- May 14, 2007
- 14,455
- 18,975
For starters he'll be on a lot more money than Danny Rose and I don't see Rose getting dropped any time soon. You can't have a player sat on the bench on significantly higher wages than the one he can't get past. It would lead to a major round of pay increases (e.g. Kyle Walker would deserve the same money as Rose). It would cause a whole load of disruption for a player we don't actually need.
Why would he have to be on the same wages as he is at United? He's barely played and his stock has fallen, of course a lot would be up to him wanting to have a new start with a reduced wage.