MOTD thread
- Thread starter prawnsandwich
- Start date
RichieS
Well-Known Member
- Dec 23, 2004
- 11,916
- 16,436
Because he kicked the other bloke with no intention of playing the ball.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
It was a yellow. He tripped him. It wasn't dangerous or violent, he wasn't through on goal.
Shadydan
Well-Known Member
- Jul 7, 2012
- 38,247
- 104,143
He tripped him up, it's a tactical foul which should only be a booking, if it were a professional foul then that's a different matter.
slartibartfast
Grunge baby forever
- Oct 21, 2012
- 18,320
- 33,955
Never a red I agree.
But in my humble opinion it should be.
A foul imo should be an attempt to win the ball but accidentally impeding an opponent, injuring him or dangerous play.
It shouldnt be blatant cheating and thats what it is.
They call it a cynical challenge as if that somehow makes it more acceptable but its cheating.
I'd like to see that kind of challenge treated far more seriously than it is.
Chelsea and Man U would be fked.
But in my humble opinion it should be.
A foul imo should be an attempt to win the ball but accidentally impeding an opponent, injuring him or dangerous play.
It shouldnt be blatant cheating and thats what it is.
They call it a cynical challenge as if that somehow makes it more acceptable but its cheating.
I'd like to see that kind of challenge treated far more seriously than it is.
Chelsea and Man U would be fked.
TheChosenOne
A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
- Dec 13, 2005
- 48,097
- 50,096
The 'spirit of the game' went outta the window yonks ago. Sad but true.
I could see this coming. We were warned. Charlie Buchan's ghost whispered me back in the 1960's
Sandros Shiny Head
Well-Known Member
- Aug 20, 2013
- 4,794
- 8,765
"Were you surprised Harry started today?" "No not really, but lets immediately start talking about his wages" 
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,893
- 41,569
Was about to say the same thingLike how Lawrenson immediately turns a question about Kane starting against Wimbledon into an issue about wages.
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,684
- 104,964
In fairness to lawro and kilbane they did agree it would be nice if Kane stayed at Spurs his whole career.
slartibartfast
Grunge baby forever
- Oct 21, 2012
- 18,320
- 33,955
WhatLike how Lawrenson immediately turns a question about Kane starting against Wimbledon into an issue about wages.
The
Fuck
Was
That???
Thats a post match analysis?
Even managed to get Liverpool a mention.
Arsehole.
BehindEnemyLines
Twisting a Melon with the Rev. Black Grape
- Apr 13, 2006
- 4,634
- 13,382
kilbane glancing across as if to say "who the hell is this pissy tramp sat next to me".........hears a load of complete bollocks, "oh, it's Lawrenson!"
