Mourinho accuses Chelsea’s rivals of ‘buying’ the Premier League title

Discussion in 'General Football' started by Vwbottom, Jul 26, 2015.

  1. TaoistMonkey

    TaoistMonkey What would Phil Dunphy do? Staff

    Messages:
    32,449
    Media:
    9
    Albums:
    2
    Ratings Received:
    +33,629 / 501 / -186
    Of course we would and we would have "Bought the title" should we win it. My opinion remains the same.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. SteveH

    SteveH BSoDL candidate for SW London

    Messages:
    7,518
    Ratings Received:
    +7,928 / 444 / -132
    we have 'bought 5th place' already - so it's a start

    Arsenal deserve the title 'when you compare them to the others'.

    Liverpool are trying to rent the title!
     
  3. TaoistMonkey

    TaoistMonkey What would Phil Dunphy do? Staff

    Messages:
    32,449
    Media:
    9
    Albums:
    2
    Ratings Received:
    +33,629 / 501 / -186
    We've not "bought" anything. We didn't suddenly come in to loads of money. Any money we have earn't has been done via successes on and off the pitch.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. nailsy

    nailsy SC Supporter

    Messages:
    16,416
    Ratings Received:
    +15,108 / 106 / -47
    Who was the last side to win the title without "buying it"? Leeds? The United side with all the kids in it?
     
  5. Good Doctor M

    Good Doctor M Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,480
    Ratings Received:
    +7,315 / 228 / -52
    Troll level expert there from Mourhinho.

    I reckon he just says stuff like this so he can sit back and enjoy the meltdown.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,870
    Ratings Received:
    +5,919 / 64 / -11
    You seem to be slightly missing the point.

    When Spurs were one of the richest clubs in the country it was because they were one of the most attractive and popular clubs in the country. Their ability to buy the best players depended on their being very, very good at providing entertaining, quality football. That sort of "buying the title" (which we were never that good at, actually!) is quite different from buying it with money that some mega-wealthy oil or gas thief decides to channel through some random football club.

    When Manu or Arsenal won the title, though it hurts me to say it, they did it within the context of the sport. ManCity and Chelsea didn't, they simply bought it, and there's a fundamental difference there.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. spursfan77

    spursfan77 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,744
    Ratings Received:
    +17,484 / 565 / -140
    As always. I hate the way the press butter up to him in this country. In both Spain and Italy I don't think they let him get away with it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. Gassin's finest

    Gassin's finest Donne moi la balle, et je fais le reste...

    Messages:
    11,811
    Ratings Received:
    +18,451 / 371 / -98
    He's a canny operator, isn't he?
     
  9. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,870
    Ratings Received:
    +5,919 / 64 / -11
    He's a ****.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Japhet

    Japhet Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,706
    Ratings Received:
    +9,708 / 291 / -58
    Gotta love him really. Drops a grenade and sits back to watch the chaos that ensues. He knows how to entertain himself.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. nailsy

    nailsy SC Supporter

    Messages:
    16,416
    Ratings Received:
    +15,108 / 106 / -47
    I don't think I'm missing the point, we seem to be getting at the same thing if anything. The last time the league was won by someone other than United, City, or Chelsea was 2002. Personally I don't see much difference between United with their £350M debt and City and Chelsea.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,870
    Ratings Received:
    +5,919 / 64 / -11
    In this context there's a vast difference between Utd on the one hand and City and Chelsea on the other.

    The debt that Manu had foisted on them was an acquistion manoeuvre by commercially-driven buyers that was only possible because of the existing value of the club. And if anything, it had a negative effect on their ability to spend money because, unlike City and Chelsea, it was genuine commercial debt that needed servicing. Usually, if you borrow, you get cash in return. All Utd got was new owners who wanted their acquisition costs returned. None of the money involved benefitted the club, only the owners. The direct opposite of Chelsea and Man City in fact.

    City and Chelsea, however, had money thrown at them that they were free to spend on players, and literally as much as they liked, regardless of any financial return.

    It was and still is the grossest distortion of any sort in the league, and no one else comes close, or ever has. Even Blackburn Rovers under Jack Walker, a similar thing admittedly, was small by comparison, and mercifully short-lived. And at least he'd been a supporter so could claim some connection with the club, not that that matters really, but it's better than the random hoisting of a badly-run shambles of a mediocre club to the highest levels.

    Why they should be admired by anyone rather than despised genuinely baffles me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  13. rossdapep

    rossdapep Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,240
    Ratings Received:
    +5,522 / 64 / -31
    The best way to deal with mourinho is to simply ignore him. We all know he says these things to rattle his peers and take pressure off himself and his team. However I do enjoy it when he winds up Wenger, such an easy target too!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. jurgen

    jurgen Busy ****

    Messages:
    3,960
    Ratings Received:
    +6,658 / 96 / -75
    Mental amount of money.. as an average that puts him top doesn't it? £289m = 405.5m euros = 135m euros a season compared to Mourinho's 90.3m euros a season over 10 years. Smaller sample size of course, but that is crazy!
     
  15. hashmander

    hashmander Member

    Messages:
    164
    Ratings Received:
    +30 / 3 / -1
    no it's not. mourinho's net spending is probably close to that 90m while roger's net is anywhere near 135m. if a club spends 150m on incoming transfers but sells 150m worth of talent. you can't use the expenditures to beat the manager over the head with that club is going to get worse or at best stay the same as the previous season. liverpool has a talent identification problem and that's not only on rogers since they have some transfer committee.
     
  16. Led's Zeppelin

    Led's Zeppelin Flaccid Member

    Messages:
    2,870
    Ratings Received:
    +5,919 / 64 / -11
    Once you can afford to out-spend any other club around, as Chelsea have been able to do for a decade now, you can buy certifiably good players rather than be forced to gamble as clubs with less money have to.

    This means that the net spend over time can be reduced because you can sell those expensive players for good fees, replace them with new players on similar fees but higher wages, and keep journos in misleading financial stats for seasons to come.

    Yet another reason why net spend on transfer fees is not a good indicator of anything really.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Danners9

    Danners9 Used in a Squad Rotation system

    Messages:
    11,107
    Ratings Received:
    +14,407 / 96 / -35
    Sky just flashed up a graphic showing Chelsea have spent more than 100m more than Arsenal but, with the sales, Chelsea have a lower net spend.

    If you took away the alarming and slightly suspicious fee for Luiz it would be a different story.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. Mullers

    Mullers Unknown member

    Messages:
    23,913
    Ratings Received:
    +14,239 / 1,119 / -287
    That is what the stadium is for, so we can buy more expensive players.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. yawa

    yawa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,715
    Ratings Received:
    +3,964 / 86 / -34
    I think it's brilliant. Top mind games and you can tell its rubbed people up the wrong way and probably achieved exactly what he wanted. So fair play to him.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Metalhead

    Metalhead Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,997
    Ratings Received:
    +6,690 / 85 / -25
    Spot on and until other managers learn to ignore him, he'll carry on doing it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page