- May 26, 2004
- 3,496
- 3,608
It's no coincidence to me that their dominance ended with the outlawing of the back pass.
I am definitely going to wind a few people up with that line. :up:
It's no coincidence to me that their dominance ended with the outlawing of the back pass.
Get ready for an hour long lecture on how they transformed the very game itself in the 70's and 80's. So cataclysmic was the shift that they caused that it lead to them becoming shite, having a brief upturn for a decade and now are sliping back into averageness.I am definitely going to wind a few people up with that line. :up:
So here is there newest attempt to justify themselves
And it's very popular on 9Gag. I hate them so much.
He didn't call him "black" did he? Wasn't it "negro"? Also, wtf is "allways"?
Some do talk sense, but they are few and far between.
Anyone that has me on facebook will have seen the "discussion" I had with 2 liverpool fans They really are a clueless bunch, except the third liverpool fan who goes to uni with me wrote this..
"What irritates me most about the whole Suarez racism issue is this. He was found guilty, fined some money (which he can easily afford), and banned for eight games. If a fan had been found guilty of an identical offense, they would have been banned from all grounds for a number of years, and have to give up passport etc whenever their national team plays. One rule for players, one rule for fans, it's not a great way of dealing with things. If the man is guilty, and he was found guilty, then he should be punished equally to a fan. This from a Liverpool fan, by the way. I think Dalglish is right for defending his player, but wrong for not separating his player and racism. It would have been much better to say "I don't support racism, but I will forgive my player for his actions, and back him in this time where he needs support." I also think Suarez should have been made to donate money to an anti-racism charity."
Some do talk sense, but they are few and far between.