichel and co have all signed big new contracts - believe some are even as high as £100k. They absolutely cannot afford to get relegated. Even if they were smart and brought in paycut clauses, their squad will be ripped to pieces if they go down and they will struggle to come back up IMO. Relegation is expensive.
The European run has been good though so the timing of the sacking does surprise me. Maybe they'll bring in Di Matteo and he'll turn the second leg around like he did after AVB lost to Napoli.
If this was Ranieri's first season, and last season never happened, sacking him would be harsh. Mostly because while Leicester did end up 14 they spent most the season 20th in the table. If they get relegated sell your big earners, many would be more than happy to take them. Anyway they would still have the PL money next season, so if they bounce back up its not an issue.
There are many reasons why sacking him is absurd. Namely that he has done something that was pretty much impossible, something which he deserves to be trusted and have patience rewarded to him. Ultimately, Leicester will never achieve such a feat again, and Ranieri should be given a lot of lee-way, if not a free pass, based on the success he has bought.
Secondly, talk about the business. Out of all the possible candidates only one seems suited to this kind of situation more than Ranieri, thats Hiddink, all the other candidates are not exactly managers who have shown a lot in a dog-fight. Secondly, forget this season, who could stand as being a long term manager and why should they be deemed more suited to the role.
At the moment there hasn't been a managerial appointment and it suggests that there is a distinct lack of a coherent plan. Someone could come in and turn it around, but I actually don't believe that is a given and don't see who is lined up that will offer Leicester that impetus. I don't think this change is good business, I think it is pretty clueless running of a club frankly, and will cause the board all kinds of reputation issues.
If managers begin thinking that Leicester will not treat them well, despite having done a lot, there is a good chance managers will not want work for Leicester. Which seems might well be the case with Mancini (who by the way would be a dreadful choice).